Benchmark Almanac

Child safety evaluations (Anthropic)

Only in system cards

Models answer single-turn and multi-turn prompts about child sexualization and grooming. Score is the appropriate response rate.

In-house Anthropic evaluation. The tasks are not public.

Made by
Anthropic
Released
February 2025
Kind
Refusing harmful requests
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Last in a system card
November 2026
Last model added
November 2026
17
System cards report it, from 1 lab

No scores here yet

No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for Child safety evaluations (Anthropic) yet.

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

17 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 system card Child safety, API without a system prompt: single-turn harmless rate 99.31%, benign refusal rate 0%, multi-turn appropriate response rate 90%. Claude.ai: 99.17%, 0%, 100%. No overall (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Oct 7, 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 system card Child safety, API without system prompt: single-turn harmless rate 99.29, benign refusal rate 0.04, multi-turn appropriate rate 96, no overall (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Sep 28, 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card Child safety, no overall: API single-turn harmless 99.57%, benign refusal 0.01%, multi-turn appropriate 86% (claude.ai 99.69%, 0%, 98%) (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Sep 22, 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card Child safety, no overall. API without a system prompt: single-turn harmless 99.14%, benign refusal 0%, multi-turn appropriate 84% (claude.ai 99.81%, 0.05%, 99%) (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Sep 1, 2026 Claude Fable 5.1 system card Child safety, API without a system prompt: single-turn harmless rate 99.90%, benign refusal rate 0%, multi-turn appropriate response rate 84%; claude.ai: 99.98%, 0.17%, 100%; no overall (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Jul 24, 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card Child safety, no overall. API without a system prompt: single-turn harmless 100.00%, benign refusal 0.15%, multi-turn appropriate 86% (claude.ai 100.00%, 0.19%, 99%) (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Jun 30, 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card Child safety, no overall. API without a system prompt: single-turn harmless 99.95%, benign refusal 0.63%, multi-turn appropriate 88% (claude.ai 99.89%, 1.35%, 96%) (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Jun 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card Child safety, API without a system prompt: single-turn harmless rate 100%, benign refusal rate 0.00%, multi-turn appropriate response rate 88%; claude.ai 100%, 0.12% and 96%, no overall (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
May 28, 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card Child safety, no overall. API without a system prompt: single-turn harmless 99.90%, benign refusal 0.45%, multi-turn appropriate 91% (claude.ai 99.99%, 0.27%, 95%) (Tables 4.2.A and 4.2.B) Safety
Apr 16, 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 system card Child safety, no overall: single-turn harmless rate 99.92, single-turn benign refusal rate 0.01, multi-turn appropriate response rate 95 (Table 4.4.1.A) Safety
Apr 7, 2026 Claude Mythos Preview system card Child safety, single-turn harmless rate 99.87, single-turn benign refusal rate 0.04, multi-turn appropriate response rate 98, no overall (Table 8.1.4.1.A) Safety
Feb 17, 2026 Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card Child safety, single-turn harmless rate 99.96, single-turn benign refusal rate 0.08, multi-turn appropriate response rate 95, no overall (Table 3.4.1.A) Safety
Feb 5, 2026 Claude Opus 4.6 system card Child safety, single-turn harmless rate 99.95, single-turn benign refusal rate 0.18, multi-turn appropriate response rate 96, no overall (Table 3.4.1.A) Safety
Aug 5, 2025 Claude Opus 4.1 system card addendum Child safety evaluations, no number printed. Text says performance comparable to Claude Opus 4 (2.2) Safety
May 22, 2025 Claude Sonnet 4 system card Child safety evaluations, no number printed. Text says performance similar to Claude Sonnet 3.7 (2.5) Safety
May 22, 2025 Claude Opus 4 system card Child safety evaluations, no number printed. Text says performance similar to Claude Sonnet 3.7 (2.5) Safety
Feb 24, 2025 Claude 3.7 Sonnet system card Child safety evaluations, single-turn and multi-turn, no number printed. Text says performance commensurate with prior models (3.1) Safety

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%