LEGO-Puzzles
Vision-language models answer LEGO assembly questions, from basic spatial understanding to planning several assembly steps. The elementary set has 1,100 questions over 11 tasks.
A second task set asks models to plan step by step. VLMEvalKit supports it.
- Made by
- Shanghai AI Laboratory and collaborators (Tang, Duan et al.)
- Released
- March 2025
- Kind
- Spatial reasoning and counting
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Many real-world applications of spatial intelligence, such as robotic control, autonomous driving, and automated assembly, require spatial reasoning across multiple sequential steps. However, the extent to which current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) possess this capability remains largely unexplored. Inspired by LEGO construction, a recreational activity that critically relies on multi-step spatial reasoning, we introduce LEGO-Puzzles: a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of MLLMs from basic spatial understanding to multi-step planning. LEGO-Puzzles contains two task sets. The Elementary set covers 11 visual question-answering (VQA) tasks with 1,100 carefully curated samples to test elementary spatial reasoning skills that are cruical for LEGO assembly. The Planning set directly requires the model to generate a step-by-step plan for assembling a target LEGO structure, where the tasks are organized into subsets with different planning horizons ranging up to 8. Our evaluation of 29 state-of-the-art MLLMs shows that even the strongest models struggle with elementary reasoning tasks in LEGO construction, falling at least 20% behind human performance. The planning accuracy also quickly drops to 0% as the number of planning steps increases, whereas our human participants solve all the tasks perfectly. Switching the output format from multiple choice to image generation degrades model performance even further, leading to zero accuracy even for planning 3 steps. Overall, LEGO-Puzzles reveals critical limitations in current MLLMs' spatial reasoning capabilities and highlights the need for substantial advances.
GPT-5 leads with 72% among models released by October 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in October 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 72.0 GPT-5
- 69.1 o3
- 68.8 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 57.7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 57.0
Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- 54.0 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 53.6 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 51.6 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 47.7 InternVL3-VL-78B
- 46.6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 46.3 Qwen2-VL-72B
- 46.2
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- 45.7
InternVL2_5-78B
- 44.3 InternVL3.5-VL-38B
- 43.8 Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 39.3 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified)
- 37.5
DeepSeek-VL2-Small
- 37.4 InternVL3.5-VL-8B
- 36.0 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 35.8 InternVL3-VL-8B
- 35.2
InternVL2.5-8B
- 33.6
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 32.2 MiniCPM-V-2_6
- 31.5
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 31.3
Pixtral 12B
- 28.7
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny
- 27.7
VILA1.5-13B
- 26.6
Idefics3-8B-Llama3
- 26.4 EMU3
- 1 GPT-5 72%
- 2 o3 69.1%
- 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 68.8%
- 4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 57.7%
- 5
Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct 57%
- 6 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 54%
- 7 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 53.6%
- 8 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 51.6%
- 9 InternVL3-VL-78B 47.7%
- 10
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 46.6%
- 11 Qwen2-VL-72B 46.3%
- 12
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 46.2%
- 13
InternVL2_5-78B 45.7%
- 14 InternVL3.5-VL-38B 44.3%
- 15 Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 43.8%
- 16 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 39.3%
- 17
DeepSeek-VL2-Small 37.5%
- 18 InternVL3.5-VL-8B 37.4%
- 19 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 36%
- 20 InternVL3-VL-8B 35.8%
- 21
InternVL2.5-8B 35.2%
- 22
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 33.6%
- 23 MiniCPM-V-2_6 32.2%
- 24
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 31.5%
- 25
Pixtral 12B 31.3%
- 26
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny 28.7%
- 27
VILA1.5-13B 27.7%
- 28
Idefics3-8B-Llama3 26.6%
- 29 EMU3 26.4%
Source: Official LEGO-Puzzles leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 72% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | o3 | 69.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 68.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 57.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 57% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 54% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 53.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 51.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | InternVL3-VL-78B | 47.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 46.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Qwen2-VL-72B | 46.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | | 46.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 45.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | InternVL3.5-VL-38B | 44.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 43.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) | 39.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | | 37.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | InternVL3.5-VL-8B | 37.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 36% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | InternVL3-VL-8B | 35.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | | 35.2% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 33.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 32.2% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 31.5% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 31.3% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 28.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 27.7% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 26.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | EMU3 | 26.4% | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in March 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official LEGO-Puzzles leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official LEGO-Puzzles leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%