BenchCAD
Programmatic CAD: 17,900 execution-verified CadQuery programs over 106 industrial part families. Four matched tasks scored on geometry.
Models reconstruct CAD geometry. Later BenchCAD versions add engineering tasks and different scoring, so their scores do not compare.
- Made by
- BenchCAD team
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- CAD models
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
In the authors’ words
Industrial Computer-Aided Design (CAD) code generation requires models to produce executable parametric programs from visual or textual inputs. Beyond recognizing the outer shape of a part, this task involves understanding its 3D structure, inferring engineering parameters, and choosing CAD operations that reflect how the part would be designed and manufactured. Despite the promise of Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for this task, they are rarely evaluated on whether these capabilities jointly hold in realistic industrial CAD settings. We present BenchCAD, a unified benchmark for industrial CAD reasoning. BenchCAD contains 17,900 execution-verified CadQuery programs across 106 industrial part families, including bevel gears, compression springs, twist drills, and other reusable engineering designs. It evaluates models through visual question answering, code question answering, image-to-code generation, and instruction-guided code editing, enabling fine-grained analysis across perception, parametric abstraction, and executable program synthesis. Across 10+ frontier models, BenchCAD shows that current systems often recover coarse outer geometry but fail to produce faithful parametric CAD programs. Common failures include missing fine 3D structure, misinterpreting industrial design parameters, and replacing essential operations such as sweeps, lofts, and twist-extrudes with simpler sketch-and-extrude patterns. Fine-tuning and reinforcement learning improve in-distribution performance, but generalization to unseen part families remains limited. These results position BenchCAD as a benchmark for measuring and improving the industrial readiness of multimodal CAD automation.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 95.9%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 GPT-6 Astra 95.9%
- 2 Kimi K3.1 Pro 92.7%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Terra 78.2%
- 4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 74.7%
- 5 GPT-5.6 Luna 73.9%
- 6 Claude Opus 5.5 73%
- 7 GPT-5.6 Sol 70.6%
- 8 Claude Haiku 5.5 67%
- 9 Claude Fable 5.1 43.7%
- 10 Claude Opus 5 36.6%
- 11 Claude Sonnet 5 26.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 95.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 92.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 78.2% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 74.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 73.9% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 73% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 70.6% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 67% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 43.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5 | 36.6% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 26.6% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card |
3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in May 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
OpenAI’s own number for GPT-6 Astra passed 85% in September 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 92.7 | BenchCAD w/ tools (w/o tools 72.8) |
| Sep 3, 2026 | GPT-6 Astra | 95.9 | BenchCAD |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 73.9 | BenchCAD (python tool) 73.9 (no tools 63.1) |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 78.2 | BenchCAD (python tool) 78.2 (no tools 62.3) |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 70.6 | BenchCAD |
6 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 67 | BenchCAD Vision2Code, 1,000-file subset, voxel IoU 0.670 without tools (0.870 with tools), max effort (8.9.2) | Capabilities |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 74.7 | BenchCAD Vision2Code, 1,000-file subset, voxel IoU 0.747 without tools (0.963 with tools) (8.13.2, Figure 8.13.2.A) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 73 | BenchCAD Vision2Code, 1,000-file subset, voxel IoU 0.730 without tools (0.962 with tools), max effort, 256 px views (8.13.2, Figure 8.13.2.A) | Capabilities |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 43.7 | BenchCAD Vision2Code, 1,000-file subset, voxel IoU 0.437 without tools; 0.843 with tools (8.14.2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 36.6 | BenchCAD Vision2Code, 1,000-file subset, voxel IoU 0.366 without tools (0.821 with tools), max effort, five runs (8.12.2) | Capabilities |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 26.6 | BenchCAD Vision2Code, 1,000-file subset, voxel IoU 0.266 without tools (0.373 with tools), max effort (8.10.3) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Sources: Official leaderboards and labs’ model cards
More in Engineering and CAD
- EEBench In use 13 electrical-engineering circuit and PCB design tasks graded by deterministic build checks, simulation and BOM constraints. No LLM judge.
Gemini 4 Carbon 83.9%
- Parametric CAD Bench In use Agents author editable parametric FreeCAD part designs, graded against held-back references for geometry and spec consistency. Claude Opus 5.5 61%
- 3DCodeBench In use Agentic procedural 3D modeling via code: author engine-ready 3D assets through software APIs. Graded for executability and shape fidelity.
LongCat-2.5 55.4%
- CADGenBench Only in system cards Agents construct CAD models from design prompts. The generation split is graded for executability and geometric correctness. Claude Fable 5 45.1%
- PartBench Only in system cards Parametric mechanical part design and CAD-style generation, graded for geometric and manufacturing fidelity. Grok 4.6 58.5%
- LMBuild Not in model cards Language model agents design 3D structures as parts, joints, materials and assembly steps. Scoring checks that the structures can be built and work as intended. GPT-6 Astra 66.5%