Benchmark Almanac

DISBench

Claude Opus 4.5 28.7% leads since February 2026
Not in model cards

Multimodal agents search raw visual histories over several steps to find target images from implicit context cues.

51 HF paper upvotes.

Released
February 2026
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
Last model added
December 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Existing multimodal retrieval systems excel at semantic matching but implicitly assume that query-image relevance can be measured in isolation. This paradigm overlooks the rich dependencies inherent in realistic visual streams, where information is distributed across temporal sequences rather than confined to single snapshots. To bridge this gap, we introduce DeepImageSearch, a novel agentic paradigm that reformulates image retrieval as an autonomous exploration task. Models must plan and perform multi-step reasoning over raw visual histories to locate targets based on implicit contextual cues. We construct DISBench, a challenging benchmark built on interconnected visual data. To address the scalability challenge of creating context-dependent queries, we propose a human-model collaborative pipeline that employs vision-language models to mine latent spatiotemporal associations, effectively offloading intensive context discovery before human verification. Furthermore, we build a robust baseline using a modular agent framework equipped with fine-grained tools and a dual-memory system for long-horizon navigation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DISBench poses significant challenges to state-of-the-art models, highlighting the necessity of incorporating agentic reasoning into next-generation retrieval systems.

Abstract of DeepImageSearch: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Context-Aware Image Retrieval in Visual Histories (arXiv:2602.10809, CC0)
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

Claude Opus 4.5 leads with 28.7% among models released by December 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.5 Standard 28.7%
  2. 2 Gemini 3 Pro Standard 24.6%
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Standard 22.1%
  4. 4 GPT-5.2 Standard 13.1%
  5. 5 Gemini 3 Flash Standard 12.3%
  6. 6 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct Standard 11.5%
  7. 7 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B Standard 8.20%
  8. 8 Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct Standard 8.20%
  9. 9 GLM-4.6V Standard 8.20%
  10. 10 Gpt-4o [snapshot unspecified] Standard 5.70%

Source: Official DISBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.5 28.7% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Pro 24.6% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Sonnet 4.5 22.1% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.2 13.1% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3 Flash 12.3% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 11.5% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 8.20% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct 8.20% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GLM-4.6V 8.20% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Gpt-4o [snapshot unspecified] 5.70% Standard, ImageSeeker; retriever Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B Nov 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Feb 2026

Source: Official DISBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5

Source: Official DISBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%