ECLeKTic
Models answer 384 closed-book questions, translated into 12 languages, about facts found in only one language's Wikipedia. Scoring checks transfer across languages.
- Made by
- Google Research and Google DeepMind
- Released
- February 2025
- Kind
- Knowledge in many languages
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- o3 #83 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- June 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- May 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
To achieve equitable performance across languages, large language models (LLMs) must be able to abstract knowledge beyond the language in which it was learnt. However, the current literature lacks reliable ways to measure LLMs' capability of such cross-lingual knowledge transfer. To that end, we present ECLeKTic, a multilingual closed-book QA dataset that Evaluates Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer in a simple, black-box manner. Concretely, we used the presence and absence of Wikipedia articles in 12 languages to detect pieces of information that were likely available during pre-training in one of the languages but not in the others. We curate ECLeKTic as a set of fact-seeking questions over this kind of information, in all the different languages. Therefore, in order to solve ECLeKTic the model is required to transfer knowledge between languages. We evaluated 8 LLMs and showed that current SOTA models struggle to effectively share knowledge across languages, even if they can predict the answer for questions in the language in which the knowledge was acquired.
Claude Mythos Preview leads with 56.3% among models released by April 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
o3 leads with 43.1% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Claude Mythos Preview leads with 56.3%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Claude Mythos Preview 56.3%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 46.8%
- 3
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 36.8%
- 4
Gemma 3 27B 16.7%
- 5
Gemma 3 12B 10.3%
- 6
Gemma 3 4B 4.60%
- 7
Gemma 3 1B 1.40%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 43.1 o3
- 40.1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 38.7 o1
- 36.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 34.2 GPT-4.1
- 30.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 29.9 GPT-4o
- 29.0 Grok 3
- 24.6
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 24.0 Claude Opus 4
- 23.3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 22.6 o4-mini
- 22.0
DeepSeek-V3
- 20.2
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 20.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 19.0
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 18.5 Claude Sonnet 4
- 18.4 Grok-2
- 17.5
DeepSeek-R1
- 17.1 Grok-3 mini
- 14.5 o3-mini
- 13.4
Mistral Large 2
- 12.4 GPT-4o mini
- 11.6
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 10.3 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 10.1 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 9.09
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
- 8.69 o1-mini
- 8.52
Mixtral 8x22B
- 8.45
Gemma 3 27B
- 6.20
Gemma 3 12B
- 3.98
Ministral 8B
- 3.20
Codestral
- 2.25
Gemma 3 4B
- 0.64
Ministral 3B
- 1 o3 43.1%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 40.1%
- 3 o1 38.7%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 36.9%
- 5 GPT-4.1 34.2%
- 6
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 30.9%
- 7 GPT-4o Mar 2025 29.9%
- 8 Grok 3 29%
- 9
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 24.6%
- 10 Claude Opus 4 24%
- 11 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 23.3%
- 12 o4-mini 22.6%
- 13
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 22%
- 14
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 20.2%
- 15 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20%
- 16
DeepSeek-V3.1 19%
- 17 Claude Sonnet 4 18.5%
- 18 Grok-2 Dec 2024 18.4%
- 19
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 17.5%
- 20 Grok-3 mini 17.1%
- 21 o3-mini 14.5%
- 22
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 13.4%
- 23 GPT-4o mini 12.4%
- 24
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 11.6%
- 25 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 10.3%
- 26 Claude 3.5 Haiku 10.1%
- 27
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B 9.09%
- 28 o1-mini 8.69%
- 29
Mixtral 8x22B 8.52%
- 30
Gemma 3 27B 8.45%
- 31
Gemma 3 12B 6.20%
- 32
Ministral 8B 3.98%
- 33
Codestral 3.20%
- 34
Gemma 3 4B 2.25%
- 35
Ministral 3B 0.64%
Source: Official ECLeKTic leaderboard
- 56.3 Claude Mythos Preview
- 46.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 43.1 o3
- 40.1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 38.7 o1
- 36.8
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 34.2 GPT-4.1
- 29.9 GPT-4o
- 29.0 Grok 3
- 24.6
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 24.0 Claude Opus 4
- 23.3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 22.6 o4-mini
- 22.0
DeepSeek-V3
- 20.2
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 20.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 19.0
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 18.5 Claude Sonnet 4
- 18.4 Grok-2
- 17.5
DeepSeek-R1
- 17.1 Grok-3 mini
- 16.7
Gemma 3 27B
- 14.5 o3-mini
- 13.4
Mistral Large 2
- 12.4 GPT-4o mini
- 11.6
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 10.3 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 10.3
Gemma 3 12B
- 10.1 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 9.09
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
- 8.69 o1-mini
- 8.52
Mixtral 8x22B
- 4.60
Gemma 3 4B
- 3.98
Ministral 8B
- 3.20
Codestral
- 1.40
Gemma 3 1B
- 0.64
Ministral 3B
- 1 Claude Mythos Preview 56.3%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 46.8%
- 3 o3 43.1%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 40.1%
- 5 o1 38.7%
- 6
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 36.8%
- 7 GPT-4.1 34.2%
- 8 GPT-4o Mar 2025 29.9%
- 9 Grok 3 29%
- 10
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 24.6%
- 11 Claude Opus 4 24%
- 12 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 23.3%
- 13 o4-mini 22.6%
- 14
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 22%
- 15
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 20.2%
- 16 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20%
- 17
DeepSeek-V3.1 19%
- 18 Claude Sonnet 4 18.5%
- 19 Grok-2 Dec 2024 18.4%
- 20
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 17.5%
- 21 Grok-3 mini 17.1%
- 22
Gemma 3 27B 16.7%
- 23 o3-mini 14.5%
- 24
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 13.4%
- 25 GPT-4o mini 12.4%
- 26
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 11.6%
- 27 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 10.3%
- 28
Gemma 3 12B 10.3%
- 29 Claude 3.5 Haiku 10.1%
- 30
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B 9.09%
- 31 o1-mini 8.69%
- 32
Mixtral 8x22B 8.52%
- 33
Gemma 3 4B 4.60%
- 34
Ministral 8B 3.98%
- 35
Codestral 3.20%
- 36
Gemma 3 1B 1.40%
- 37
