HealthBench Professional
525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics.
Enriched about 3.5x for examples that are hard for OpenAI models. About one third adversarial.
- Made by
- OpenAI
- Released
- April 2026
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Millions of clinicians use ChatGPT to support clinical care, but evaluations of the most common use cases in model-clinician conversations are limited. We introduce HealthBench Professional, an open benchmark for evaluating large language models on real tasks that clinicians bring to ChatGPT in the course of their work. The benchmark is organized around three common use cases central to clinical practice: care consult, writing and documentation, and medical research. Each example includes a physician-authored conversation with ChatGPT for Clinicians and is scored via rubrics written and iteratively adjudicated by three or more physicians across three phases. HealthBench Professional examples were carefully selected for quality, representativeness, and difficulty for OpenAI's current frontier models, to enable continued measurement of progress. Difficult examples for recent OpenAI models were enriched by roughly 3.5 times relative to the candidate pool of 15,079 examples. Additionally, about one-third of examples involve physicians conducting deliberate adversarial testing of models. As a strong baseline, we also collected human physician responses for all tasks (unbounded time, specialist-matched, web access). The best scoring system, GPT-5.4 in ChatGPT for Clinicians, outperforms base GPT-5.4, all other models, and human physicians. We hope HealthBench Professional provides the healthcare AI community a measure to track frontier model progress in real-world clinical tasks and build systems that clinicians can trust to improve care.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads with 69.2%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-5.4 leads with 59% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads with 69.2%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 69.2 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 68.8
Gemini 4 Argon
- 67.7 Claude Fable 5.2
- 66.0 Claude Fable 5
- 65.6 Claude Opus 5.5
- 65.3
Ling-3.1-flash
- 64.8 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 64.7 GPT-6 Astra
- 64.2 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 62.7 GPT-6.1 Terra
- 62.3
Muse Wonder Full
- 62.1 Claude Fable 5.1
- 60.8 GPT-6 Luna
- 60.8 GPT-6 Sol
- 60.5 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 60.5
Muse Wonder
- 59.8 Claude Opus 5
- 59.3
Muse Spark 1.1
- 57.8 Claude Sonnet 5
- 57.7 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 56.7 Grok 4.7
- 55.8 Claude Opus 4.8
- 55.7 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 51.8 GPT-5.5
- 38.4 GPT-5.5 Instant
- 35.0
MAI-Thinking-1
- 1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- 2
Gemini 4 Argon 68.8%
- 3 Claude Fable 5.2 67.7%
- 4 Claude Fable 5 66%
- 5 Claude Opus 5.5 65.6%
- 6
Ling-3.1-flash 65.3%
- 7 Claude Haiku 5.5 64.8%
- 8 GPT-6 Astra 64.7%
- 9 GPT-6.1 Sol 64.2%
- 10 GPT-6.1 Terra 62.7%
- 11
Muse Wonder Full 62.3%
- 12 Claude Fable 5.1 62.1%
- 13 GPT-6 Luna 60.8%
- 14 GPT-6 Sol 60.8%
- 15 GPT-5.6 Sol 60.5%
- 16
Muse Wonder 60.5%
- 17 Claude Opus 5 59.8%
- 18
Muse Spark 1.1 59.3%
- 19 Claude Sonnet 5 57.8%
- 20 GPT-5.6 Terra 57.7%
- 21 Grok 4.7 56.7%
- 22 Claude Opus 4.8 55.8%
- 23 GPT-5.6 Luna 55.7%
- 24 GPT-5.5 51.8%
- 25 GPT-5.5 Instant 38.4%
- 26
MAI-Thinking-1 35%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GPT-5.4 59%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.7 47%
- 3 GPT-5 46.2%
- 4 GPT-5.2 45.9%
- 5
Gemini 3.1 Pro 43.8%
- 6 Grok 4.20 36.1%
Source: Official HealthBench Professional leaderboard
- 69.2 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 68.8
Gemini 4 Argon
- 67.7 Claude Fable 5.2
- 66.0 Claude Fable 5
- 65.6 Claude Opus 5.5
- 65.3
Ling-3.1-flash
- 64.8 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 64.7 GPT-6 Astra
- 64.2 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 62.7 GPT-6.1 Terra
- 62.3
Muse Wonder Full
- 62.1 Claude Fable 5.1
- 60.8 GPT-6 Luna
- 60.8 GPT-6 Sol
- 60.5 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 60.5
Muse Wonder
- 59.8 Claude Opus 5
- 59.3
Muse Spark 1.1
- 59.0 GPT-5.4
- 57.8 Claude Sonnet 5
- 57.7 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 56.7 Grok 4.7
- 55.8 Claude Opus 4.8
- 55.7 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 51.8 GPT-5.5
- 47.0 Claude Opus 4.7
- 46.2 GPT-5
- 45.9 GPT-5.2
- 43.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 38.4 GPT-5.5 Instant
- 36.1 Grok 4.20
- 35.0
MAI-Thinking-1
- 1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- 2
Gemini 4 Argon 68.8%
- 3 Claude Fable 5.2 67.7%
- 4 Claude Fable 5 66%
- 5 Claude Opus 5.5 65.6%
- 6
Ling-3.1-flash 65.3%
- 7 Claude Haiku 5.5 64.8%
- 8 GPT-6 Astra 64.7%
- 9 GPT-6.1 Sol 64.2%
- 10 GPT-6.1 Terra 62.7%
- 11
Muse Wonder Full 62.3%
- 12 Claude Fable 5.1 62.1%
- 13 GPT-6 Luna 60.8%
- 14 GPT-6 Sol 60.8%
- 15 GPT-5.6 Sol 60.5%
- 16
Muse Wonder 60.5%
- 17 Claude Opus 5 59.8%
- 18
Muse Spark 1.1 59.3%
- 19 GPT-5.4 59%
- 20 Claude Sonnet 5 57.8%
- 21 GPT-5.6 Terra 57.7%
- 22 Grok 4.7 56.7%
- 23 Claude Opus 4.8 55.8%
- 24 GPT-5.6 Luna 55.7%
- 25 GPT-5.5 51.8%
- 26 Claude Opus 4.7 47%
