- Best of MMLU / French MMLU / German MMLU / Spanish MMLU / Italian MMLU 81.2
- Best of HellaS (10-shot) / French HellaS / German HellaS / Spanish HellaS / Italian HellaS 89.2
- WinoG (5-shot) 86.7
- Best of Arc C (25) [Arc C (5) = 94.2] / French Arc-C / German Arc-C / Spanish Arc-C / Italian Arc-C 94
- TriQA (5-shot) 82.7
- TruthfulQA 50.5
- HumanE (pass@1) 45.1
- MBPP (pass@1) 73.1
- Math maj@4 45
- GSM8K maj@8 (8-shot) [maj@1 (5-shot) = 81.0] 91.2
Mistral Large
Mistral Large places in the top three on OR-Bench.
Mistral Large
Closed weights Flagship
- GPQA Diamond 38.8% #188 /229
- BigCodeBench-Hard 8.40% #86 /96
- CulturalBench 43.9% #9 /15
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench v2 | 85.2 | #4 of 85 | Official leaderboard | |
| WinoGrande | 86.7% | #5 of 47 | Lab model card | |
| HellaSwag | 89.2% | #9 of 53 | Lab model card | |
| ARC-Challenge | 94% | #10 of 49 | Lab model card | |
| MixEval | 84.2% | #8 of 34 | Official leaderboard | |
| AlpacaEval 2.0 | 32.6% | #14 of 47 | Official leaderboard | |
| TriviaQA | 82.7% | #15 of 40 | Lab model card | |
| WildBench | 42.3 | #23 of 47 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMLU | 81.2% | #70 of 131 | Lab model card | |
| CulturalBench | 43.9% | #9 of 15 | Official leaderboard | |
| LLM-AggreFact | 74.2% | #6 of 10 | Official leaderboard | |
| TruthfulQA | 50.5% | #20 of 30 | Lab model card | |
| LMArena (Elo) | 1,243 | #264 of 335 | Official leaderboard | |
| SEAL Precise Instruction Following | 79.9 | #16 of 18 | Official leaderboard |
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 91.2% | #38 of 92 | Lab model card | |
| MATH Level 5 | 24.5% | #71 of 94 | Epoch AI run | |
| MATH | 45% | #77 of 99 | Lab model card | |
| GPQA Diamond | 38.8% | #188 of 229 | Epoch AI run | |
| GSM1k | 87.5% | #13 of 15 | Official leaderboard | |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.94% | #197 of 212 | Epoch AI run | |
| ForecastBench | 0.17 | #78 of 82 | Official leaderboard |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 62.2% | #25 of 46 | Official leaderboard | |
| MBPP | 73.1% | #39 of 71 | Lab model card | |
| MBPP+ | 59.5% | #22 of 35 | Official leaderboard | |
| BigCodeBench | 34.1% | #58 of 69 | Official leaderboard | |
| HumanEval | 45.1% | #87 of 101 | Lab model card | |
| BigCodeBench-Hard | 8.40% | #86 of 96 | Official leaderboard | |
| SEAL Coding | 811 | #24 of 26 | Official leaderboard | |
| DesignArena Agentic Overall | 908 | #72 of 74 | Official leaderboard |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA | 17.1% | #5 of 15 | Official leaderboard |
Safety and security
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR-Bench | 9.80% | #3 of 28 | Official leaderboard | |
| SEAL Adversarial Robustness | 37.0 | #7 of 8 | Official leaderboard | |
| DistressBench | 59.1% | #39 of 42 | Official leaderboard |
Its lab's numbers put it at 115.8, 4.0 points below its ECI
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 10 capability results Mistral AI reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 111.1 to 120.5. How we compute it.
- ARC-Challenge 94
- GSM8K 91.2
- HellaSwag 89.2
- WinoGrande 86.7
- TriviaQA 82.7
- MMLU 81.2
- MBPP 73.1
- TruthfulQA 50.5
- HumanEval 45.1
- MATH 45
Its lab's numbers next to 2 leaderboards
Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.
Mistral AI's models over time
Mistral AI's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.
Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.