LOFT
Models solve retrieval, RAG, SQL, and many-shot learning tasks with whole corpora of up to one million tokens in context. Scored per task.
- Made by
- Google DeepMind
- Released
- June 2024
- Kind
- Finding facts in long inputs
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 #96 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- February 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- July 2026
In the authors’ words
Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. Leveraging LCLMs' ability to natively ingest and process entire corpora of information offers numerous advantages. It enhances user-friendliness by eliminating the need for specialized knowledge of tools, provides robust end-to-end modeling that minimizes cascading errors in complex pipelines, and allows for the application of sophisticated prompting techniques across the entire system. To assess this paradigm shift, we introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks. However, LCLMs still face challenges in areas like compositional reasoning that are required in SQL-like tasks. Notably, prompting strategies significantly influence performance, emphasizing the need for continued research as context lengths grow. Overall, LOFT provides a rigorous testing ground for LCLMs, showcasing their potential to supplant existing paradigms and tackle novel tasks as model capabilities scale.
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 87% among models released by April 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 87%
- 2 Grok 3 83.3%
- 3 Grok-3 mini 83.1%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 82.1%
- 5
Gemma 4 31B IT 79.5%
- 6
Gemma 4 26B A4B 66.3%
- 7
Gemma 4 E4B 58.5%
- 8
Gemma 4 E2B 50.5%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 87% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Grok 3 | 83.3% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Grok-3 mini | 83.1% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 82.1% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 79.5% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 66.3% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 58.5% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 50.5% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card |
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Google DeepMind’s own number for Gemini 2.5 Pro passed 85% in July 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since February 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2025 | Grok-3 mini | 83.1 | LOFT (128k) [Grok 3 mini, non-reasoning table] |
| Feb 19, 2025 | Grok 3 | 83.3 | LOFT (128k) [Grok 3 Beta, avg of 12 tasks] |
6 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 58.5 | LOFT Text Retrieval Recall@k, 128k, without thinking (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 50.5 | LOFT Text Retrieval Recall@k, 128k, without thinking (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 79.5 | LOFT Text Retrieval, Recall@k, 128k, without thinking (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | | 66.3 | LOFT Text Retrieval, Recall@k, 128k, without thinking (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 87 | LOFT (hard retrieval), <=128K (Table 3); 1M pointwise = 69.8% | Capabilities |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 82.1 | LOFT (hard retrieval), <=128K (Table 3); 1M pointwise = 58.9% | Capabilities |
More in Long context
- MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
- LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy.
Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
- GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
- OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin.
Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
- CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
- AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key.
Step 5 Preview 88.3%