Benchmark Almanac

KMMMU

Fading

Models answer 3,466 college and exam level questions that combine images with Korean text. Questions come from Korean exam sources, some with several images.

A Korean counterpart of MMMU. The dataset repo was created in 2026-02 and the technical report followed in 2026-04.

Made by
HAE-RAE
Released
April 2026
Kind
General visual questions
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
April 2026

In the authors’ words

Multimodal evaluation is strengthened when benchmarks reflect the languages, institutions, and disciplinary conventions that shape expert visual reasoning. We introduce KMMMU, a native Korean benchmark built from Korean-native examination materials. KMMMU contains 3,466 questions spanning nine disciplines and nine visual modality categories. For targeted evaluation on challenging questions and Korean-specific knowledge, we additionally provide KMMMU-Adv and KMMMU-Local, respectively. Experiments show that the strongest evaluated open-weight model reaches 42.05% on the KMMMU, while the best evaluated proprietary model achieves 52.42% on the KMMMU-Adv. Performance varies substantially across disciplines and answer formats, with Korean-specific questions showing gaps of up to 13.43%. Error analysis suggests that inspected failures often involve convention-to-label mapping, few-shot symbolic induction, localized knowledge recall, and domain-specific standards, not reasoning depth alone. KMMMU provides a testbed for native Korean expert-level multimodal understanding beyond English-centric or translation-based evaluation.

Abstract of KMMMU: Evaluation of Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding in Korean Language and Context (arXiv:2604.13058, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

EXAONE 4.5 33B leads with 42.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 EXAONE 4.5 33B 42.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 EXAONE 4.5 33B 42.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) EXAONE 4.5 33B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) EXAONE 4.5 33B

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

LG AI Research
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 42.7 KMMMU

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 42.7 KMMMU (Table 2, Reasoning mode) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%