Benchmark Almanac

LiveClawBench

Kimi K2.7 Code 76% leads since June 2026
Kimi K2.7 Code 76% leads since June 2026
In use

Agents act as OpenClaw personal assistants on 134 multi-step tasks across 10 app domains backed by stateful mock services. A run passes when its reward exceeds 0.8.

The paper evaluates 17 agents from eight model families, three runs per case, using the Harbor framework. Tasks include 12 safety cases and are labeled Easy, Medium or Hard.

Released
March 2026
Kind
General assistants
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.5 #20 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

OpenClaw-style personal assistants extend LLM agents from isolated tool use to open-ended, stateful, and personalized software environments. Evaluating these assistants is fundamentally a fidelity problem: benchmarks must be faithful both to the distribution of real assistant tasks and to the execution semantics of the environments in which those tasks unfold. Existing benchmarks often lose fidelity in one dimension or the other. Their task distributions are shaped by what is easy to isolate, mock, and verify, underrepresenting real-world difficulties such as cross-service dependency, contaminated state, implicit intent, and runtime change. Their environments are either live but hard to reproduce, or reproducible but reduced to endpoint-level stubs that remove sessions, artifacts, state transitions, and downstream side effects. We introduce LiveClawBench, a benchmark designed around this dual-fidelity requirement. LiveClawBench combines a Triple-Axis Complexity Framework for difficulty-driven task construction with reproducible full-stack mock applications that preserve stateful execution semantics. With 134 executable cases across 10 domains with 22 mocked services, LiveClawBench supports controlled, extensible, and factor-level diagnostic evaluation of realistic agentic tasks. We release the benchmark resources: (1) Benchmark: https://github.com/Mosi-AI/LiveClawBench; (2) Leaderboard: https://mosi-ai.github.io/LiveClawBench/leaderboard/; (3) Trajectories: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Mosi-AI/LiveClawbench-trajectories

Abstract of LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks (arXiv:2604.13072, CC0)
17
Models scored on its own leaderboard
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

Kimi K2.7 Code leads with 76% among models released by June 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

Kimi K2.7 Code leads with 76%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Kimi K2.7 Code 76%
  2. 2 GLM-5.1 74.7%
  3. 3 GPT-5.5 74.5%
  4. 4 GLM-5.2 72.9%
  5. 5 MiniMax-M3 71.4%
  6. 6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 70.6%
  7. 7 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 70.6%
  8. 8 Qwen 3.6 Flash 70.2%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 4.8 68.8%
  10. 10 Kimi K2.6 68.6%
  11. 11 MiniMax-M2.7 68.4%
  12. 12 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 65.6%
  13. 13 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 60.5%
  14. 14 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 57%
  15. 15 Qwen3.6 27B 54.5%
  16. 16 Qwen3.5-Flash 54%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5-27B 31.6%

Source: Official LiveClawBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi K2.7 Code 76% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GLM-5.1 74.7% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.5 74.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GLM-5.2 72.9% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
5 MiniMax-M3 71.4% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 70.6% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
7 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 70.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen 3.6 Flash 70.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4.8 68.8% May 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Kimi K2.6 68.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
11 MiniMax-M2.7 68.4% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
12 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 65.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
13 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 60.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 57% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3.6 27B 54.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen3.5-Flash 54% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen3.5-27B 31.6% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi K2.7 Code 76% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GLM-5.1 74.7% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.5 74.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GLM-5.2 72.9% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
5 MiniMax-M3 71.4% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 70.6% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
7 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 70.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen 3.6 Flash 70.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4.8 68.8% May 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Kimi K2.6 68.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
11 MiniMax-M2.7 68.4% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
12 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 65.6% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
13 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 60.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 57% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3.6 27B 54.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen3.5-Flash 54% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
17 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 48.1% Oct 2026 Lab model card
18 LFM3-1.7B 45.6% Oct 2026 Lab model card
19 Qwen3.5-27B 31.6% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in March 2026 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen MiniMax Z.ai Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026

Source: Official LiveClawBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K2.7 Code GLM-5.1 MiniMax-M2.7 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K2.7 Code MiniMax-M2.7

Sources: Official LiveClawBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Liquid AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 27, 2026 LFM3-1.7B 45.6 LiveClaw (OpenClaw agent, assumed to be LiveClawBench)
Oct 13, 2026 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 48.1 LiveClaw (assumed to be LiveClawBench)

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%