Benchmark Almanac

Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025

Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks first on 11 of the 65 benchmarks with five or more models scored.

Google DeepMind Released March 25th, 2025 Family Gemini 2.5 The lab's model card Compare with others
70
Benchmarks with a score
11
Ranked first, out of five or more models
26
In the top three
Google DeepMind Mar 2025

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Mar 2025 snapshot Closed weights Flagship

143.9 #103 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 143.1 #151 of 404
  • Humanity's Last Exam 18.2% #22 /47
  • GPQA Diamond 83.8% #84 /229
  • LiveCodeBench v5 70.4% #12 /47

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMBench-CN v1.1 88.1% #1 of 178 Official leaderboard
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) 1.10% #4 of 148 Official leaderboard
LongBench v2 63.3% #1 of 33 Official leaderboard
BuzzBench 71.1 #1 of 20 Official leaderboard
LLM Confabulation Leaderboard 10.8% #3 of 58 Official leaderboard
Global MMLU Lite 89.8% #1 of 16 Lab model card
FaithJudge 7.63% #3 of 37 Official leaderboard
MRCR (Michelangelo, original) 94.5% #1 of 9 Lab model card
Arena-Hard v2.0 79% #3 of 23 Official leaderboard
SimpleQA 52.9% #12 of 60 Lab model card
Fiction.LiveBench 66.7% #23 of 57 Fiction.live leaderboard, via Epoch AI
Humanity's Last Exam 18.2% #22 of 47 Official leaderboard

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
PolyMath 52.2% #2 of 38 Official leaderboard
AIME 2024 92% #9 of 88 Lab model card
MATH Level 5 95.6% #11 of 94 Epoch AI run
Putnam-like 94.5% #1 of 6 Official leaderboard
PHYBench 36.9% #5 of 28 Official leaderboard
USAMO 2025 24.4% #2 of 10 Official leaderboard
Misguided Attention 55.2% #12 of 45 Official leaderboard
GPQA Diamond 83.8% #84 of 229 Epoch AI run
HMMT 2025 82.5% #22 of 53 Official leaderboard
PutnamBench 0.45% #5 of 12 Official leaderboard
GSM8K Platinum Initial 268 99.3% #8 of 19 Official leaderboard
UGMathBench 80.6% #3 of 7 Official leaderboard
AIME 2025 86.7% #65 of 143 Lab model card
SMT 2025 84.9% #20 of 40 Official leaderboard
BRUMO 2025 90% #22 of 42 Official leaderboard
SimpleBench 51.6% #58 of 106 Official leaderboard
CMIMC 2025 58.1% #32 of 33 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
BigCodeBench-Hard 33.1% #6 of 96 Official leaderboard
Multi-SWE-bench 14.2% #1 of 11 Official leaderboard
LiveCodeBench v5 70.4% #12 of 47 Lab model card
Aider Polyglot 74% #8 of 30 Lab model card
SWE-bench Verified 63.8% #102 of 155 Lab model card

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
ToolComp 68.8% #2 of 32 Official leaderboard
Galileo Agent Leaderboard 0.94 #2 of 29 Official leaderboard
Step Race 4 #9 of 59 Official leaderboard
VideoGameBench 0.48% #1 of 5 Official leaderboard
BALROG 43.3% #11 of 33 Official leaderboard
VideoGameBench Lite 1.60% #3 of 5 Official leaderboard
LLM Chess -144 #88 of 123 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
CadEval 64% #2 of 13 Official leaderboard
HealthBench 52% #3 of 8 Official leaderboard
HealthBench Hard 18.5% #3 of 8 Official leaderboard
Vending-Bench $789 #9 of 9 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMBench-EN v1.1 88.5% #1 of 178 Official leaderboard
MMStar 73.6% #2 of 173 Official leaderboard
VISTA 54.6% #1 of 54 Official leaderboard
MMMU 81.7% #13 of 103 Lab model card
GeoBench 84% #7 of 48 Official leaderboard
MATH-Vision (MathVision) 73.3% #22 of 105 Official leaderboard
Vibe-Eval 69.4% #2 of 9 Lab model card
VPCT 48% #8 of 27 VPCT leaderboard, via Epoch AI

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
InterCode-CTF 98.7% #1 of 4 Lab model card
Virology Capabilities Test (VCT) 37.6% #2 of 7 Official leaderboard
Hack the Box challenge set (Google DeepMind) 7.70% #2 of 4 Lab model card
In-house CTF suite (Phuong et al. 2024) 76.9% #2 of 4 Lab model card
WMDP Chemistry 75.3% #4 of 7 Lab model card
LAB-Bench ProtocolQA 69% #12 of 16 Lab model card
LAB-Bench CloningScenarios 44.1% #9 of 12 Lab model card
WMDP Biology 84.3% #6 of 8 Lab model card
Cyber key skills benchmark v1 33.3% #3 of 4 Lab model card
SecureBio VMQA, single choice 50.8% #3 of 4 Lab model card
FORTRESS 54.9% #63 of 73 Official leaderboard
GDM Situational Awareness 18.2% #7 of 8 Lab model card
LAB-Bench SeqQA 63.9% #11 of 12 Lab model card
GDM Stealth 20% #6 of 6 Lab model card

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
OpenVLM Leaderboard 80.1 #1 of 173 Official leaderboard
CAIS Risk Index 59.0 #49 of 67 Official leaderboard
CAIS Text Capabilities Index 18.8 #53 of 68 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 143.1, in line with its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 12 capability results Google DeepMind reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 140.9 to 145.4. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 4 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
AIME 2025 86.7% AIME 2025, single attempt (pass@1) 88.3% Leaderboard −1.6 pts
Aider Polyglot 74% Aider Polyglot, whole (diff = 68.6%) 72.9% Leaderboard, aider, diff-fenced edits +1.1 pts
Humanity's Last Exam 18.8% Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) 18.2% Leaderboard +0.6 pts
GPQA Diamond 84% GPQA diamond, single attempt (pass@1) 83.8% Epoch AI run +0.2 pts

Google DeepMind's models over time

Google DeepMind's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Gemini 4 Carbon Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 1.5 Pro 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Gemini 4 Carbon Gemini 3.8 Flash

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 19 of them aren't in the launch post.

AI R&D risk