Benchmark Almanac

LongBench v2

Inkling 2 Small 70.6% leads since November 2026
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 63.3% leads since March 2025
Inkling 2 Small 70.6% leads since November 2026
In use

503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy.

Made by
Tsinghua KEG / Zhipu
Released
December 2024
Kind
Reasoning over long documents
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
November 2026
Last model added
November 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

This paper introduces LongBench v2, a benchmark designed to assess the ability of LLMs to handle long-context problems requiring deep understanding and reasoning across real-world multitasks. LongBench v2 consists of 503 challenging multiple-choice questions, with contexts ranging from 8k to 2M words, across six major task categories: single-document QA, multi-document QA, long in-context learning, long-dialogue history understanding, code repository understanding, and long structured data understanding. To ensure the breadth and the practicality, we collect data from nearly 100 highly educated individuals with diverse professional backgrounds. We employ both automated and manual review processes to maintain high quality and difficulty, resulting in human experts achieving only 53.7% accuracy under a 15-minute time constraint. Our evaluation reveals that the best-performing model, when directly answers the questions, achieves only 50.1% accuracy. In contrast, the o1-preview model, which includes longer reasoning, achieves 57.7%, surpassing the human baseline by 4%. These results highlight the importance of enhanced reasoning ability and scaling inference-time compute to tackle the long-context challenges in LongBench v2. The project is available at https://longbench2.github.io.

Abstract of LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitasks (arXiv:2412.15204, CC0)
35
Models scored in lab cards
27
Launch posts list it, from 12 labs
18
System cards report it, from 13 labs

Inkling 2 Small leads with 70.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 63.3% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Inkling 2 Small leads with 70.6%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
  2. 2 Beam 1.0 66.9%
  3. 3 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3%
  4. 4 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4%
  5. 5 GLM-5 64.5%
  6. 6 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2%
  8. 8 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62%
  9. 9 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9%
  10. 10 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5%
  11. 11 Kimi K2.5 61%
  12. 12 MAI-Thinking-1 61%
  13. 13 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6%
  14. 14 Qwen3.5-27B 60.6%
  15. 15 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2%
  16. 16 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 59%
  18. 18 Step 3.5 Flash 57.5%
  19. 19 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5%
  20. 20 Qwen3.5-9B 55.2%
  21. 21 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55%
  22. 22 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3%
  23. 23 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5%
  24. 24 Qwen3.5-4B 50%
  25. 25 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1%
  26. 26 DeepSeek-V3 48.7%
  27. 27 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7%
  28. 28 Ling-2.6-1T 48.3%
  29. 29 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2%
  30. 30 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 45.2%
  31. 31 Cohere Command A 43.4%
  32. 32 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3%
  33. 33 Qwen3.5-2B 38.7%
  34. 34 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2%
  35. 35 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard

