Benchmark Almanac

HumanEval Infilling

Only in system cards

Models fill in a masked middle span of HumanEval solutions given the code before and after it. Unit tests check the completed function.

The harness offers single-line, multi-line, random-span and random-span-light settings. Labs often report single-line and random-span-light separately.

Released
July 2022
Kind
Function-level problems
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
June 2025
Last model added
June 2025
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Mercury Coder Small leads with 84.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Mercury Coder Small 84.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Mercury Coder Small 84.8% Jun 2025 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Mercury Coder Small 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Mercury Coder Small

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 17, 2025 Mercury Coder Small technical report 84.8 FIM Average of Single-Line 93.1 and Random-Span-Light 76.5 (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471