Human SxS image generation Elo (Google)
Google compares generated images side by side and converts human preferences into Elo ratings.
The Gemini 3.1 Flash Image and Nano Banana 2.1 model cards report internal human side-by-side image generation ratings.
- Made by
- Google DeepMind
- Released
- February 2026
- Kind
- Image generation and editing
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Ranked by votes
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
2 models have ratings here, all from their labs’ own posts
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs. A rating ranks a model only against others rated in the same arena at the same time, so these don’t show who leads.
Bars start at 1,040.
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 1,114 | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 1,050 | Oct 2026 | Lab model card |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | 1050 | Overall Preference, Thinking |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | | 1050 | Overall Preference, Thinking | Capabilities |
| Feb 26, 2026 | | 1114 | Infographics (Factuality), Thinking + Text Search + Image Search | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%