Benchmark Almanac

Qwen2.5-14B

Qwen2.5-14B places in the top three on WebWalkerQA.

Qwen Released September 19th, 2024 Compare with others
52
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
1
In the top three
Qwen Sep 2024

Qwen2.5-14B

Open weights

124.6 #316 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • KOR-Bench 49.4% #12 /33
  • MolecularIQ 6.63% #11 /17
  • When2Call 36.2% #4 /10

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
ArabicMMLU 68.5% #4 of 39 Official leaderboard
MadinahQA 59.9% #5 of 39 Official leaderboard
MMLU 79.9% #11 of 85 Claim in Phi-4 Technical Report, via Epoch AI
AlGhafa 77.2% #6 of 39 Official leaderboard
ArbMMLU-HT 61.7% #6 of 39 Official leaderboard
Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard v2 68.5% #6 of 39 Official leaderboard
MuSR 45% #16 of 98 Official leaderboard
Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard v1 53.4% #9 of 55 Official leaderboard
MMLU-CF 67% #9 of 37 Official leaderboard
ALRAGE 78.9% #10 of 39 Official leaderboard
MLogiQA 53.5% #5 of 17 Official leaderboard
EQ-Bench v2 79.2 #26 of 85 Official leaderboard
RULER 91.4% #18 of 42 Lab model card
MT-Bench 8.88 #10 of 23 Lab model card
Ko-IFEval (Upstage) 37.6% #10 of 21 Official leaderboard
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) 4.20% #71 of 148 Official leaderboard
MGSM 82.3% #31 of 57 Lab model card
Chinese SimpleQA 37.2% #15 of 27 Official leaderboard
Okapi MMLU 72.1% #5 of 8 Lab model card
SuperGPQA 35.1% #41 of 59 Official leaderboard
Arena-Hard-Auto 68.3% #28 of 39 Lab model card
AMMLU 66.8% #3 of 4 Lab model card
IndoMMLU 65.1% #3 of 4 Lab model card
JMMLU 72.8% #3 of 4 Lab model card
Multilingual IFEval 77.1% #3 of 4 Lab model card
TurkishMMLU 66.8% #3 of 4 Lab model card
IFEval 81% #102 of 135 Lab model card
FaithJudge 29% #28 of 37 Official leaderboard
BLEnD 27% #4 of 5 Lab model card
KMMLU 59.7% #5 of 6 Lab model card
LongBench-Chat 8.04 #5 of 6 Lab model card
MMLU-Pro 63.7% #141 of 167 Lab model card
MMLU-Redux 80% #40 of 45 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GSM8K 94.8% #14 of 92 Lab model card
MATH 80% #27 of 99 Lab model card
KOR-Bench 49.4% #12 of 33 Official leaderboard
PHYSICS 19.6% #8 of 20 Official leaderboard
GPQA Diamond 45.5% #258 of 302 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MBPP 82% #16 of 71 Lab model card
BigCodeBench 46% #32 of 69 Official leaderboard
HumanEval 83.5% #47 of 101 Lab model card
BigCodeBench-Hard 20.9% #54 of 96 Official leaderboard
LiveCodeBench 42.6% #33 of 54 Lab model card
MultiPL-E 72.8% #12 of 18 Lab model card

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
When2Call 36.2% #4 of 10 Official leaderboard
WebWalkerQA 27.5% #2 of 5 Official leaderboard
C3-Bench 7.81% #15 of 30 Official leaderboard
AgentBench FC 27.2% #12 of 12 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AraTrust 86.5% #8 of 39 Official leaderboard
MolecularIQ 6.63% #11 of 17 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Open LLM Leaderboard v2 31.9 #21 of 99 Official leaderboard
LiveBench 44.4% #24 of 27 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 124.6, number 316 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 14 capability results Qwen reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 122.8 to 126.5. How we compute it.

Its lab's number next to a leaderboard

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
MMLU-Pro 63.7% MMLU-Pro, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 7) 63.7% Leaderboard Same

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 27 of them aren't in the launch post.