Benchmark Almanac

LiveMathBench

DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 77.6% tops its leaderboard QwQ-32B-Preview 61.2% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models solve recent competition math problems, sampled many times. The G-Pass@k metric rewards both peak accuracy and stable answers across samples.

Releases are dated, such as v202412 and v202505, so scores from different releases are not comparable. Not Google DeepMind's LiveMath. The paper has 92 HF upvotes.

Released
December 2024
Kind
Competition problems with answers
Level
Competition
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen2.5-Max #155 on the capability index
Last model added
January 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has shown remarkable progress in complex reasoning tasks. However, a significant disparity exists between benchmark performances and real-world applications. We attribute this gap primarily to current evaluation protocols and metrics, which inadequately capture the full spectrum of LLM capabilities, especially in complex reasoning tasks where both accuracy and consistency are essential. In this paper, we introduce G-Pass@k, a novel evaluation metric that continuously assesses model performance across multiple sampling attempts, quantifying both the model's performance potential and its stability. Through extensive experiments on various public and newly constructed benchmarks, we employ G-Pass@k in conjunction with state-of-the-art large language models to provide comprehensive insights into their potential capabilities and operational consistency. Our findings reveal a significant opportunity to enhance the realistic reasoning abilities of LLMs, underscoring the necessity for more robust evaluation metrics.

Abstract of Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning? (arXiv:2412.13147, CC0)
18
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track

DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 77.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is QwQ-32B-Preview, at 61.2%.

The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 77.6%
  2. 2 OpenAI-o3-mini LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 76.8%
  3. 3 DeepSeek-Distill-Llama-70B LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 69.7%
  4. 4 DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-32B LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 69.7%
  5. 5 OpenAI-o1-mini LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 64.8%
  6. 6 DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-7B LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 63.1%
  7. 7 QwQ-32B-Preview LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 61.2%
  8. 8 DeepSeek-Distill-Llama-8B LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 52.2%
  9. 9 Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 42.3%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-Max LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 42.2%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 37.8%
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 36.6%
  13. 13 Mistral-Large-Instruct-2411 LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 36.4%
  14. 14 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 35.3%
  15. 15 InternLM3-8B-Instruct LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 33.6%
  16. 16 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 27.5%
  17. 17 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 25.8%
  18. 18 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 10.4%

Source: Official LiveMathBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 77.6% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
2 OpenAI-o3-mini 76.8% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
3 DeepSeek-Distill-Llama-70B 69.7% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-32B 69.7% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
5 OpenAI-o1-mini 64.8% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-7B 63.1% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
7 QwQ-32B-Preview 61.2% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek-Distill-Llama-8B 52.2% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct 42.3% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-Max 42.2% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct 37.8% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct 36.6% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
13 Mistral-Large-Instruct-2411 36.4% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
14 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 35.3% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
15 InternLM3-8B-Instruct 33.6% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 27.5% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct 25.8% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard
18 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 10.4% LiveMathBench-202412; mG-Pass@16 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jan 2025

Source: Official LiveMathBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) QwQ-32B-Preview Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) QwQ-32B-Preview Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct

Source: Official LiveMathBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Math

All 113 in Math
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • MathArena Apex Shortlist In use Models solve 47 hard final-answer problems that MathArena selected from 2025 competitions, where the best models scored about 50% at selection. Scored by accuracy over repeated attempts. GPT-5.5 98.4%