Benchmark Almanac

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma 3 27B ranks first on 3 of the 132 benchmarks with five or more models scored.

Google DeepMind Released March 11th, 2025 Family Gemma 3 The lab's model card Compare with others
140
Benchmarks with a score
3
Ranked first, out of five or more models
10
In the top three
Google DeepMind Mar 2025

Gemma 3 27B

Open weights Open model

127.5 #164 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 120.6 #341 of 404
  • SWE-Bench Pro 11.4% #21 /24
  • GPQA Diamond 47.7% #164 /229
  • SimpleQA Verified 10.7% #46 /56

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MadinahQA 69.4% #1 of 39 Official leaderboard
ArabicMMLU 70.8% #2 of 39 Official leaderboard
Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard v2 71.4% #2 of 39 Official leaderboard
Alyah 74.7% #1 of 10 Official leaderboard
AlGhafa 77.9% #4 of 39 Official leaderboard
ArbMMLU-HT 66.9% #4 of 39 Official leaderboard
Flores 48.8 #1 of 8 Lab model card
QIMMA 63.8% #4 of 25 Official leaderboard
BIG-Bench Hard 87.6% #12 of 73 Lab model card
Global PIQA 81.7% #8 of 44 Official leaderboard
HELMET 44.5% #3 of 16 Official leaderboard
IFEval 90.4% #26 of 135 Lab model card
KoBALT 35% #3 of 12 Official leaderboard
IndicGenBench 63.4 #1 of 4 Lab model card
XQuAD 76.8 #1 of 4 Lab model card
TriviaQA 85.5% #11 of 40 Lab model card
SwitzerlandQA 71% #2 of 7 Official leaderboard
SIQA 54.9% #7 of 24 Lab model card
ARC-Easy 89% #7 of 23 Lab model card
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) 3.00% #46 of 148 Official leaderboard
BOUQuET 29.5 #6 of 18 Official leaderboard
MMBench-CN v1.1 78.2% #60 of 178 Official leaderboard
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (2025 dataset) 7.40% #36 of 104 Official leaderboard
Natural Questions 36.1% #7 of 20 Lab model card
AGIEval 66.2% #16 of 40 Lab model card
BoolQ 82.4% #12 of 28 Lab model card
PIQA 83.3% #16 of 37 Lab model card
HellaSwag 85.6% #25 of 53 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,365 #163 of 335 Official leaderboard
ALRAGE 73.3% #19 of 39 Official leaderboard
WinoGrande 78.8% #24 of 47 Lab model card
HUMAINE 27 #27 of 50 Official leaderboard
ECLeKTic 16.7% #4 of 7 Lab model card
MMLU 78.6% #81 of 131 Lab model card
SEA-HELM 64.5 #44 of 71 Official leaderboard
ARC-Challenge 70.6% #31 of 49 Lab model card
BIG-Bench Extra Hard 4.90% #7 of 11 Official leaderboard
EQ-Bench 3 1,105 #51 of 78 Official leaderboard
MRCR (Michelangelo, original) 59.3% #6 of 9 Lab model card
Structured Output Benchmark 84.7% #13 of 19 Official leaderboard
MGSM 74.3% #40 of 57 Lab model card
Creative Writing v3 58.7 #86 of 120 Official leaderboard
Wer wird Millionär? LLM Benchmark 289.0 #56 of 77 Official leaderboard
DROP 77.2% #31 of 41 Lab model card
MMLU-Pro 67.5% #129 of 167 Lab model card
Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) 41.9 #95 of 119 Official leaderboard
BBEH micro average 19.3% #12 of 15 Lab model card
SimpleQA Verified 10.7% #46 of 56 Official leaderboard
Slop Score 69.5 #14 of 17 Official leaderboard
Arena-Hard v2.0 15% #19 of 23 Official leaderboard
SimpleQA 10% #50 of 60 Lab model card
Global MMLU Lite 76.3% #36 of 43 Official leaderboard
FACTS Grounding 74.9% #13 of 15 Lab model card
FACTS Parametric 6.27% #40 of 45 Official leaderboard
RULER 66% #39 of 42 Lab model card
Phare 57.4% #59 of 62 Official leaderboard
Fiction.LiveBench 33.3% #55 of 57 Fiction.live leaderboard, via Epoch AI
FACTS Search 41.4% #30 of 31 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench 3.64% #105 of 107 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench V2 3.00% #127 of 129 Official leaderboard
LLM Confabulation Leaderboard 40.3% #58 of 58 Official leaderboard

