Benchmark Almanac

LengthCtrl (Tencent)

Models write text that must meet a requested length, in a Tencent in-house test. Task and scoring details are not published.

Seen in the Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct card. Scoring method is a guess from the task type. Qwen reports an in-house test with the same name (lengthctrl-qwen), and we could not tell if they share data.

Made by
Tencent Hunyuan
Released
June 2025
Kind
Creative writing
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Last in a launch post
June 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
June 2025
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct leads with 55.4%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55.4%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55.4% Jun 2025 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct

Source: Labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since June 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jun 27, 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55.4 LengthCtrl

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 26, 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct technical report 55.4 LengthCtrl, slow-thinking (Table 3). Fast-thinking 53.9 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Writing and taste

All 30 in Writing and taste
  • Design Bench (Moonshot) In use Models make graphic designs from direct prompts or few-shot reference images. An automated grader rates the results as Elo scores. Kimi K3.1 Pro 957
  • WritingBench Fading Models complete 1,000 real-world writing requests across 6 domains and 100 subdomains. A judge model scores each reply on five query-specific criteria. GPT-5 83.9
  • Creative Writing (MiniMax in-house) Only in system cards Models write creative pieces for real Hailuo AI user requests. Automatic assessments score the writing. MiniMax-Text-01 81.3%
  • DeepSeek Chinese functional writing evaluation Only in system cards Models answer 3,170 everyday Chinese writing prompts such as reports, emails and speeches. Pairwise judging against a baseline model gives a win rate. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 62.6%
  • Slide generation human evaluation (Z.ai) Only in system cards People compare HTML slide decks from two models on content, layout and visual quality. Metric is overall win rate. GLM-5 67.5%
  • Task-dependent output homogenization evaluation Only in system cards Models answer prompts several times. A judge scores functional diversity where it is wanted and consistency where one answer is right. Muse Spark 0.21