ChartQA
Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Top models score near 90 percent, so it is close to saturation.
- Made by
- York University and Nanyang Technological University
- Released
- March 2022
- Kind
- Documents, charts and text in images
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) #149 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
In the authors’ words
Charts are very popular for analyzing data. When exploring charts, people often ask a variety of complex reasoning questions that involve several logical and arithmetic operations. They also commonly refer to visual features of a chart in their questions. However, most existing datasets do not focus on such complex reasoning questions as their questions are template-based and answers come from a fixed-vocabulary. In this work, we present a large-scale benchmark covering 9.6K human-written questions as well as 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries. To address the unique challenges in our benchmark involving visual and logical reasoning over charts, we present two transformer-based models that combine visual features and the data table of the chart in a unified way to answer questions. While our models achieve the state-of-the-art results on the previous datasets as well as on our benchmark, the evaluation also reveals several challenges in answering complex reasoning questions.
Command A Vision leads with 90.9% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 90.9
Command A Vision
- 90.8 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 90.8 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 90.3
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 90.3
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 90.0
Llama 4 Maverick
- 89.7
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 89.5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 89.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 89.1
Seed1.6-Thinking
- 88.8
Llama 4 Scout
- 88.0
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 87.8
ERNIE 5.0
- 87.6
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 87.4
Mistral Small 3.2
- 87.2
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 87.1
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking
- 86.8
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 86.3
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1
- 86.2
Mistral Small 3.1
- 85.7 GPT-4o
- 85.3
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 83.3
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B
- 82.6
Mistral Medium 3
- 81.8 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 81.7 Claude 3 Haiku
- 81.4
Phi-4-multimodal
- 81.3
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 81.3 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 81.1 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 80.8
Gemini 1.0 Ultra
- 80.8 Claude 3 Opus
- 80.8
North Micro Vision Instruct
- 78.5 GPT-4
- 78.0
Gemma 3 27B
- 75.7
Gemma 3 12B
- 68.8
Gemma 3 4B
- 1
Command A Vision 90.9%
- 2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 90.8%
- 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 90.8%
- 4
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 90.3%
- 5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 90.3%
- 6
Llama 4 Maverick 90%
- 7
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 89.7%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 89.5%
- 9
Seed1.5-VL 89.1%
- 10
Seed1.6-Thinking 89.1%
- 11
Llama 4 Scout 88.8%
- 12
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 88%
- 13
ERNIE 5.0 87.8%
- 14
LongCat-Flash-Omni 87.6%
- 15
Mistral Small 3.2 87.4%
- 16
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 87.2%
- 17
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 87.1%
- 18
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 86.8%
- 19
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 86.3%
- 20
Mistral Small 3.1 86.2%
- 21 GPT-4o May 2024 85.7%
- 22
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 85.3%
- 23
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 83.3%
- 24
Mistral Medium 3 82.6%
- 25 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 81.8%
- 26 Claude 3 Haiku 81.7%
- 27
Phi-4-multimodal 81.4%
- 28
Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 81.3%
- 29 LFM2.5-VL-3B 81.3%
- 30 Claude 3 Sonnet 81.1%
- 31
Gemini 1.0 Ultra 80.8%
- 32 Claude 3 Opus 80.8%
- 33
North Micro Vision Instruct 80.8%
- 34 GPT-4 Mar 2023 78.5%
- 35
Gemma 3 27B 78%
- 36
Gemma 3 12B 75.7%
- 37
Gemma 3 4B 68.8%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.9% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 90.8% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 90.8% | Oct 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 90.3% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 90.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 90% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 89.7% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 89.5% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 89.1% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 89.1% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 88.8% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 88% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 87.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 87.6% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 87.4% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 87.2% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 87.1% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 86.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 86.3% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 86.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 85.7% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 85.3% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 83.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 82.6% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 81.8% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | Claude 3 Haiku | 81.7% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 81.4% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 81.3% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 81.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 81.1% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 80.8% | Dec 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | Claude 3 Opus | 80.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 80.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 78.5% | Mar 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 78% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | | 75.7% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 37 | | 68.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
8 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
OpenAI’s own number for GPT-4o passed 85% in May 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 81.3 | ChartQA (test) |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 80.8 | ChartQA Test | |
| Mar 4, 2026 | 83.3 | ChartQA_TEST (default mode) | |
| Feb 6, 2026 | 87.8 | ChartQA | |
| Nov 11, 2025 | 87.1 | ChartQA | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 87.6 | ChartQA | |
| Oct 28, 2025 | 89.7 | ChartQA (test) | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 86.8 | ChartQA_test | |
| Jul 31, 2025 | 90.9 | ChartQA | |
| Jun 25, 2025 | 89.1 | ChartQA | |
| Jun 20, 2025 | 87.4 | ChartQA | |
| Jun 3, 2025 | 86.3 | ChartQA | |
| May 12, 2025 | 89.1 | ChartQA | |
| May 7, 2025 | 82.6 | ChartQA 0-shot | |
| Apr 5, 2025 | 88.8 | ChartQA, relaxed_accuracy | |
| Apr 5, 2025 | 90 | ChartQA, relaxed_accuracy | |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 85.3 | ChartQAtest Avg | |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 86.2 | ChartQA | |
| Mar 16, 2025 | ChartQA | ||
| Mar 12, 2025 | 78 | ChartQA (IT); PT = 76.3 | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | 81.4 | ChartQA | |
| Jan 28, 2025 | 89.5 | ChartQA_TEST | |
| Oct 22, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 90.8 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy) |
| Jun 20, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 90.8 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy) |
| May 14, 2024 | 87.2 | ChartQA (test), 0-shot | |
| May 13, 2024 | GPT-4o | 85.7 | ChartQA (%) (test) |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Opus | 80.8 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy) CoT |
| Feb 15, 2024 | 81.3 | ChartQA (test), 0-shot | |
| Dec 6, 2023 | 80.8 | ChartQA (test) | |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GPT-4 | 78.5 | ChartQA Relaxed accuracy (test) |
23 system cards report it, from 10 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 90.3 | ChartQA (Test), reasoning on, 89.9 reasoning off (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2026 | | 83.3 | ChartQA TEST, default mode, 76.5 force nothink, 82.9 force thinking (Tables 5 and 6) | Capabilities |
| Feb 4, 2026 | | 87.8 | ChartQA (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 90.3 | ChartQA test (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 84.9 | ChartQA (Test), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 89.8 | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 87.6 | ChartQA (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 86.8 | ChartQA test Avg., Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 89.5 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 88 | ChartQA (test avg) (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 89.1 | ChartQA, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 87.4 | Capabilities |
| Apr 5, 2025 | | 88.8 | ChartQA, 0-shot, relaxed_accuracy, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities |
| Apr 5, 2025 | | 90 | ChartQA, 0-shot, relaxed_accuracy, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities |
| Mar 26, 2025 | | 85.3 | ChartQA test Avg (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 68.8 | ChartQA, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 78 | ChartQA, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 75.7 | ChartQA, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 3, 2025 | | 81.4 | ChartQA (test) (Table 1). Speech-prompt ShareGPT4o ChartQA 69.0 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 89.5 | ChartQA test Avg. (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Oct 22, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) model card | 90.8 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy), 0-shot CoT (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 81.8 | ChartQA (test) (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jun 20, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet model card | 90.8 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy), 0-shot CoT (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Sonnet model card | 81.1 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy), 0-shot CoT (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Opus model card | 80.8 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy), 0-shot CoT (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Haiku model card | 81.7 | ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy), 0-shot CoT (Table 3) | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%