KRIS-Bench
Image editing models follow 1,267 instructions that need factual, conceptual or procedural knowledge across 22 tasks. A GPT-4o judge scores the edits.
The judge rates visual consistency, visual quality, instruction following and knowledge plausibility. NeurIPS 2025 accepted the paper.
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Image generation and editing
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a system card
- May 2025
- Last model added
- April 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Recent advances in multi-modal generative models have enabled significant progress in instruction-based image editing. However, while these models produce visually plausible outputs, their capacity for knowledge-based reasoning editing tasks remains under-explored. In this paper, we introduce KRIS-Bench (Knowledge-based Reasoning in Image-editing Systems Benchmark), a diagnostic benchmark designed to assess models through a cognitively informed lens. Drawing from educational theory, KRIS-Bench categorizes editing tasks across three foundational knowledge types: Factual, Conceptual, and Procedural. Based on this taxonomy, we design 22 representative tasks spanning 7 reasoning dimensions and release 1,267 high-quality annotated editing instances. To support fine-grained evaluation, we propose a comprehensive protocol that incorporates a novel Knowledge Plausibility metric, enhanced by knowledge hints and calibrated through human studies. Empirical results on 10 state-of-the-art models reveal significant gaps in reasoning performance, highlighting the need for knowledge-centric benchmarks to advance the development of intelligent image editing systems.
GPT-4o image editing [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 80.1
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Step Image Edit 2, at 66.2.
Step Image Edit 2 leads with 66.2, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 80.1 GPT-4o image editing [snapshot unspecified]
- 66.2
Step Image Edit 2
- 63.4 JoyAI-Image-Edit
- 62.4 Gemini 2.0
- 62.0
Qwen-Image-Edit (2511)
- 61.4 Step 3o vision
- 60.9
Step1X-Edit v1.2
- 60.7 Doubao
- 60.4 BAGEL-Think
- 56.4
BAGEL
- 55.1 FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
- 54.2 FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
- 51.6
Step1X-Edit v1.1
- 50.3 UniWorld-V1
- 49.7 OmniGen2
- 49.5 FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]
- 44.9 ByteMorph
- 44.7 HiDream-E1
- 43.3
Step1X-Edit
- 39.7 Emu2
- 38.5 AnyEdit
- 37.1 MagicBrush
- 28.9 OmniGen
- 22.8 InstructPix2Pix
- 1 GPT-4o image editing [snapshot unspecified] 80.1
- 2
Step Image Edit 2 66.2
- 3 JoyAI-Image-Edit 63.4
- 4 Gemini 2.0 62.4
- 5
Qwen-Image-Edit (2511) 62.0
- 6 Step 3o vision 61.4
- 7
Step1X-Edit v1.2 60.9
- 8 Doubao 60.7
- 9 BAGEL-Think 60.4
- 10
BAGEL 56.4
- 11 FLUX.1 Kontext [max] 55.1
- 12 FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] 54.2
- 13
Step1X-Edit v1.1 51.6
- 14 UniWorld-V1 50.3
- 15 OmniGen2 49.7
- 16 FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] 49.5
- 17 ByteMorph 44.9
- 18 HiDream-E1 44.7
- 19
Step1X-Edit 43.3
- 20 Emu2 39.7
- 21 AnyEdit 38.5
- 22 MagicBrush 37.1
- 23 OmniGen 28.9
- 24 InstructPix2Pix 22.8
Source: Official KRIS-Bench leaderboard
- 1
Step Image Edit 2 66.2
- 2
Qwen-Image-Edit (2511) 62.0
- 3
Step1X-Edit v1.2 60.9
- 4
BAGEL-7B-MoT 60.2
- 5
BAGEL 56.4
- 6 FLUX.1 Kontext [max] 55.1
- 7 FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] 54.2
- 8
Step1X-Edit v1.1 51.6
- 9 FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] 49.5
- 10
Step1X-Edit 43.3
Sources: Official KRIS-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o image editing [snapshot unspecified] | 80.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | | 66.2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | JoyAI-Image-Edit | 63.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Gemini 2.0 | 62.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 62.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | Step 3o vision | 61.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 60.9 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Doubao | 60.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | BAGEL-Think | 60.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 56.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | FLUX.1 Kontext [max] | 55.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] | 54.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 51.6 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | UniWorld-V1 | 50.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | OmniGen2 | 49.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] | 49.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | ByteMorph | 44.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | HiDream-E1 | 44.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | | 43.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | Emu2 | 39.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | AnyEdit | 38.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | MagicBrush | 37.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | OmniGen | 28.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | InstructPix2Pix | 22.8 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 66.2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 62.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | | 60.9 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 60.2 | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 56.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | FLUX.1 Kontext [max] | 55.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] | 54.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | | 51.6 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] | 49.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 43.3 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2025 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official KRIS-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official KRIS-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2025 | | 60.2 | KRIS-Bench Overall, BAGEL w/ Self-CoT, evaluated by GPT-4o (Table 10). Without CoT 56.21 | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%