DeepSeek LLM in-house safety evaluation
Models answer 2,400 Chinese test cases on discrimination, legal rights, trade secrets, illegal behavior and other safety issues. Human annotators judge each answer.
In-house DeepSeek evaluation. Results are safe answers out of total cases per category.
- Made by
- DeepSeek
- Released
- January 2024
- Kind
- Refusing harmful requests
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by people
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Last in a system card
- January 2024
- Last model added
- January 2024
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for DeepSeek LLM in-house safety evaluation yet.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2024 |  DeepSeek LLM 67B technical report | In-house safety taxonomy, safe answers / total cases by category, no overall: Discrimination 486/500, Legal rights 473/500, Trade secrets and IP 281/300, Illegal behavior 290/300, Other 767/800 (Table 10) | Safety |
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6% - Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts.
Gemini 4 Carbon 0% - DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics.
Muse Spark 1.2 88.4% - Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
- IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%