  1. 1 Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
  2. 2 Beam 1.0 66.9%
  3. 3 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3%
  4. 4 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4%
  5. 5 GLM-5 64.5%
  6. 6 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8%
  7. 7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025, CoT 63.3%
  8. 8 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2%
  9. 9 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025, CoT 62.1%
  10. 10 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62%
  11. 11 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9%
  12. 12 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5%
  13. 13 Kimi K2.5 61%
  14. 14 MAI-Thinking-1 61%
  15. 15 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025, CoT 60.6%
  16. 16 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5-27B 60.6%
  18. 18 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2%
  19. 19 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6%
  20. 20 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 59%
  21. 21 DeepSeek-R1 CoT 58.3%
  22. 22 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025, CoT 58.3%
  23. 23 o1-preview CoT 57.7%
  24. 24 Step 3.5 Flash 57.5%
  25. 25 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025, CoT 56.7%
  26. 26 MiniMax-Text-01 CoT 56.5%
  27. 27 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025, CoT 56%
  28. 28 Qwen3.5-9B 55.2%
  29. 29 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55%
  30. 30 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3%
  31. 31 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5%
  32. 32 GPT-4o Nov 2024, CoT 51.4%
  33. 33 GPT-4o Aug 2024, CoT 51.2%
  34. 34 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024, CoT 51.1%
  35. 35 GLM-4.5 CoT 50.3%
  36. 36 Qwen3-235B-A22B CoT 50.1%
  37. 37 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025, CoT 50.1%
  38. 38 Qwen3.5-4B 50%
  39. 39 Qwen3-32B CoT 49.2%
  40. 40 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1%
  41. 41 QwQ-32B CoT 48.9%
  42. 42 DeepSeek-V3 48.7%
  43. 43 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7%
  44. 44 GLM-4.5-Air CoT 48.6%
  45. 45 Ling-2.6-1T 48.3%
  46. 46 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) CoT 46.7%
  47. 47 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2%
  48. 48 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 45.2%
  49. 49 Qwen2.5-72B CoT 43.5%
  50. 50 Cohere Command A 43.4%
  51. 51 Qwen3-30B-A3B CoT 42.5%
  52. 52 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3%
  53. 53 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024, CoT 39.6%
  54. 54 o1-mini CoT 38.9%
  55. 55 Qwen3.5-2B 38.7%
  56. 56 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2%
  57. 57 Llama 3.1-70B CoT 36.2%
  58. 58 Llama 3.3 70B CoT 36.2%
  59. 59 Qwen2.5-7B CoT 35.6%
  60. 60 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct CoT 35.2%
  61. 61 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024, CoT 33.6%
  62. 62 GPT-4o mini CoT 32.4%
  63. 63 Command R+ CoT 31.6%
  64. 64 GLM-4-9B CoT 30.8%
  65. 65 Llama 3.1-8B CoT 30.4%
  66. 66 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1%

