Benchmark Almanac

CMMMU

GPT-4V(ision) (Playground) 43.7% tops its leaderboard Qwen-VL-Plus 36.8% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Multimodal models answer college-level questions in Chinese across many disciplines, following MMMU's annotation pattern.

Chinese-language counterpart of MMMU. 27 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Made by
M-A-P and collaborators
Released
January 2024
Kind
General visual questions
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Last model added
August 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

As the capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs) continue to advance, evaluating the performance of LMMs emerges as an increasing need. Additionally, there is an even larger gap in evaluating the advanced knowledge and reasoning abilities of LMMs in non-English contexts such as Chinese. We introduce CMMMU, a new Chinese Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding benchmark designed to evaluate LMMs on tasks demanding college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning in a Chinese context. CMMMU is inspired by and strictly follows the annotation and analysis pattern of MMMU. CMMMU includes 12k manually collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering, like its companion, MMMU. These questions span 30 subjects and comprise 39 highly heterogeneous image types, such as charts, diagrams, maps, tables, music sheets, and chemical structures. CMMMU focuses on complex perception and reasoning with domain-specific knowledge in the Chinese context. We evaluate 11 open-source LLMs and one proprietary GPT-4V(ision). Even GPT-4V only achieves accuracies of 42%, indicating a large space for improvement. CMMMU will boost the community to build the next-generation LMMs towards expert artificial intelligence and promote the democratization of LMMs by providing diverse language contexts.

Abstract of CMMMU: A Chinese Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark (arXiv:2401.11944, CC0)
14
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

GPT-4V(ision) (Playground) tops the leaderboard with 43.7%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen-VL-Plus, at 36.8%.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4V(ision) (Playground) 43.7%
  2. 2 Qwen-VL-Plus 36.8%
  3. 3 Yi-VL-34B 36.5%
  4. 4 Yi-VL-6B 35%
  5. 5 InternVL-Chat-V1-1 34%
  6. 6 Qwen-VL-Chat 31.3%
  7. 7 SPHINX-MoE 29.5%
  8. 8 InternVL-Chat-ViT-6B-Vicuna-7B 26.7%
  9. 9 InternVL-Chat-ViT-6B-Vicuna-13B 26.1%
  10. 10 Emu2-Chat 24.5%
  11. 11 CogAgent-Chat 23.6%
  12. 12 Chinese-LLaVA 23.4%
  13. 13 VisCPM 22.7%
  14. 14 mPLUG-Owl2 22.2%

Source: Official CMMMU leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4V(ision) (Playground) 43.7% Official leaderboard
2 Qwen-VL-Plus 36.8% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Yi-VL-34B 36.5% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
4 Yi-VL-6B 35% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL-Chat-V1-1 34% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen-VL-Chat 31.3% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
7 SPHINX-MoE 29.5% Official leaderboard
8 InternVL-Chat-ViT-6B-Vicuna-7B 26.7% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
9 InternVL-Chat-ViT-6B-Vicuna-13B 26.1% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Emu2-Chat 24.5% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
11 CogAgent-Chat 23.6% Official leaderboard
12 Chinese-LLaVA 23.4% Official leaderboard
13 VisCPM 22.7% Official leaderboard
14 mPLUG-Owl2 22.2% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in January 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

01.AI Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2024
Qwen-VL-Plus 36.8%

Source: Official CMMMU leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen-VL-Plus Qwen-VL-Chat 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen-VL-Plus

Source: Official CMMMU leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%