Benchmark Almanac

Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B

Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B ranks first on Multi-SWE-bench mini.

Qwen Released July 31st, 2025 Compare with others
43
Benchmarks with a score
1
Ranked first, out of five or more models
2
In the top three
Qwen Jul 2025

Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B

Open weights

140.0 #178 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • SWE-Bench Pro 38.7% #13 /24
  • Terminal-Bench 2.0 27.2% #35 /43
  • Toolathlon 14.5% #45 /50

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LMArena (Elo) 1,388 #146 of 335 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench 20% #69 of 107 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench V2 20% #94 of 129 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Multi-SWE-bench mini 25.8% #1 of 5 Official leaderboard
Bird-SQL 68.1% #3 of 13 Official leaderboard
SWE-bench Verified 69.6% #16 of 60 Official leaderboard
LiveSQLBench 26.8% #14 of 36 Official leaderboard
Aider Polyglot 61.8% #14 of 30 Lab model card
AutoCodeBench 44.8% #16 of 34 Official leaderboard
SWE-Bench Pro 38.7% #13 of 24 Official leaderboard
ABC-Bench 43.1% #4 of 7 Official leaderboard
SWE-bench-Live 24.7% #7 of 12 Official leaderboard
Spider 2.0 31.1% #14 of 23 Official leaderboard
WeirdML 41.2% #72 of 112 Official leaderboard
ArtifactsBench 47.1% #14 of 20 Official leaderboard
AlgoTune 1.44× #13 of 18 Official leaderboard
GSO-Bench 4.90% #23 of 30 Official leaderboard
Code Arena 1,275 #111 of 128 Official leaderboard
WebDev Arena 1,274 #92 of 105 arena.ai, via Epoch AI
SWE-bench Multilingual 54.7% #66 of 73 Lab model card
Snorkel Agentic Coding 18.8% #10 of 11 Official leaderboard
ALE-Bench 822 #122 of 126 Official leaderboard
OpenHands Index 30.9% #33 of 33 Official leaderboard
AetherCode 7.70% #9 of 9 Official leaderboard
CodeClash 952 #8 of 8 Official leaderboard
Multi-SWE-bench flash 27% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
tau-bench 68.8% #6 of 23 Lab model card
MCPMark 24.8% #12 of 28 Official leaderboard
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 68.7% #22 of 41 Lab model card
Terminal-Bench 27.2% #11 of 18 tbench.ai, via Epoch AI
SnakeBench 21 #116 of 188 Official leaderboard
MCP-Universe 22.9% #19 of 30 Official leaderboard
LisanBench 213.7 #87 of 133 Official leaderboard
Pencil Puzzle Bench 0% #36 of 53 Official leaderboard
Terminal-Bench 2.0 27.2% #35 of 43 Official leaderboard
Toolathlon 14.5% #45 of 50 Official leaderboard
WebArena 49.9% #8 of 8 Lab model card
Mind2Web 55.8% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Physical-Engineering's Last Exam 0.06 #12 of 18 Official leaderboard
StockBench 10.0 #10 of 13 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
BaxBench 37.2% #11 of 34 Official leaderboard
nocot-bench (NCRI) 73.1 #83 of 185 Official leaderboard
AutoBaxBench 16.4% #7 of 11 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 140.0, number 178 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 6 capability results Qwen reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 136.9 to 143.2. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 5 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
Multi-SWE-bench flash 27% Multi-SWE-bench flash 25.3% Leaderboard, unverified, MopenHands +1.7 pts
SWE-bench-Live 26.3% SWE-bench Live 24.7% Leaderboard, OpenHands +1.6 pts
Multi-SWE-bench mini 25.8% Multi-SWE-bench mini 25.8% Leaderboard, self-reported, MopenHands Same
Spider 2.0 31.1% Spider2 31.1% Leaderboard, Spider-Agent Same
SWE-bench Verified 69.6% SWE-bench Verified w/ OpenHands, 500 turns 69.6% Leaderboard, OpenHands Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.