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official LongBench v2 leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Inkling 2 Small 70.6% Nov 2026 Lab model card
2 Beam 1.0 66.9% Oct 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3% Aug 2026 Lab model card
4 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
5 GLM-5 64.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62% Apr 2026 Lab model card
9 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9% Jun 2026 Lab model card
10 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5% Jun 2025 Lab model card
11 Kimi K2.5 61% Jan 2026 Lab model card
12 MAI-Thinking-1 61% Jun 2026 Lab model card
13 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
14 Qwen3.5-27B 60.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
15 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
16 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
17 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 59% Feb 2026 Lab model card
18 Step 3.5 Flash 57.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
19 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5% Jan 2025 Lab model card
20 Qwen3.5-9B 55.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
21 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55% Jun 2025 Lab model card
22 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3% Oct 2026 Lab model card
23 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
24 Qwen3.5-4B 50% Mar 2026 Lab model card
25 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1% Jul 2025 Lab model card
26 DeepSeek-V3 48.7% Dec 2024 Lab model card
27 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7% Oct 2026 Lab model card
28 Ling-2.6-1T 48.3% Jun 2026 Lab model card
29 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2% Sep 2026 Lab model card
30 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 45.2% Sep 2026 Lab model card
31 Cohere Command A 43.4% Apr 2025 Lab model card
32 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
33 Qwen3.5-2B 38.7% Mar 2026 Lab model card
34 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2% Mar 2025 Lab model card
35 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 63.3% CoT Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 62.1% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 60.6% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-R1 58.3% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 58.3% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 o1-preview 57.7% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 56.7% CoT May 2025 Official leaderboard
8 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 56% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-4o Nov 2024 51.4% CoT Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4o Aug 2024 51.2% CoT Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 51.1% CoT Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
13 GLM-4.5 50.3% CoT Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen3-235B-A22B 50.1% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025 50.1% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen3-32B 49.2% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 QwQ-32B 48.9% CoT Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
18 GLM-4.5-Air 48.6% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 46.7% CoT Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 44.9% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen2.5-72B 43.5% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3-30B-A3B 42.5% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 39.6% CoT Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
24 o1-mini 38.9% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
25 Llama 3.1-70B 36.2% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Llama 3.3 70B 36.2% CoT Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
27 Qwen2.5-7B 35.6% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
28 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct 35.2% CoT Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
29 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 33.6% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
30 GPT-4o mini 32.4% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
31 Command R+ 31.6% CoT Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
32 GLM-4-9B 30.8% CoT Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
33 Llama 3.1-8B 30.4% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Inkling 2 Small 70.6% Nov 2026 Lab model card
2 Beam 1.0 66.9% Oct 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3% Aug 2026 Lab model card
4 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
5 GLM-5 64.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 63.3% CoT Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
9 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 62.1% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62% Apr 2026 Lab model card
11 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9% Jun 2026 Lab model card
12 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5% Jun 2025 Lab model card
13 Kimi K2.5 61% Jan 2026 Lab model card
14 MAI-Thinking-1 61% Jun 2026 Lab model card
15 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 60.6% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
16 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
17 Qwen3.5-27B 60.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
19 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
20 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 59% Feb 2026 Lab model card
21 DeepSeek-R1 58.3% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 58.3% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
23 o1-preview 57.7% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Step 3.5 Flash 57.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
25 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 56.7% CoT May 2025 Official leaderboard
26 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 56% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Qwen3.5-9B 55.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
29 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55% Jun 2025 Lab model card
30 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3% Oct 2026 Lab model card
31 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
32 GPT-4o Nov 2024 51.4% CoT Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
33 GPT-4o Aug 2024 51.2% CoT Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
34 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 51.1% CoT Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
35 GLM-4.5 50.3% CoT Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
36 Qwen3-235B-A22B 50.1% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025 50.1% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
38 Qwen3.5-4B 50% Mar 2026 Lab model card
39 Qwen3-32B 49.2% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
40 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1% Jul 2025 Lab model card
41 QwQ-32B 48.9% CoT Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
42 DeepSeek-V3 48.7% Dec 2024 Lab model card
43 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7% Oct 2026 Lab model card
44 GLM-4.5-Air 48.6% CoT Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
45 Ling-2.6-1T 48.3% Jun 2026 Lab model card
46 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 46.7% CoT Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
47 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2% Sep 2026 Lab model card
48 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 45.2% Sep 2026 Lab model card
49 Qwen2.5-72B 43.5% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
50 Cohere Command A 43.4% Apr 2025 Lab model card
51 Qwen3-30B-A3B 42.5% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
52 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
53 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 39.6% CoT Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
54 o1-mini 38.9% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
55 Qwen3.5-2B 38.7% Mar 2026 Lab model card
56 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2% Mar 2025 Lab model card
57 Llama 3.1-70B 36.2% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
58 Llama 3.3 70B 36.2% CoT Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
59 Qwen2.5-7B 35.6% CoT Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
60 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct 35.2% CoT Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
61 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 33.6% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
62 GPT-4o mini 32.4% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
63 Command R+ 31.6% CoT Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
64 GLM-4-9B 30.8% CoT Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
65 Llama 3.1-8B 30.4% CoT Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
66 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 37 entries, 33 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
CoT
58.3%
MiniMax-Text-01
CoT
56.5%
GPT-4o
CoT
51.4%
GPT-4o
CoT
51.2%
Gemini 2.0 Flash
CoT
51.1%
Qwen3-235B-A22B
CoT
50.1%
Qwen3-32B
CoT
49.2%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
CoT
46.7%
Kimi K2
CoT
44.9%
Qwen2.5-72B
CoT
43.5%
Qwen3-30B-A3B
CoT
42.5%
Mistral Large 2
CoT
39.6%

Source: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard

9 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2024 3 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in December 2024 9 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI DeepSeek Google DeepMind MiniMax ByteDance Seed Z.ai Tencent Qwen Reflection Thinking Machines
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2025
Lab claims 9 leaders

Sources: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Inkling 2 Small Qwen 3.8 Max GLM-5 Gemini 2.5 Pro DeepSeek-R1 GPT-4o Llama 3.1-70B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Inkling 2 Small Seed2.0 Pro

Sources: Official LongBench v2 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

