Benchmark Almanac

EnigmaEval

Claude Fable 5 39.3% leads since June 2026
Not in model cards

1,184 multimodal puzzle-hunt puzzles (v2 dataset has 1,161). Model gives one exact answer per puzzle. Normal and Hard splits.

CAIS posted an updated v2 release on Hugging Face on July 23rd, 2026 with cleaned puzzles from the original set. The card points to dashboard.safe.ai for results. Check whether v2 scores compare with v1.

Released
February 2025
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Competition
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
Last model added
July 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

As language models master existing reasoning benchmarks, we need new challenges to evaluate their cognitive frontiers. Puzzle-solving events are rich repositories of challenging multimodal problems that test a wide range of advanced reasoning and knowledge capabilities, making them a unique testbed for evaluating frontier language models. We introduce EnigmaEval, a dataset of problems and solutions derived from puzzle competitions and events that probes models' ability to perform implicit knowledge synthesis and multi-step deductive reasoning. Unlike existing reasoning and knowledge benchmarks, puzzle solving challenges models to discover hidden connections between seemingly unrelated pieces of information to uncover solution paths. The benchmark comprises 1184 puzzles of varying complexity – each typically requiring teams of skilled solvers hours to days to complete – with unambiguous, verifiable solutions that enable efficient evaluation. State-of-the-art language models achieve extremely low accuracy on these puzzles, even lower than other difficult benchmarks such as Humanity's Last Exam, unveiling models' shortcomings when challenged with problems requiring unstructured and lateral reasoning.

Abstract of EnigmaEval: A Benchmark of Long Multimodal Reasoning Challenges (arXiv:2502.08859, CC0)
5
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Claude Fable 5 leads with 39.3% among models released by July 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5 high 39.3%
  2. 2 GPT-5.6 Sol high 37.1%
  3. 3 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 36.8%
  4. 4 Gemini 3.5 Flash high 25.4%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.8 xhigh 23.5%

Source: Official EnigmaEval leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5 39.3% high Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.6 Sol 37.1% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 36.8% high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3.5 Flash 25.4% high May 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.8 23.5% xhigh May 2026 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2026

Source: Official EnigmaEval leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Fable 5

Source: Official EnigmaEval leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%