Benchmark Almanac

LEGO-Puzzles

GPT-5 72% leads since August 2025
Not in model cards

Vision-language models answer LEGO assembly questions, from basic spatial understanding to planning several assembly steps. The elementary set has 1,100 questions over 11 tasks.

A second task set asks models to plan step by step. VLMEvalKit supports it.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Spatial reasoning and counting
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last model added
October 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Many real-world applications of spatial intelligence, such as robotic control, autonomous driving, and automated assembly, require spatial reasoning across multiple sequential steps. However, the extent to which current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) possess this capability remains largely unexplored. Inspired by LEGO construction, a recreational activity that critically relies on multi-step spatial reasoning, we introduce LEGO-Puzzles: a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of MLLMs from basic spatial understanding to multi-step planning. LEGO-Puzzles contains two task sets. The Elementary set covers 11 visual question-answering (VQA) tasks with 1,100 carefully curated samples to test elementary spatial reasoning skills that are cruical for LEGO assembly. The Planning set directly requires the model to generate a step-by-step plan for assembling a target LEGO structure, where the tasks are organized into subsets with different planning horizons ranging up to 8. Our evaluation of 29 state-of-the-art MLLMs shows that even the strongest models struggle with elementary reasoning tasks in LEGO construction, falling at least 20% behind human performance. The planning accuracy also quickly drops to 0% as the number of planning steps increases, whereas our human participants solve all the tasks perfectly. Switching the output format from multiple choice to image generation degrades model performance even further, leading to zero accuracy even for planning 3 steps. Overall, LEGO-Puzzles reveals critical limitations in current MLLMs' spatial reasoning capabilities and highlights the need for substantial advances.

Abstract of LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning? (arXiv:2503.19990, CC0)
29
Entries on its own leaderboard, 16 models we track

GPT-5 leads with 72% among models released by October 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in October 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5 72%
  2. 2 o3 69.1%
  3. 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 68.8%
  4. 4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 57.7%
  5. 5 Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct 57%
  6. 6 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 54%
  7. 7 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 53.6%
  8. 8 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 51.6%
  9. 9 InternVL3-VL-78B 47.7%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 46.6%
  11. 11 Qwen2-VL-72B 46.3%
  12. 12 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 46.2%
  13. 13 InternVL2_5-78B 45.7%
  14. 14 InternVL3.5-VL-38B 44.3%
  15. 15 Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 43.8%
  16. 16 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 39.3%
  17. 17 DeepSeek-VL2-Small 37.5%
  18. 18 InternVL3.5-VL-8B 37.4%
  19. 19 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 36%
  20. 20 InternVL3-VL-8B 35.8%
  21. 21 InternVL2.5-8B 35.2%
  22. 22 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 33.6%
  23. 23 MiniCPM-V-2_6 32.2%
  24. 24 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 31.5%
  25. 25 Pixtral 12B 31.3%
  26. 26 DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny 28.7%
  27. 27 VILA1.5-13B 27.7%
  28. 28 Idefics3-8B-Llama3 26.6%
  29. 29 EMU3 26.4%

Source: Official LEGO-Puzzles leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5 72% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 o3 69.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 68.8% Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 57.7% Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct 57% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 54% Official leaderboard
7 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 53.6% Official leaderboard
8 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 51.6% Official leaderboard
9 InternVL3-VL-78B 47.7% Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 46.6% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2-VL-72B 46.3% Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 46.2% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
13 InternVL2_5-78B 45.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
14 InternVL3.5-VL-38B 44.3% Official leaderboard
15 Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 43.8% Official leaderboard
16 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 39.3% Official leaderboard
17 DeepSeek-VL2-Small 37.5% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
18 InternVL3.5-VL-8B 37.4% Official leaderboard
19 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 36% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
20 InternVL3-VL-8B 35.8% Official leaderboard
21 InternVL2.5-8B 35.2% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
22 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 33.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
23 MiniCPM-V-2_6 32.2% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 31.5% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Pixtral 12B 31.3% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
26 DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny 28.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
27 VILA1.5-13B 27.7% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
28 Idefics3-8B-Llama3 26.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
29 EMU3 26.4% Official leaderboard

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in March 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2025
GPT-5 72%

Source: Official LEGO-Puzzles leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 o3 Qwen2.5-VL-72B Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct VILA1.5-13B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 Qwen2.5-VL-72B

Source: Official LEGO-Puzzles leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%