6 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
MiniMax
Mistral AI
Xiaomi Corp
Moonshot AI
ByteDance Seed
Qwen
NVIDIA
Tencent
Reflection
iFlytek
Thinking Machines
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Nov 5, 2026 Inkling 2 Small 70.6 LongBench v2
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7 LongBench v2 (48K)
Oct 22, 2026 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3 LongBench v2
Oct 5, 2026 Beam 1.0 66.9 LongBench v2
Sep 10, 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2 LongBench-V2 (EM)
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3 LongBench v2
Jun 4, 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9 Longbench v2 (≤ 1M)
Apr 24, 2026 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5 LongBench-V2 (EM)
Apr 23, 2026 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4 LongBench v2
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62 LongBench v2
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6 LongBench v2
Mar 19, 2026 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3 LongBench v2
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1 LongBench v2
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 38.7 LongBench v2
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 50 LongBench v2
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 55.2 LongBench v2
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 59 LongBench v2
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 60.6 LongBench v2
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2 LongBench v2
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2 LongBench v2
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8 LongBench v2 (128k)
Jan 27, 2026 Kimi K2.5 61 Longbench v2
Dec 16, 2025 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6 LongBench V2
Jun 16, 2025 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5 LongBench-v2
Mar 17, 2025 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2 LongBench v2
Jan 15, 2025 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5 LongBench v2 (overall, w/ CoT)
Dec 26, 2024 DeepSeek-V3 48.7 LongBench v2 (Acc.)

18 system cards report it, from 13 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 48.7 LongBench v2 (48K), released Q4_K_M imatrix checkpoint (Table 5). BF16 50.5 (Table 3) Capabilities
Sep 10, 2026 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base model card 45.2 LongBench-V2, EM, 1-shot Capabilities
Jun 13, 2026 Ling-2.6-1T technical report 48.3 LongBenchV2, accuracy (Table 5) Capabilities
Jun 9, 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra technical report 61.9 Longbench v2 (<= 1M) (Table 10) Capabilities
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 technical report 61 LongBenchV2, input limited to 256k tokens, 408 questions (Table 19) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 59.6 LongBench v2 (Table 4) Capabilities
Mar 19, 2026 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B technical report 40.3 LongBench v2 (Table 1) Capabilities
Feb 17, 2026 GLM-5 technical report 64.5 LongBench v2 (Table 7) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 63.8 LongBench v2 (128k) (Table 3) Capabilities
Feb 11, 2026 Step 3.5 Flash technical report 57.5 LongBench v2 (Table 5). PaCoRe 62.0 Capabilities
Jan 30, 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 61 LongBench v2, inputs truncated to about 128k (Table 4) Capabilities
Jan 6, 2026 MiMo-V2-Flash technical report 60.6 LongBench V2 (Table 9) Capabilities
Jul 21, 2025 Kimi K2 technical report 49.1 LongBench v2 (Acc.), 128K window (Table 3) Capabilities
Jun 26, 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct technical report 55 LongBench-v2 (Table 5) Capabilities
Jun 16, 2025 MiniMax-M1-80k technical report 61.5 LongBench-v2 (Table 2) Capabilities
Apr 1, 2025 Cohere Command A technical report 43.4 LongBench-V2 Overall (Table 22) Capabilities
Jan 14, 2025 MiniMax-Text-01 technical report 56.5 LongBench v2 overall, w/ CoT (Table 10). w/o CoT 52.9 Capabilities
Dec 26, 2024 DeepSeek-V3 technical report 48.7 LongBench v2 (Acc.), DeepSeek-V3 (Table 6) Capabilities

2 lab claims next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1% LongBench v2 (Acc.), 128K window (Table 3) 44.9% Leaderboard +4.2 pts
MiniMax-Text-01 56.5% LongBench v2 (overall, w/ CoT) 56.5% Leaderboard, CoT Same

Versions

More in Long context

All 79 in Long context
  • MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
  • GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
  • OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin. Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
  • CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
  • AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key. Step 5 Preview 88.3%
  • LOCA-Bench In use Agentic tasks whose environment state is scaled to grow context length while task semantics stay fixed. Success rate versus context length. GPT-5.2 21.3%