- 27 GPT-5 46.2%
- 28 GPT-5.2 45.9%
- 29
Gemini 3.1 Pro 43.8%
- 30 GPT-5.5 Instant 38.4%
- 31 Grok 4.20 36.1%
- 32
MAI-Thinking-1 35%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official HealthBench Professional leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 69.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 68.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.2 | 67.7% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5 | 66% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 65.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 65.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 64.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | GPT-6 Astra | 64.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 64.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 62.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 62.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 62.1% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | GPT-6 Luna | 60.8% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | GPT-6 Sol | 60.8% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 60.5% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 60.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | Claude Opus 5 | 59.8% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 59.3% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 57.8% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 57.7% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | Grok 4.7 | 56.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 55.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 55.7% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | GPT-5.5 | 51.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | GPT-5.5 Instant | 38.4% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 35% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.4 | 59% | ChatGPT for Clinicians | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 47% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5 | 46.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5.2 | 45.9% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 43.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Grok 4.20 | 36.1% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 69.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 68.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.2 | 67.7% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5 | 66% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 65.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 65.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 64.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | GPT-6 Astra | 64.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 64.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 62.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 62.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 62.1% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | GPT-6 Luna | 60.8% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | GPT-6 Sol | 60.8% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 60.5% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 60.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | Claude Opus 5 | 59.8% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 59.3% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | GPT-5.4 | 59% | ChatGPT for Clinicians | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 57.8% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 57.7% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | Grok 4.7 | 56.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 55.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 55.7% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | GPT-5.5 | 51.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 47% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | GPT-5 | 46.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | GPT-5.2 | 45.9% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 43.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | GPT-5.5 Instant | 38.4% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | Grok 4.20 | 36.1% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 35% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 6 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in April 2026 Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official HealthBench Professional leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official HealthBench Professional leaderboard and labs’ model cards
6 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | 65.3 | Healthbench Professional (AQ environment) | |
| Oct 12, 2026 | 60.5 | HealthBench Pro | |
| Oct 12, 2026 | 62.3 | HealthBench Pro | |
| Oct 7, 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 64.8 | HealthBench Professional (Length-adjusted) |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 69.2 | HealthBench Professional |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 65.6 | HealthBench Professional |
| Sep 21, 2026 | Grok 4.7 | 56.7 | HealthBench Professional (Clinical reasoning) |
