Benchmark Almanac

BLEnD

Apertus 70B 66.3% leads since September 2025
Dropped

Models answer 52.6k questions about everyday culture in 16 countries and regions across 13 languages. Scoring is accuracy on short-answer and multiple-choice formats.

The multiple choice file was updated to v1.1 on May 2nd, 2025. On September 14th, 2026 the maker added SemEval-2026 Task 7 data for 17 more language-culture pairs in a separate folder. Results that include it are a different set.

Made by
KAIST
Released
June 2024
Kind
Knowledge in many languages
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen2.5-72B #165 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2024, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2025

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) often lack culture-specific knowledge of daily life, especially across diverse regions and non-English languages. Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs' cultural sensitivities are limited to a single language or collected from online sources such as Wikipedia, which do not reflect the mundane everyday lifestyles of diverse regions. That is, information about the food people eat for their birthday celebrations, spices they typically use, musical instruments youngsters play, or the sports they practice in school is common cultural knowledge but uncommon in easily collected online sources, especially for underrepresented cultures. To address this issue, we introduce BLEnD, a hand-crafted benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' everyday knowledge across diverse cultures and languages. BLEnD comprises 52.6k question-answer pairs from 16 countries/regions, in 13 different languages, including low-resource ones such as Amharic, Assamese, Azerbaijani, Hausa, and Sundanese. We construct the benchmark to include two formats of questions: short-answer and multiple-choice. We show that LLMs perform better for cultures that are highly represented online, with a maximum 57.34% difference in GPT-4, the best-performing model, in the short-answer format. For cultures represented by mid-to-high-resource languages, LLMs perform better in their local languages, but for cultures represented by low-resource languages, LLMs perform better in English than the local languages. We make our dataset publicly available at: https://github.com/nlee0212/BLEnD.

Abstract of BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages (arXiv:2406.09948, CC0)
5
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
5
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Apertus 70B leads with 66.3% among models released by September 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Apertus 70B 66.3%
  2. 2 Qwen2.5-72B 32.5%
  3. 3 Qwen2.5-32B 27.9%
  4. 4 Qwen2.5-14B 27%
  5. 5 Qwen2.5-7B 23.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Apertus 70B 66.3% Sep 2025 Lab model card
2 Qwen2.5-72B 32.5% Sep 2024 Lab model card
3 Qwen2.5-32B 27.9% Dec 2024 Lab model card
4 Qwen2.5-14B 27% Dec 2024 Lab model card
5 Qwen2.5-7B 23.7% Dec 2024 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen Swiss AI Initiative
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2025
Apertus 70B 66.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Apertus 70B Qwen2.5-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Apertus 70B Qwen2.5-72B

Source: Labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since September 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-72B 32.5 BLEnD

5 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 17, 2025 Apertus 70B technical report 66.3 BLEnD (Table 20) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-7B technical report 23.7 BLEnD, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Table 14) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-72B technical report 32.5 BLEnD, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (Table 13) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-32B technical report 27.9 BLEnD, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Table 13) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-14B technical report 27 BLEnD, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 14) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 120 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%