EnigmaEval
1,184 multimodal puzzle-hunt puzzles (v2 dataset has 1,161). Model gives one exact answer per puzzle. Normal and Hard splits.
CAIS posted an updated v2 release on Hugging Face on July 23rd, 2026 with cleaned puzzles from the original set. The card points to dashboard.safe.ai for results. Check whether v2 scores compare with v1.
- Made by
- Scale AI + Center for AI Safety + MIT
- Released
- February 2025
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Competition
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
- Last model added
- July 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
As language models master existing reasoning benchmarks, we need new challenges to evaluate their cognitive frontiers. Puzzle-solving events are rich repositories of challenging multimodal problems that test a wide range of advanced reasoning and knowledge capabilities, making them a unique testbed for evaluating frontier language models. We introduce EnigmaEval, a dataset of problems and solutions derived from puzzle competitions and events that probes models' ability to perform implicit knowledge synthesis and multi-step deductive reasoning. Unlike existing reasoning and knowledge benchmarks, puzzle solving challenges models to discover hidden connections between seemingly unrelated pieces of information to uncover solution paths. The benchmark comprises 1184 puzzles of varying complexity – each typically requiring teams of skilled solvers hours to days to complete – with unambiguous, verifiable solutions that enable efficient evaluation. State-of-the-art language models achieve extremely low accuracy on these puzzles, even lower than other difficult benchmarks such as Humanity's Last Exam, unveiling models' shortcomings when challenged with problems requiring unstructured and lateral reasoning.
Claude Fable 5 leads with 39.3% among models released by July 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 14 more
- 1 Claude Fable 5 high 39.3%
- 2 GPT-5.6 Sol high 37.1%
- 3
Gemini 3.1 Pro high 36.8%
- 4
Gemini 3.5 Flash high 25.4%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.8 xhigh 23.5%
Source: Official EnigmaEval leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5 | 39.3% | high | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 37.1% | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 36.8% | high | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 25.4% | high | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 23.5% | xhigh | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official EnigmaEval leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official EnigmaEval leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%