LongBench v2
503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy.
- Made by
- Tsinghua KEG / Zhipu
- Released
- December 2024
- Kind
- Reasoning over long documents
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- November 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
This paper introduces LongBench v2, a benchmark designed to assess the ability of LLMs to handle long-context problems requiring deep understanding and reasoning across real-world multitasks. LongBench v2 consists of 503 challenging multiple-choice questions, with contexts ranging from 8k to 2M words, across six major task categories: single-document QA, multi-document QA, long in-context learning, long-dialogue history understanding, code repository understanding, and long structured data understanding. To ensure the breadth and the practicality, we collect data from nearly 100 highly educated individuals with diverse professional backgrounds. We employ both automated and manual review processes to maintain high quality and difficulty, resulting in human experts achieving only 53.7% accuracy under a 15-minute time constraint. Our evaluation reveals that the best-performing model, when directly answers the questions, achieves only 50.1% accuracy. In contrast, the o1-preview model, which includes longer reasoning, achieves 57.7%, surpassing the human baseline by 4%. These results highlight the importance of enhanced reasoning ability and scaling inference-time compute to tackle the long-context challenges in LongBench v2. The project is available at https://longbench2.github.io.
Inkling 2 Small leads with 70.6%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 63.3% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Inkling 2 Small leads with 70.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 70.6
Inkling 2 Small
- 66.9 Beam 1.0
- 66.3
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 65.4
Tencent Hy3 preview
- 64.5 GLM-5
- 63.8
Seed2.0 Pro
- 63.2
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 62.0
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 61.9
Nemotron 3 Ultra
- 61.5
MiniMax-M1-80k
- 61.0 Kimi K2.5
- 61.0
MAI-Thinking-1
- 60.6 MiMo-V2-Flash
- 60.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 60.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 59.6
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 59.0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 57.5
Step 3.5 Flash
- 56.5
MiniMax-Text-01
- 55.2
Qwen3.5-9B
- 55.0
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct
- 53.3
Spark-X2.6-4B
- 51.5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 50.0
Qwen3.5-4B
- 49.1 Kimi K2
- 48.7
DeepSeek-V3
- 48.7
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B
- 48.3
Ling-2.6-1T
- 45.2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 45.2
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base
- 43.4
Cohere Command A
- 40.3
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B
- 38.7
Qwen3.5-2B
- 37.2
Mistral Small 3.1
- 26.1
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
- 2 Beam 1.0 66.9%
- 3
Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3%
- 4
Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4%
- 5 GLM-5 64.5%
- 6
Seed2.0 Pro 63.8%
- 7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2%
- 8
Qwen 3.6 Plus 62%
- 9
Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9%
- 10
MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5%
- 11 Kimi K2.5 61%
- 12
MAI-Thinking-1 61%
- 13 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6%
- 14
Qwen3.5-27B 60.6%
- 15
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2%
- 16
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6%
- 17
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 59%
- 18
Step 3.5 Flash 57.5%
- 19
MiniMax-Text-01 56.5%
- 20
Qwen3.5-9B 55.2%
- 21
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55%
- 22
Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3%
- 23
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5%
- 24
Qwen3.5-4B 50%
- 25 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1%
- 26
DeepSeek-V3 48.7%
- 27
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7%
- 28
Ling-2.6-1T 48.3%
- 29
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2%
- 30
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 45.2%
- 31
Cohere Command A 43.4%
- 32
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3%
- 33
Qwen3.5-2B 38.7%
- 34
Mistral Small 3.1 37.2%
- 35
Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 63.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 62.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 60.6
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 58.3
DeepSeek-R1
- 58.3
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 57.7 o1-preview
- 56.7
DeepSeek-R1
- 56.5
MiniMax-Text-01
- 56.0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
- 51.4 GPT-4o
- 51.2 GPT-4o
- 51.1
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 50.3 GLM-4.5
- 50.1
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 50.1
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking
- 49.2
Qwen3-32B
- 48.9
QwQ-32B
- 48.6 GLM-4.5-Air
- 46.7 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 44.9 Kimi K2
- 43.5
Qwen2.5-72B
- 42.5
Qwen3-30B-A3B
- 39.6
Mistral Large 2
- 38.9 o1-mini
- 36.2
Llama 3.1-70B
- 36.2
Llama 3.3 70B
- 35.6
Qwen2.5-7B
- 35.2
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct
- 33.6
Mistral Large 2
- 32.4 GPT-4o mini
- 31.6
Command R+
- 30.8 GLM-4-9B
- 30.4
Llama 3.1-8B
- 1
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025, CoT 63.3%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025, CoT 62.1%
- 3
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025, CoT 60.6%
- 4
DeepSeek-R1 CoT 58.3%
- 5
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025, CoT 58.3%
- 6 o1-preview CoT 57.7%
- 7
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025, CoT 56.7%
- 8
MiniMax-Text-01 CoT 56.5%
- 9
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025, CoT 56%
- 10 GPT-4o Nov 2024, CoT 51.4%
- 11 GPT-4o Aug 2024, CoT 51.2%
- 12
Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024, CoT 51.1%
- 13 GLM-4.5 CoT 50.3%
- 14
Qwen3-235B-A22B CoT 50.1%
- 15
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025, CoT 50.1%
- 16
Qwen3-32B CoT 49.2%
- 17
QwQ-32B CoT 48.9%