Ministral 3B 0.64%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official ECLeKTic leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Mythos Preview | 56.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 46.8% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 36.8% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 16.7% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 10.3% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 4.60% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 1.40% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o3 | 43.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 40.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | o1 | 38.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 36.9% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-4.1 | 34.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 30.9% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 29.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Grok 3 | 29% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 24.6% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4 | 24% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 23.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | o4-mini | 22.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 22% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 20.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 20% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 19% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 18.5% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Grok-2 Dec 2024 | 18.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 17.5% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Grok-3 mini | 17.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | o3-mini | 14.5% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 13.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GPT-4o mini | 12.4% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 11.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 10.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 10.1% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 9.09% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | o1-mini | 8.69% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 8.52% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 8.45% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 6.20% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 3.98% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 3.20% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 2.25% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 0.64% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Mythos Preview | 56.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 46.8% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | o3 | 43.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 40.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o1 | 38.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 36.8% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-4.1 | 34.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 29.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Grok 3 | 29% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 24.6% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4 | 24% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 23.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | o4-mini | 22.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 22% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 20.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 20% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 19% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 18.5% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Grok-2 Dec 2024 | 18.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 17.5% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Grok-3 mini | 17.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 16.7% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | o3-mini | 14.5% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 13.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GPT-4o mini | 12.4% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 11.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 10.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 10.3% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 10.1% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 9.09% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | o1-mini | 8.69% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 8.52% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 4.60% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | | 3.98% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 3.20% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 1.40% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 37 | | 0.64% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 35 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in February 2025 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in February 2025 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in February 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official ECLeKTic leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official ECLeKTic leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since June 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | 1.9 | ECLeKTic score 0-shot (IT) | |
| Mar 12, 2025 | ECLeKTic (PT); IT 0-shot = 16.7 |
10 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | ECLeKTic full cross-lingual set (multilingual factual questions), net score 0.39 (correct minus incorrect), closed book, printed on chart (6.3.3.1, Figure 6.3.3.1.B) | Hallucination | |
| Apr 16, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | ECLeKTic multilingual, full cross-lingual set, net score (correct minus incorrect), closed book, printed on chart. Correct 35.4, unsure 53.3, incorrect 11.3 (6.3.3.1, Figures 6.3.3.1.A and B) | Hallucination | |
| Apr 7, 2026 | Claude Mythos Preview system card | 56.3 | Multilingual factual hallucinations, ECLeKTic full dataset including cross-lingual translations, correct rate, value printed on chart; unsure 31.5, incorrect 12.1 (4.3.3.2, Figure 4.3.3.2.A) | Hallucination |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.6 system card | ECLeKTic subset in original languages, net score (correct minus incorrect), extended thinking, value printed on chart; correct rate 53.9, net 34.6 with thinking plus effort (Figure 4.3.A) | Hallucination | |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 46.8 | ECLeKTic (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 36.8 | ECLeKTic (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 4.6 | ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 11.0 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 16.7 | ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 24.4 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 1.4 | ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 4.69 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 10.3 | ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 17.2 | Capabilities |
The lab's number comes out ahead in 5 of 5 pairs that differ
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 46.8% ECLeKTic (Table 3) | 36.9% Leaderboard | +9.9 pts |
| | 16.7% ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 24.4 | 8.45% Leaderboard | +8.2 pts |
| | 36.8% ECLeKTic (Table 3) | 30.9% Leaderboard | +5.9 pts |
| | 10.3% ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 17.2 | 6.20% Leaderboard | +4.1 pts |
| | 4.60% ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 11.0 | 2.25% Leaderboard | +2.4 pts |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%