CursorBench 3.2
Agents do ambiguous multi-file coding tasks from real Cursor sessions in Cursor's harness. Version 3.2 added instruction following and advanced tool use problems. Agentic graders score correctness.
Cursor's changelog dates it July 8th, 2026. It changed the task mix, so scores do not compare with 3.1. xAI's Grok 4.6 card and Anthropic's Fable 5.1 card name this version.
- Made by
- Cursor
- Released
- July 2026
- Kind
- Fixing real repositories
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5.1 #7 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026
- Last model added
- September 2026
Claude Fable 5.1 leads with 73.4%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 Claude Fable 5.1 73.4%
- 2 Grok 4.6 70.8%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 73.4% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Grok 4.6 | 70.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card |
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in July 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 73.4 | Agentic coding CursorBench 3.2.0 |
| Aug 12, 2026 | Grok 4.6 | 69.9 | CursorBench v3.2 |
2 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 73.4 | CursorBench 3.2.0 at max effort, measured by Cursor; 68.0% at medium effort (8.8) | Capabilities |
| Aug 12, 2026 | Grok 4.6 model card | 70.8 | CursorBench 3.2, xhigh, Cursor agent harness, run by Cursor (2.1 text). High = 69.9% | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Sources: Official leaderboards, boards copied by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) and labs’ model cards
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471