- 18 GLM-4.5-Air CoT 48.6%
- 19 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) CoT 46.7%
- 20 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 44.9%
- 21
Qwen2.5-72B CoT 43.5%
- 22
Qwen3-30B-A3B CoT 42.5%
- 23
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024, CoT 39.6%
- 24 o1-mini CoT 38.9%
- 25
Llama 3.1-70B CoT 36.2%
- 26
Llama 3.3 70B CoT 36.2%
- 27
Qwen2.5-7B CoT 35.6%
- 28
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct CoT 35.2%
- 29
Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024, CoT 33.6%
- 30 GPT-4o mini CoT 32.4%
- 31
Command R+ CoT 31.6%
- 32 GLM-4-9B CoT 30.8%
- 33
Llama 3.1-8B CoT 30.4%
Source: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard
- 70.6
Inkling 2 Small
- 66.9 Beam 1.0
- 66.3
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 65.4
Tencent Hy3 preview
- 64.5 GLM-5
- 63.8
Seed2.0 Pro
- 63.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 63.2
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 62.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 62.0
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 61.9
Nemotron 3 Ultra
- 61.5
MiniMax-M1-80k
- 61.0 Kimi K2.5
- 61.0
MAI-Thinking-1
- 60.6
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 60.6 MiMo-V2-Flash
- 60.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 60.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 59.6
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 59.0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 58.3
DeepSeek-R1
- 58.3
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 57.7 o1-preview
- 57.5
Step 3.5 Flash
- 56.7
DeepSeek-R1
- 56.5
MiniMax-Text-01
- 56.0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
- 55.2
Qwen3.5-9B
- 55.0
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct
- 53.3
Spark-X2.6-4B
- 51.5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 51.4 GPT-4o
- 51.2 GPT-4o
- 51.1
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 50.3 GLM-4.5
- 50.1
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 50.1
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking
- 50.0
Qwen3.5-4B
- 49.2
Qwen3-32B
- 49.1 Kimi K2
- 48.9
QwQ-32B
- 48.7
DeepSeek-V3
- 48.7
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B
- 48.6 GLM-4.5-Air
- 48.3
Ling-2.6-1T
- 46.7 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 45.2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 45.2
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base
- 43.5
Qwen2.5-72B
- 43.4
Cohere Command A
- 42.5
Qwen3-30B-A3B
- 40.3
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B
- 39.6
Mistral Large 2
- 38.9 o1-mini
- 38.7
Qwen3.5-2B
- 37.2
Mistral Small 3.1
- 36.2
Llama 3.1-70B
- 36.2
Llama 3.3 70B
- 35.6
Qwen2.5-7B
- 35.2
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct
- 33.6
Mistral Large 2
- 32.4 GPT-4o mini
- 31.6
Command R+
- 30.8 GLM-4-9B
- 30.4
Llama 3.1-8B
- 26.1
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
- 2 Beam 1.0 66.9%
- 3
Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3%
- 4
Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4%
- 5 GLM-5 64.5%
- 6
Seed2.0 Pro 63.8%
- 7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025, CoT 63.3%
- 8
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2%
- 9
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025, CoT 62.1%
- 10
Qwen 3.6 Plus 62%
- 11
Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9%
- 12
MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5%
- 13 Kimi K2.5 61%
- 14
MAI-Thinking-1 61%
- 15
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025, CoT 60.6%
- 16 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6%
- 17
Qwen3.5-27B 60.6%
- 18
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2%
- 19
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6%
- 20
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 59%
- 21
DeepSeek-R1 CoT 58.3%
- 22
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025, CoT 58.3%
- 23 o1-preview CoT 57.7%
- 24
Step 3.5 Flash 57.5%
- 25
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025, CoT 56.7%
- 26
MiniMax-Text-01 CoT 56.5%
- 27
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025, CoT 56%
- 28
Qwen3.5-9B 55.2%
- 29
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55%
- 30
Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3%
- 31
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5%
- 32 GPT-4o Nov 2024, CoT 51.4%
- 33 GPT-4o Aug 2024, CoT 51.2%
- 34
Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024, CoT 51.1%
- 35 GLM-4.5 CoT 50.3%
- 36
Qwen3-235B-A22B CoT 50.1%
- 37
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025, CoT 50.1%
- 38
Qwen3.5-4B 50%
- 39
Qwen3-32B CoT 49.2%
- 40 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1%
- 41
QwQ-32B CoT 48.9%
- 42
DeepSeek-V3 48.7%
- 43
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7%
- 44 GLM-4.5-Air CoT 48.6%
- 45
Ling-2.6-1T 48.3%
- 46 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) CoT 46.7%
- 47
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2%
- 48
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 45.2%
- 49
Qwen2.5-72B CoT 43.5%
- 50
Cohere Command A 43.4%
- 51
Qwen3-30B-A3B CoT 42.5%
- 52
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3%
- 53
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024, CoT 39.6%
- 54 o1-mini CoT 38.9%
- 55
Qwen3.5-2B 38.7%
- 56
Mistral Small 3.1 37.2%
- 57
Llama 3.1-70B CoT 36.2%
- 58
Llama 3.3 70B CoT 36.2%
- 59
Qwen2.5-7B CoT 35.6%
- 60
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct CoT 35.2%
- 61
Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024, CoT 33.6%
- 62 GPT-4o mini CoT 32.4%
- 63
Command R+ CoT 31.6%
- 64 GLM-4-9B CoT 30.8%
- 65
Llama 3.1-8B CoT 30.4%
- 66
Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official LongBench v2 leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 70.6% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Beam 1.0 | 66.9% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 66.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 65.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GLM-5 | 64.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 63.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 63.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 62% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 61.9% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 61.5% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | Kimi K2.5 | 61% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 61% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | MiMo-V2-Flash | 60.6% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 60.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 60.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 59.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 59% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 57.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 56.5% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 55.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 55% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 53.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 51.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 50% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 49.1% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 48.7% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 48.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 48.3% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 45.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | | 45.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 43.4% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | | 40.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 38.7% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | | 37.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 26.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 63.3% | CoT | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 62.1% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 60.6% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 58.3% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 58.3% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | o1-preview | 57.7% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 56.7% | CoT | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 56.5% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 56% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 51.4% | CoT | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 51.2% | CoT | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 51.1% | CoT | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | GLM-4.5 | 50.3% | CoT | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 50.1% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 50.1% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 49.2% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 48.9% | CoT | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | GLM-4.5-Air | 48.6% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 46.7% | CoT | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 44.9% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 43.5% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 42.5% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 39.6% | CoT | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | o1-mini | 38.9% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 36.2% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 36.2% | CoT | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 35.6% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | | 35.2% | CoT | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | | 33.6% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | GPT-4o mini | 32.4% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 31.6% | CoT | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | GLM-4-9B | 30.8% | CoT | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | | 30.4% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 70.6% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Beam 1.0 | 66.9% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 66.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 65.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GLM-5 | 64.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 63.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 63.3% | CoT | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 63.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 62.1% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 62% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 61.9% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 61.5% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | Kimi K2.5 | 61% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 61% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 60.6% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | MiMo-V2-Flash | 60.6% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 60.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 60.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 59.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 59% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 58.3% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 58.3% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | o1-preview | 57.7% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 57.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 56.7% | CoT | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 56.5% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 56% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | | 55.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 55% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | | 53.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 51.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 51.4% | CoT | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 51.2% | CoT | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | | 51.1% | CoT | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | GLM-4.5 | 50.3% | CoT | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 36 | | 50.1% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | | 50.1% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 38 | | 50% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | | 49.2% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 49.1% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 41 | | 48.9% | CoT | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | | 48.7% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 43 | | 48.