| Sep 3, 2026 | GPT-6 Astra | 63.4 | HealthBench Professional (length-adjusted) |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 62.1 | HealthBench Professional |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Claude Opus 5 | 59.8 | Health HealthBench Professional |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 55.7 | HealthBench Professional |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 57.7 | HealthBench Professional |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 60.5 | HealthBench Professional |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 57.8 | HealthBench Professional |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5 | 66 | Health HealthBench Professional |
| Jun 2, 2026 | 35 | HealthBench Prof. |
32 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.2 system card | 67.7 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted score at max effort, following Fable 5.1 metric choice. Raw score 71.1%. Artificial Analysis run with GPT-5.4 low-effort grader and fallbacks. Not comparable with prior Anthropic-graded runs (Section 8.16.2) | Health |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 47.4 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (Table 5) | Health |
| Oct 26, 2026 | GPT-6.1 Terra system card addendum | 62.7 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (unadjusted 64.2) (HealthBench table, 5.1) | Health |
| Oct 13, 2026 | | 68.8 | HealthBench Pro, without Search grounding 68.8 (length-adjusted 56.5); with Search grounding 76.7 (length-adjusted 61.4) (Table 5.1) | Health |
| Oct 12, 2026 | | 60.5 | HealthBench Pro, length-normalized weighted rubric score, no tools, Muse Wonder (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) | Health |
| Oct 12, 2026 | | 62.3 | HealthBench Pro, length-normalized weighted rubric score, no tools, Muse Wonder Full (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) | Health |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card addendum | 55.2 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (Table 5) | Health |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 48.2 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (Table 5) | Health |
| Oct 7, 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 64.8 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted, max effort (raw 71.0) (Table 8.1.A) | Health |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum | 64.2 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (Table 7) | Health |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 69.2 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted at max effort (77.1% before length adjustment) (Table 8.1.A, 8.15.2) | Health |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card | 60.8 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (Table 29, A.4.1) | Health |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card | 60.8 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (Table 29, A.4.1) | Health |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 65.6 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted at max effort (77.1% before length adjustment) (Table 8.1.A, 8.15.2) | Health |
| Sep 21, 2026 | Grok 4.7 model card | 56.7 | HealthBench Professional, xhigh, graded by Grok 4.6 (high), filtered tasks scored zero (5.1) | Health |
| Sep 3, 2026 | GPT-6 Astra system card | 64.7 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted, revised 2026-09-22 (Table 6) | Health |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 62.1 | HealthBench Professional length-adjusted score (Table 8.1.A); raw score 74.2% (8.17.2) | Health |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum | 54 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum | 44.1 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 59.8 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted at max effort (73.4% raw) (Table 8.1.A, 8.15.2) | Health |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | 57.7 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | 60.5 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | 55.7 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Jul 9, 2026 | | 59.3 | HealthBench Professional (Figure 44) | Health |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 57.8 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted, max effort, five trials (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.2) | Health |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | 57.7 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | 60.5 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | 55.7 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| Jun 2, 2026 | | 35 | HealthBench Prof., length-penalized, GPT-5.4 grader (Table 12, rounded) | Health |
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 55.8 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted score, max effort, Claude Sonnet 4.6 grader, five trials (8.14.1, Figure 8.14.A) | Health |
| May 4, 2026 | GPT-5.5 Instant system card | 38.4 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted, unadjusted 40.7 (Table 5) | Health |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 system card | 51.8 | HealthBench Professional, length-adjusted (Table 7) | Health |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- Legal Research Bench In use Agents answer US federal and state legal research questions with case-law and web tools. Expert rubrics, all-pass and weighted scores by LLM judge.
Gemini 4 Carbon 55.8%