- CMMLU(0-shot) 83.1
- MMLU(0-shot) 76.6
- MMLU-Pro(0-shot) 57.6
- GPQA-Diamond(0-shot) 37.4
- DROP(0-shot) 83.1
- HellaSwag(10-shot) 91.2
- KOR-Bench(0-shot) 56.4
- MATH-500(0-shot), Thinking Mode 83
- AIME2024(0-shot), Thinking Mode 20
- LiveCodeBench(2407-2409 Pass@1) 17.8
- HumanEval(Pass@1) 82.3
- IFEval(Prompt-Strict) 79.3
- RULER(4-128K Average) 87.9
- AlpacaEval 2.0(LC WinRate) 51.1
- WildBench(Raw Score) 33.1
- MT-Bench-101(Score 1-10) 8.59
InternLM3-8B-Instruct
InternLM3-8B-Instruct.
InternLM3-8B-Instruct
Open weights Small
- PHYSICS 4.80% #19 /20
- VRBench 47.8% #17 /19
- LiveMathBench 33.6% #4 /5
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 91.2% | #6 of 53 | Lab model card | |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) | 4.00% | #66 of 148 | Official leaderboard | |
| DROP | 83.1% | #22 of 41 | Lab model card | |
| AlpacaEval 2.0 | 51.1% | #9 of 16 | Lab model card | |
| RULER | 87.9% | #24 of 42 | Lab model card | |
| MMLU | 76.6% | #91 of 131 | Lab model card | |
| CMMLU | 83.1% | #12 of 17 | Lab model card | |
| IFEval | 79.3% | #107 of 135 | Lab model card | |
| MMLU-Pro | 57.6% | #148 of 167 | Lab model card | |
| WildBench | 33.1 | #4 of 4 | Lab model card | |
| MT-Bench-101 | 8.59 | #1 of 1 | Lab model card |
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveMathBench | 33.6% | #4 of 5 | Official leaderboard | |
| MATH-500 | 83% | #58 of 70 | Lab model card | |
| GPQA Diamond | 37.4% | #279 of 302 | Lab model card | |
| PHYSICS | 4.80% | #19 of 20 | Official leaderboard | |
| AIME 2024 | 20% | #85 of 88 | Lab model card | |
| KOR-Bench | 56.4% | #4 of 4 | Lab model card |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | 82.3% | #50 of 101 | Lab model card | |
| LiveCodeBench | 17.8% | #50 of 54 | Lab model card |
Professional work
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FinEval 6.0 | 78.5% | #3 of 4 | Official leaderboard |
Vision, audio and robotics
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRBench | 47.8% | #17 of 19 | Official leaderboard |
Its lab's numbers put it at 117.9, number 356 of 404
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 13 capability results Shanghai AI Lab reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 115.7 to 120.1. How we compute it.
- HellaSwag 91.2
- RULER 87.9
- CMMLU 83.1
- DROP 83.1
- MATH-500 83
- HumanEval 82.3
- IFEval 79.3
- MMLU 76.6
- MMLU-Pro 57.6
- AlpacaEval 2.0 51.1
- GPQA Diamond 37.4
- AIME 2024 20
- LiveCodeBench 17.8
Its lab's number next to a leaderboard
Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.