KorMedMCQA
Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
A multimodal follow-up, KorMedMCQA-V, appeared in 2026-02.
- Made by
- KAIST and collaborators (Sunjun Kweon et al.)
- Released
- March 2024
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
In the authors’ words
We present KorMedMCQA, the first Korean Medical Multiple-Choice Question Answering benchmark, derived from professional healthcare licensing examinations conducted in Korea between 2012 and 2024. The dataset contains 7,469 questions from examinations for doctor, nurse, pharmacist, and dentist, covering a wide range of medical disciplines. We evaluate the performance of 59 large language models, spanning proprietary and open-source models, multilingual and Korean-specialized models, and those fine-tuned for clinical applications. Our results show that applying Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning can enhance the model performance by up to 4.5% compared to direct answering approaches. We also investigate whether MedQA, one of the most widely used medical benchmarks derived from the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination, can serve as a reliable proxy for evaluating model performance in other regions-in this case, Korea. Our correlation analysis between model scores on KorMedMCQA and MedQA reveals that these two benchmarks align no better than benchmarks from entirely different domains (e.g., MedQA and MMLU-Pro). This finding underscores the substantial linguistic and clinical differences between Korean and U.S. medical contexts, reinforcing the need for region-specific medical QA benchmarks. To support ongoing research in Korean healthcare AI, we publicly release the KorMedMCQA via Huggingface.
Solar Pro 4 leads with 93.2% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- 2
Solar Open 2 93%
- 3
Solar Pro 2 87.4%
- 4
Solar Open 100B 84.4%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 93.2% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 93% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 87.4% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 84.4% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card |
3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Upstage’s own number for Solar Pro 2 passed 85% in July 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | 93.2 | KorMedMCQA (medicine)* (in-house) | |
| Jul 22, 2026 | 93 | KorMedMCQA | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 84.4 | KorMedMCQA | |
| Jul 10, 2025 | 87.4 | KorMedMCQA (medical) |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | | 93 | KorMedMCQA (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jan 11, 2026 | | 84.4 | KorMedMCQA (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- Legal Research Bench In use Agents answer US federal and state legal research questions with case-law and web tools. Expert rubrics, all-pass and weighted scores by LLM judge.
Gemini 4 Carbon 55.8%