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 44 | GLM-4.5-Air | 48.6% | CoT | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 45 | | 48.3% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 46 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 46.7% | CoT | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 47 | | 45.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 48 | | 45.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 49 | | 43.5% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 50 | | 43.4% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 51 | | 42.5% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 52 | | 40.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 53 | | 39.6% | CoT | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 54 | o1-mini | 38.9% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 55 | | 38.7% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 56 | | 37.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 57 | | 36.2% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 58 | | 36.2% | CoT | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 59 | | 35.6% | CoT | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 60 | | 35.2% | CoT | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 61 | | 33.6% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 62 | GPT-4o mini | 32.4% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 63 | | 31.6% | CoT | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 64 | GLM-4-9B | 30.8% | CoT | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 65 | | 30.4% | CoT | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 66 | | 26.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 37 entries, 33 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard
9 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2024 3 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in December 2024 9 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard and labs’ model cards
6 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | 70.6 | LongBench v2 | |
| Oct 23, 2026 | 48.7 | LongBench v2 (48K) | |
| Oct 22, 2026 | 53.3 | LongBench v2 | |
| Oct 5, 2026 | Beam 1.0 | 66.9 | LongBench v2 |
| Sep 10, 2026 | 45.2 | LongBench-V2 (EM) | |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 66.3 | LongBench v2 | |
| Jun 4, 2026 | 61.9 | Longbench v2 (≤ 1M) | |
| Apr 24, 2026 | 51.5 | LongBench-V2 (EM) | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | 65.4 | LongBench v2 | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 62 | LongBench v2 | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 59.6 | LongBench v2 | |
| Mar 19, 2026 | 40.3 | LongBench v2 | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 26.1 | LongBench v2 | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 38.7 | LongBench v2 | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 50 | LongBench v2 | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 55.2 | LongBench v2 | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 59 | LongBench v2 | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 60.6 | LongBench v2 | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 60.2 | LongBench v2 | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 63.2 | LongBench v2 | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | 63.8 | LongBench v2 (128k) | |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 61 | Longbench v2 |
| Dec 16, 2025 | MiMo-V2-Flash | 60.6 | LongBench V2 |
| Jun 16, 2025 | 61.5 | LongBench-v2 | |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 37.2 | LongBench v2 | |
| Jan 15, 2025 | 56.5 | LongBench v2 (overall, w/ CoT) | |
| Dec 26, 2024 | 48.7 | LongBench v2 (Acc.) |
18 system cards report it, from 13 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | | 48.7 | LongBench v2 (48K), released Q4_K_M imatrix checkpoint (Table 5). BF16 50.5 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Sep 10, 2026 | | 45.2 | LongBench-V2, EM, 1-shot | Capabilities |
| Jun 13, 2026 | | 48.3 | LongBenchV2, accuracy (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jun 9, 2026 | | 61.9 | Longbench v2 (<= 1M) (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Jun 2, 2026 | | 61 | LongBenchV2, input limited to 256k tokens, 408 questions (Table 19) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 59.6 | LongBench v2 (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Mar 19, 2026 | | 40.3 | LongBench v2 (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GLM-5 technical report | 64.5 | LongBench v2 (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 63.8 | LongBench v2 (128k) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Feb 11, 2026 | | 57.5 | LongBench v2 (Table 5). PaCoRe 62.0 | Capabilities |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 61 | LongBench v2, inputs truncated to about 128k (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jan 6, 2026 | MiMo-V2-Flash technical report | 60.6 | LongBench V2 (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Jul 21, 2025 | Kimi K2 technical report | 49.1 | LongBench v2 (Acc.), 128K window (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jun 26, 2025 | | 55 | LongBench-v2 (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jun 16, 2025 | | 61.5 | LongBench-v2 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Apr 1, 2025 | | 43.4 | LongBench-V2 Overall (Table 22) | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2025 | | 56.5 | LongBench v2 overall, w/ CoT (Table 10). w/o CoT 52.9 | Capabilities |
| Dec 26, 2024 | | 48.7 | LongBench v2 (Acc.), DeepSeek-V3 (Table 6) | Capabilities |
2 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 49.1% LongBench v2 (Acc.), 128K window (Table 3) | 44.9% Leaderboard | +4.2 pts |
| | 56.5% LongBench v2 (overall, w/ CoT) | 56.5% Leaderboard, CoT | Same |
Versions
More in Long context
- MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
- GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
- OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin.
Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
- CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
- AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key.
Step 5 Preview 88.3%
- LOCA-Bench In use Agentic tasks whose environment state is scaled to grow context length while task semantics stay fixed. Success rate versus context length. GPT-5.2 21.3%