Benchmark Almanac

GSM1k

Claude 3.5 Sonnet 96.6% leads since June 2024
Not in model cards

Models solve new grade school math word problems written to mirror GSM8K in style and difficulty. The gap between GSM8K and GSM1k accuracy shows overfitting or contamination.

Scale's SEAL Math board used 1,000 problems with 50 public, and Scale marked it deprecated in 2025-01. The Hugging Face dataset posted on March 31st, 2025 has 1,205 rows. Some model families dropped up to 8 points against GSM8K.

Made by
Scale AI
Released
May 2024
Kind
Word problems
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.5 Sonnet #157 on the capability index
Last model added
August 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive success on many benchmarks for mathematical reasoning. However, there is growing concern that some of this performance actually reflects dataset contamination, where data closely resembling benchmark questions leaks into the training data, instead of true reasoning ability. To investigate this claim rigorously, we commission Grade School Math 1000 (GSM1k). GSM1k is designed to mirror the style and complexity of the established GSM8k benchmark, the gold standard for measuring elementary mathematical reasoning. We ensure that the two benchmarks are comparable across important metrics such as human solve rates, number of steps in solution, answer magnitude, and more. When evaluating leading open- and closed-source LLMs on GSM1k, we observe accuracy drops of up to 8%, with several families of models showing evidence of systematic overfitting across almost all model sizes. Further analysis suggests a positive relationship (Spearman's r^2 = 0.36) between a model's probability of generating an example from GSM8k and its performance gap between GSM8k and GSM1k, suggesting that some models may have partially memorized GSM8k. Nevertheless, many models, especially those on the frontier, show minimal signs of overfitting, and all models broadly demonstrate generalization to novel math problems guaranteed to not be in their training data.

Abstract of A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic (arXiv:2405.00332, CC0)
16
Entries on its own leaderboard, 15 models we track

Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 96.6% among models released by August 2024

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 96.6%
  2. 2 GPT-4o Aug 2024 95.7%
  3. 3 Llama 3.1-405B 95.6%
  4. 4 Claude 3 Opus 95.2%
  5. 5 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 95.1%
  6. 6 GPT-4o May 2024 94.8%
  7. 7 Gemini 1.5 Pro (August 2024) 94.7%
  8. 8 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 93.9%
  9. 9 Claude 3 Sonnet 93.3%
  10. 10 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 92.3%
  11. 11 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 90.5%
  12. 12 Llama 3-70B 90.1%
  13. 13 Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 90.1%
  14. 14 Mistral Large 87.5%
  15. 15 Gemini 1.0 Pro 79.8%
  16. 16 Code Llama 34B Instruct 37.5%

Source: Official GSM1k leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 96.6% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o Aug 2024 95.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Llama 3.1-405B 95.6% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Claude 3 Opus 95.2% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 95.1% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4o May 2024 94.8% May 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 1.5 Pro (August 2024) 94.7% Official leaderboard
8 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 93.9% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Claude 3 Sonnet 93.3% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 92.3% May 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 90.5% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Llama 3-70B 90.1% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 90.1% May 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Mistral Large 87.5% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Gemini 1.0 Pro 79.8% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
16 Code Llama 34B Instruct 37.5% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in May 2024, by Claude 3 Opus

Source: Official GSM1k leaderboard

Gemini 1.5 Pro on the official leaderboard passed 85% in February 2024

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude 3 Opus Gemini 1.5 Pro Gemini 1.0 Pro Code Llama 34B Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.5 Sonnet Gemini 1.0 Pro

Source: Official GSM1k leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Math

All 113 in Math
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • MathArena Apex Shortlist In use Models solve 47 hard final-answer problems that MathArena selected from 2025 competitions, where the best models scored about 50% at selection. Scored by accuracy over repeated attempts. GPT-5.5 98.4%