Benchmark Almanac

CyberGym (final-submission metric)

In use

Agents reproduce the same 1,507 real vulnerabilities as CyberGym, but a task counts as solved only if the one proof-of-concept the agent picks as final triggers the bug.

The maker's FAQ (added July 1st, 2026) says the earlier any-of metric increasingly rewards brute force, and the leaderboard now requires the final-submission metric. Microsoft reports 96% any-crash, 90.4% any-of and 86.3% final-submission for one system, so the metrics are not comparable.

Released
July 2026
Kind
Finding and exploiting real bugs
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
July 2026
Last model added
July 2026

In the authors’ words

AI agents have significant potential to reshape cybersecurity, making a thorough assessment of their capabilities critical. However, existing evaluations fall short, because they are based on small-scale benchmarks and only measure static outcomes, failing to capture the full, dynamic range of real-world security challenges. To address these limitations, we introduce CyberGym, a large-scale benchmark featuring 1,507 real-world vulnerabilities across 188 software projects. Adjustable to different vulnerability analysis settings, CyberGym primarily tasks agents with generating a proof-of-concept test that reproduces a vulnerability, given only its text description and the corresponding codebase. Our extensive evaluation highlights that CyberGym effectively differentiates agents' and models' cybersecurity capabilities. Even the top-performing combinations only achieve a ~20% success rate, demonstrating the overall difficulty of CyberGym. Beyond static benchmarking, we show that CyberGym leads to the discovery of 34 zero-day vulnerabilities and 18 historically incomplete patches. These results underscore that CyberGym is not only a robust benchmark for measuring AI's progress in cybersecurity but also a platform for creating direct, real-world security impact.

Abstract of CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale (arXiv:2506.02548, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

MAI-Cyber-1-Flash leads with 86.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash 86.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash 86.3% Jul 2026 Lab model card

Microsoft’s own number for MAI-Cyber-1-Flash passed 85% in July 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Cyber-1-Flash 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Cyber-1-Flash

Source: Labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jul 27, 2026 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash 86.3 CyberGym final-submission score on the CyberGym leaderboard, MDASH system

Versions

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%