Benchmark Almanac

BABILong

~ Mamba (130M) fine-tune 98.5% tops its leaderboard GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 72.4% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models answer bAbI reasoning questions whose supporting facts are scattered through very long distractor text, at lengths up to millions of tokens.

NeurIPS 2024 Datasets and Benchmarks. 52 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Released
June 2024
Kind
Reasoning over long documents
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last model added
May 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

In recent years, the input context sizes of large language models (LLMs) have increased dramatically. However, existing evaluation methods have not kept pace, failing to comprehensively assess the efficiency of models in handling long contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce the BABILong benchmark, designed to test language models' ability to reason across facts distributed in extremely long documents. BABILong includes a diverse set of 20 reasoning tasks, including fact chaining, simple induction, deduction, counting, and handling lists/sets. These tasks are challenging on their own, and even more demanding when the required facts are scattered across long natural text. Our evaluations show that popular LLMs effectively utilize only 10-20% of the context and their performance declines sharply with increased reasoning complexity. Among alternatives to in-context reasoning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation methods achieve a modest 60% accuracy on single-fact question answering, independent of context length. Among context extension methods, the highest performance is demonstrated by recurrent memory transformers after fine-tuning, enabling the processing of lengths up to 50 million tokens. The BABILong benchmark is extendable to any length to support the evaluation of new upcoming models with increased capabilities, and we provide splits up to 10 million token lengths.

Abstract of BABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystack (arXiv:2406.10149, CC0)
30
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track

~ Mamba (130M) fine-tune tops the leaderboard with 98.5%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024), at 72.4%.

The newest model with a score here came out in May 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 ~ Mamba (130M) fine-tune 98.5%
  2. 2 ~ ARMT (137M) fine-tune 97.9%
  3. 3 ~ RMT (137M) fine-tune 91%
  4. 4 Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 73.1%
  5. 5 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 72.4%
  6. 6 Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 63.6%
  7. 7 Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct 63%
  8. 8 Mixtral-8x22B-Instruct-v0.1 62.1%
  9. 9 Command R (03-2024) 59.1%
  10. 10 Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct 55.2%
  11. 11 01-ai/Yi-34B-200k 54.9%
  12. 12 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 54.1%
  13. 13 Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct 52.1%
  14. 14 ai21labs/Jamba-v0.1 49.7%
  15. 15 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 48.7%
  16. 16 chatglm3-6b-128k 47.6%
  17. 17 activation-beacon-mistral-7b 47.1%
  18. 18 Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B 46.1%
  19. 19 01-ai/Yi-9B-200k 45.6%
  20. 20 v5-Eagle-7B-HF 41.4%
  21. 21 rwkv-6-world-7b 40.2%
  22. 22 Yi-34B 39.6%
  23. 23 Llama-2-7B-32K-Instruct 39%
  24. 24 activation-beacon-llama2-7b-chat 38.9%
  25. 25 Yarn-Mistral-7b-128k 38.6%
  26. 26 LongAlpaca-13B 37.7%
  27. 27 longchat-7b-v1.5-32k 36.4%
  28. 28 LLaMA-2-7B-32K 36.1%
  29. 29 mamba-2.8b-hf 33.2%
  30. 30 GPT-2 (137M) 21%

Source: Official BABILong leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 ~ Mamba (130M) fine-tune 98.5% Official leaderboard
2 ~ ARMT (137M) fine-tune 97.9% Official leaderboard
3 ~ RMT (137M) fine-tune 91% Official leaderboard
4 Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 73.1% Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 72.4% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 63.6% Official leaderboard
7 Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct 63% May 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Mixtral-8x22B-Instruct-v0.1 62.1% Official leaderboard
9 Command R (03-2024) 59.1% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct 55.2% Official leaderboard
11 01-ai/Yi-34B-200k 54.9% Official leaderboard
12 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 54.1% Official leaderboard
13 Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct 52.1% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
14 ai21labs/Jamba-v0.1 49.7% Official leaderboard
15 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 48.7% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
16 chatglm3-6b-128k 47.6% Official leaderboard
17 activation-beacon-mistral-7b 47.1% Official leaderboard
18 Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-8B 46.1% RAG Official leaderboard
19 01-ai/Yi-9B-200k 45.6% Official leaderboard
20 v5-Eagle-7B-HF 41.4% Official leaderboard
21 rwkv-6-world-7b 40.2% Official leaderboard
22 Yi-34B 39.6% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
23 Llama-2-7B-32K-Instruct 39% Official leaderboard
24 activation-beacon-llama2-7b-chat 38.9% Official leaderboard
25 Yarn-Mistral-7b-128k 38.6% Official leaderboard
26 LongAlpaca-13B 37.7% Official leaderboard
27 longchat-7b-v1.5-32k 36.4% Official leaderboard
28 LLaMA-2-7B-32K 36.1% Official leaderboard
29 mamba-2.8b-hf 33.2% Official leaderboard
30 GPT-2 (137M) 21% Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2024

Source: Official BABILong leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 Yi-34B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2

Source: Official BABILong leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Long context

All 79 in Long context
  • MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
  • LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy. Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
  • GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
  • OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin. Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
  • CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
  • AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key. Step 5 Preview 88.3%