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GSM8K 95.9% #8 of 92 Lab model card
MATH 89% #12 of 99 Lab model card
MATH Level 5 74% #31 of 94 Epoch AI run
HiddenMath 60.3% #5 of 11 Lab model card
GPQA Diamond 47.7% #164 of 229 Epoch AI run
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 22.5% #152 of 212 Epoch AI run
PolyMath 20.3% #33 of 38 Official leaderboard
DTBench 52.5% #157 of 180 Official leaderboard
Misguided Attention 23.4% #43 of 45 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HumanEval 87.8% #29 of 101 Lab model card
BigO(Bench) 37.6% #6 of 18 Official leaderboard
Natural2Code 84.5% #3 of 9 Lab model card
BigCodeBench-Hard 26% #42 of 96 Official leaderboard
MBPP 74.4% #36 of 71 Lab model card
SArena 0.83 #9 of 17 Official leaderboard
Bird-SQL 54.4% #8 of 13 Lab model card
ArtifactsBench (Gemini 2.5 Pro 0506 judge) 37.2% #12 of 18 Official leaderboard
LiveCodeBench 29.7% #44 of 54 Lab model card
SWE-Bench Pro 11.4% #21 of 24 Official leaderboard
Aider Polyglot 4.90% #45 of 46 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 59.1% #25 of 67 Official leaderboard
SnakeBench 25 #88 of 188 Official leaderboard
MCP-Bench 0.58 #8 of 15 Official leaderboard
BFCL V4 29.5% #40 of 65 Official leaderboard
LisanBench 175.3 #95 of 133 Official leaderboard
LLM-WikiRace 0% #18 of 21 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
BRIDGE 49.5 #9 of 39 Official leaderboard
MultiFinBen 15.7 #4 of 9 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MM-Vet 71% #18 of 164 Official leaderboard
A-Bench 76.3% #22 of 116 Official leaderboard
MMBench 82.3% #37 of 155 Official leaderboard
SEED-Bench-2-Plus 67% #39 of 136 Official leaderboard
EmbodiedBench EB-Navigation 45.4% #5 of 17 Official leaderboard
MMBench-EN v1.1 79.6% #56 of 178 Official leaderboard
CoreCognition 59.4% #38 of 119 Official leaderboard
MMMU 64.9% #45 of 136 Official leaderboard
COCO Captions 116.0 #1 of 3 Lab model card
OK-VQA 60.2% #1 of 3 Lab model card
MMStar 59.6% #61 of 173 Official leaderboard
EmbodiedBench EB-ALFRED 37% #6 of 17 Official leaderboard
CCBench (MMBench Chinese Culture) 53.3% #57 of 152 Official leaderboard
EmbodiedBench EB-Manipulation 17.5% #7 of 17 Official leaderboard
CSVQA 22.9% #6 of 12 Official leaderboard
ReMI 44.8% #2 of 4 Lab model card
TallyQA 54.3% #2 of 4 Lab model card
MATH-Vision (MathVision) 46% #56 of 105 Official leaderboard
MORSE-500 14.6% #6 of 11 Official leaderboard
SpaCE-10 41.5% #20 of 36 Official leaderboard
EmbodiedBench EB-Habitat 35.7% #10 of 17 Official leaderboard
Perception Test MCVQA 58.1% #4 of 6 Lab model card
SpatialSense VQA 59.4% #2 of 3 Lab model card
MathCanvas-Bench 15.8% #11 of 16 Official leaderboard
InfographicVQA 70.6% #18 of 26 Lab model card
Vision Arena 1,160 #96 of 136 Official leaderboard
MM-HELIX 16.6% #12 of 17 Official leaderboard
Math-VR 16.1% #19 of 26 Official leaderboard
ActivityNet-QA 52.8% #6 of 8 Lab model card
VQAv2 72.9% #6 of 8 Lab model card
MathVista 67.6% #53 of 70 Lab model card
AI2D 84.5% #40 of 52 Lab model card
GeoBench 52% #41 of 48 Official leaderboard
TextVQA 68.6% #15 of 17 Lab model card
MSEB 7.63 #8 of 9 Official leaderboard
CountBench 68% #26 of 28 Lab model card
BLINK 39.6% #27 of 29 Lab model card
DocVQA 86.6% #34 of 36 Lab model card
ChartQA 78% #35 of 37 Lab model card
RealWorldQA 53.9% #36 of 38 Lab model card
OmniAI OCR Benchmark 42.9% #4 of 4 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AraTrust 89.1% #3 of 39 Official leaderboard
Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) 57.9% #15 of 35 Official leaderboard
MolecularIQ 7.82% #9 of 17 Official leaderboard
nocot-bench (NCRI) 56.0 #152 of 185 Official leaderboard
Spiral-Bench v1.2 25.2 #18 of 21 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
OpenVLM Leaderboard 67.5 #47 of 173 Official leaderboard
Political Science LLM Benchmark 66% #27 of 42 Official leaderboard
ACCoRD 40.5 #132 of 152 Official leaderboard
LMCA 12.3% #130 of 147 Official leaderboard
Conceptual Reasoning Index 19.6 #136 of 151 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 120.6, 6.9 points below its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 42 capability results Google DeepMind reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 118.8 to 122.4. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 8 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap What differs
ECLeKTic 16.7% ECLeKTic score, IT, 0-shot (Table 18). PT 2-shot (Table 13): 24.4 8.45% Leaderboard +8.2 pts
FACTS Grounding 74.9% FACTS Grounding (IT) 80.6% Leaderboard −5.7 pts
GPQA Diamond 42.4% GPQA Diamond 0-shot (IT); PT GPQA 5-shot = 24.3 47.7% Epoch AI run −5.3 pts
LMArena (Elo) 1,338 Chatbot Arena Elo, IT, preliminary results received March 8, 2025 (Table 5) 1,365 Leaderboard −27 Google reports a preliminary March 2025 Arena rating, while the board reports a later rating from updated votes.
Global MMLU Lite 75.7% Global-MMLU-Lite (PT); IT 0-shot = 75.1 76.3% Leaderboard −0.6 pts
BBEH micro average 19.3% BIG-Bench Extra Hard 0-shot (IT) 18.8% Leaderboard +0.5 pts
MMLU-Pro 67.5% MMLU (Pro) 0-shot (IT); PT MMLU (Pro COT) 5-shot = 52.2 67.5% Leaderboard Same
MMMU 64.9% MMMU (val) (IT); PT MMMU = 56.1 64.9% Leaderboard Same

Google DeepMind's models over time

Google DeepMind's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Gemini 4 Carbon Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 1.5 Pro 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Gemini 4 Carbon Gemini 3.8 Flash

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 5 of them aren't in the launch post.