CAIS Vision Capabilities Index
Averages model scores on five vision tests run by the Center for AI Safety: ERQA, MindCube, SpatialViz-Bench, IntPhys 2 and EnigmaEval.
One of three CAIS dashboard indexes, next to the Text Capabilities Index and the Risk Index. CAIS announced the dashboard in AI Safety Newsletter 66 on December 2nd, 2025. 52 models had scores on October 23rd, 2026.
- Made by
- Center for AI Safety
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Composite indices
- Level
- Research frontier
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
Gemini 4 Argon leads with 83.3
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
- 83.3
Gemini 4 Argon
- 83.0 GPT-6 Astra
- 77.9 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 76.8 Claude Opus 5.5
- 71.2
Muse Wonder
- 69.9
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 68.9 Claude Fable 5.1
- 68.7
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 68.0 Claude Opus 5
- 66.6 Claude Fable 5
- 66.4 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 64.6
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 64.3 GPT-5.5
- 62.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 60.6 Kimi K3
- 60.1
Muse Spark 1.1
- 59.4
Muse Spark Open
- 59.3
Gemini 3 Flash
- 57.7 GPT-5.4
- 57.1
Gemini 3 Pro
- 56.2 Grok 4.5
- 55.3 Kimi K2.6
- 55.1 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 53.7 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 53.0 Claude Opus 4.8
- 52.2 GPT-5.2
- 51.2 Claude Opus 4.7
- 48.5 Grok 4.20
- 48.4 Grok 4.3
- 47.8 GPT-5
- 47.7 Claude Opus 4.6
- 47.5 GPT-5 mini
- 47.4 GPT-5.1
- 46.6 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 46.5 o3
- 46.3 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 45.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 45.4 Claude Opus 4.5
- 44.7
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 42.5 Grok 4
- 42.1 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 41.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 40.9 o1
- 39.5 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 38.9 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 38.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 37.7 Grok 4 Fast
- 37.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 36.8 o4-mini
- 36.0 GPT-4o
- 34.3 GPT-5 nano
- 33.9 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 26.4 Claude Sonnet 4
- 1
Gemini 4 Argon high 83.3
- 2 GPT-6 Astra high 83.0
- 3 GPT-6.1 Sol high 77.9
- 4 Claude Opus 5.5 high 76.8
- 5
Muse Wonder high 71.2
- 6
Gemini 3.8 Flash high 69.9
- 7 Claude Fable 5.1 high 68.9
- 8
Gemini 3.7 Flash high 68.7
- 9 Claude Opus 5 high 68.0
- 10 Claude Fable 5 high 66.6
- 11 GPT-5.6 Sol high 66.4
- 12
Gemini 3.5 Flash 64.6
- 13 GPT-5.5 high 64.3
- 14
Gemini 3.1 Pro high 62.1
- 15 Kimi K3 high 60.6
- 16
Muse Spark 1.1 high 60.1
- 17
Muse Spark Open high 59.4
- 18
Gemini 3 Flash high 59.3
- 19 GPT-5.4 high 57.7
- 20
Gemini 3 Pro high 57.1
- 21 Grok 4.5 56.2
- 22 Kimi K2.6 55.3
- 23 GPT-5.6 Terra high 55.1
- 24 GPT-5.6 Luna high 53.7
- 25 Claude Opus 4.8 high 53.0
- 26 GPT-5.2 high 52.2
- 27 Claude Opus 4.7 51.2
- 28 Grok 4.20 48.5
- 29 Grok 4.3 48.4
- 30 GPT-5 high 47.8
- 31 Claude Opus 4.6 47.7
- 32 GPT-5 mini high 47.5
- 33 GPT-5.1 high 47.4
- 34 GPT-5.4 Mini high 46.6
- 35 o3 high 46.5
- 36 Claude Sonnet 4.6 46.3
- 37
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, high 45.7
- 38 Claude Opus 4.5 thinking 45.4
- 39
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite high 44.7
- 40 Grok 4 42.5
- 41 Claude Sonnet 4.5 thinking 42.1
- 42
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025, high 41.1
- 43 o1 40.9
- 44 Grok 4.1 Fast 39.5
- 45 GPT-5.4 Nano high 38.9
- 46
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025, high 38.1
- 47 Grok 4 Fast 37.7
- 48 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 37.5
- 49 o4-mini high 36.8
- 50 GPT-4o Nov 2024 36.0
- 51 GPT-5 nano high 34.3
- 52 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 33.9
- 53 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 26.4
Source: Official CAIS Vision Capabilities Index leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 83.3 | high | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | 83.0 | high | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 77.9 | high | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 76.8 | high | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 71.2 | high | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 69.9 | high | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 68.9 | high | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 68.7 | high | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5 | 68.0 | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Fable 5 | 66.6 | high | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 66.4 | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 64.6 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GPT-5.5 | 64.3 | high | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 62.1 | high | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Kimi K3 | 60.6 | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 60.1 | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 59.4 | high | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | | 59.3 | high | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GPT-5.4 | 57.7 | high | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 57.1 | high | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Grok 4.5 | 56.2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Kimi K2.6 | 55.3 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 55.1 | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 53.7 | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 53.0 | high | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | GPT-5.2 | 52.2 | high | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 51.2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Grok 4.20 | 48.5 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | Grok 4.3 | 48.4 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | GPT-5 | 47.8 | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 47.7 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | GPT-5 mini | 47.5 | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | GPT-5.1 | 47.4 | high | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 46.6 | high | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | o3 | 46.5 | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 36 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 46.3 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 45.7 | high | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 38 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 45.4 | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 39 | | 44.7 | high | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | Grok 4 | 42.5 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 42.1 | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | | 41.1 | high | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 43 | o1 | 40.9 | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 39.5 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 38.9 | high | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 46 | | 38.1 | high | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 47 | Grok 4 Fast | 37.7 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 37.5 | thinking | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 49 | o4-mini | 36.8 | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 50 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 36.0 | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | GPT-5 nano | 34.3 | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 52 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 33.9 | thinking | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 53 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 26.4 | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
12 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in December 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CAIS Vision Capabilities Index leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official CAIS Vision Capabilities Index leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Other
- Personal Superintelligence Index (Meta) In use Meta's composite of seven personal and knowledge-work evals: Agents' Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, FocusBench, JobBench, GDP.pdf, VBT and DRACO.
- Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 In use Version 5 of Artificial Analysis's index: nine evaluations in four equal categories, most with private test sets, run three times each in its own agent harness.
Gemini 4 Carbon 59.0
- SAGE v1.1 (Vals) In use Models grade handwritten undergraduate math and computer science work against rubrics. Scored by class-balanced accuracy of each rubric check against expert grading. Claude Opus 5.5 91.3%
- MTEB Fading Massive Text Embedding Benchmark: retrieval, clustering, classification across languages and modalities.
sonar 42%
- Anthropic ECI (AECI) Only in system cards Index that combines a basket of capability benchmarks into one capability score to track trends across Anthropic models. Claude Opus 5.5 169.4
- SPEED-Bench Only in system cards Measures speculative decoding across varied prompts and domains. Reports the average acceptance length of draft tokens, so higher means faster generation at the same output.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 5.15