Benchmark Almanac

Cyber key skills benchmark v1

Gemini 3 Pro 91.7% leads since November 2025
Only in system cards

Agents solve 50 capture-the-flag challenges built with a third party on reconnaissance, tool development, tool use and operational security. 12 are hard.

In-house Google evaluation built with Irregular. The Gemini 4 report renames key skills CyScenarioBench, kept separate because versions differ.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Capture-the-flag challenges
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last in a system card
November 2025
Last model added
November 2025

In the authors’ words

As frontier AI models become more capable, evaluating their potential to enable cyberattacks is crucial for ensuring the safe development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Current cyber evaluation efforts are often ad-hoc, lacking systematic analysis of attack phases and guidance on targeted defenses. This work introduces a novel evaluation framework that addresses these limitations by: (1) examining the end-to-end attack chain, (2) identifying gaps in AI threat evaluation, and (3) helping defenders prioritize targeted mitigations and conduct AI-enabled adversary emulation for red teaming. Our approach adapts existing cyberattack chain frameworks for AI systems. We analyzed over 12,000 real-world instances of AI involvement in cyber incidents, catalogued by Google's Threat Intelligence Group, to curate seven representative attack chain archetypes. Through a bottleneck analysis on these archetypes, we pinpointed phases most susceptible to AI-driven disruption. We then identified and utilized externally developed cybersecurity model evaluations focused on these critical phases. We report on AI's potential to amplify offensive capabilities across specific attack stages, and offer recommendations for prioritizing defenses. We believe this represents the most comprehensive AI cyber risk evaluation framework published to date.

Abstract of A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI (arXiv:2503.11917, CC0)
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 91.7% among models released by November 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 91.7%
  2. 2 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 50%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 33.3%
  4. 4 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 8.30%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 91.7% Nov 2025 Lab model card
2 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 50% Jul 2025 Lab model card
3 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 33.3% Apr 2025 Lab model card
4 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 8.30% Jul 2025 Lab model card

3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Lab claims Passed 85% in Nov 2025, by Gemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3 Pro 91.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Google DeepMind’s own number for Gemini 3 Pro passed 85% in November 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 18, 2025 Gemini 3 Pro system card 91.7 Key skills benchmark v1, hard challenges solved: 11/12, alert threshold met (FSF table p.5, Figure 2) Cyber risk
Jul 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 50 Key skills benchmark (48 challenges), hard challenges solved 6/12; easy 7/8, medium 14/28 (Table 10; Figure 11 prints 15/28 medium) Cyber risk
Jul 7, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 8.3 Key skills benchmark (48 challenges), hard challenges solved 1/12; easy 6/8, medium 8/28 (Figure 11 bar labels) Cyber risk
Apr 28, 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro model card 33.3 New comprehensive benchmark (50 challenges), hard challenges solved 4/12; very easy 2/2, easy 6/8, medium 11/28 (Table 1, Figure 3) Cyber risk

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%