Benchmark Almanac

Ego3D-Bench

Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 7.20 tops its leaderboard Ovis2-16B 7.40 leads the models we track
Qwen3.7-Plus 5.90 leads since June 2026
In use

Models answer spatial reasoning questions about ego-centric multi-view scenes, such as those from self-driving cars. Some items ask for distances, scored by error.

Qwen reports a lower-is-better number for it, which matches the distance error metric.

Released
September 2025
Kind
Spatial reasoning and counting
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen3.7-Plus #78 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
June 2026
Last model added
June 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Understanding 3D spatial relationships remains a major limitation of current Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Prior work has addressed this issue by creating spatial question-answering (QA) datasets based on single images or indoor videos. However, real-world embodied AI agents such as robots and self-driving cars typically rely on ego-centric, multi-view observations. To this end, we introduce Ego3D-Bench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the spatial reasoning abilities of VLMs using ego-centric, multi-view outdoor data. Ego3D-Bench comprises over 8,600 QA pairs, created with significant involvement from human annotators to ensure quality and diversity. We benchmark 16 SOTA VLMs, including GPT-4o, Gemini1.5-Pro, InternVL3, and Qwen2.5-VL. Our results reveal a notable performance gap between human level scores and VLM performance, highlighting that current VLMs still fall short of human level spatial understanding. To bridge this gap, we propose Ego3D-VLM, a post-training framework that enhances 3D spatial reasoning of VLMs. Ego3D-VLM generates cognitive map based on estimated global 3D coordinates, resulting in 12% average improvement on multi-choice QA and 56% average improvement on absolute distance estimation. Ego3D-VLM is modular and can be integrated with any existing VLM. Together, Ego3D-Bench and Ego3D-VLM offer valuable tools for advancing toward human level spatial understanding in real-world, multi-view environments.

Abstract of Spatial Reasoning with Vision-Language Models in Ego-Centric Multi-View Scenes (arXiv:2509.06266, CC0)
13
Entries on its own leaderboard, 11 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 7.20

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Ovis2-16B, at 7.40.

Qwen3.7-Plus leads with 5.90, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 7.20
  2. 2 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 7.40
  3. 3 Ovis2-16B 7.40
  4. 4 InternVL3-78B 7.40
  5. 5 Qwen2.5-72B 7.50
  6. 6 InternVL3-14B 7.70
  7. 7 Ovis2-8B 7.80
  8. 8 InternVL3-8B 8.00
  9. 9 Ovis2-4B 8.50
  10. 10 InternVL3-38B 8.50
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-7B 9.50
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-3B 12.6
  13. 13 Qwen2.5-32B 13.7

Source: Official Ego3D-Bench leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official Ego3D-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 7.20 Ego3D-VLM Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 7.40 Ego3D-VLM Official leaderboard
3 Ovis2-16B 7.40 Ego3D-VLM Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 InternVL3-78B 7.40 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen2.5-72B 7.50 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL3-14B 7.70 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Ovis2-8B 7.80 Ego3D-VLM Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL3-8B 8.00 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Ovis2-4B 8.50 Ego3D-VLM Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
10 InternVL3-38B 8.50 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-7B 9.50 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-3B 12.6 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2.5-32B 13.7 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.7-Plus 5.90 Jun 2026 Lab model card
2 Ovis2-16B 7.40 Ego3D-VLM Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 InternVL3-78B 7.40 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-72B 7.50 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL3-14B 7.70 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Ovis2-8B 7.80 Ego3D-VLM Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
7 InternVL3-8B 8.00 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Ovis2-4B 8.50 Ego3D-VLM Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 InternVL3-38B 8.50 Ego3D-VLM Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-7B 9.50 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-3B 12.6 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-32B 13.7 Ego3D-VLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in September 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Alibaba International Digital Commerce (AIDC-AI)
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2025
Ovis2-16B 7.40

Source: Official Ego3D-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
0.00 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 2025 2026 0.00 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 2025 2026

Sources: Official Ego3D-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 5.9 Ego3D-Bench (lower is better)

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%