LongBench Chinese
Models answer questions and complete other long-context tasks in the original Chinese headline table. The score is its published average on a percentage scale.
One track of LongBench. The LongBench record keeps lab scores that combine tracks. Authors include the same code completion tasks in both language tables. Importers read the published averages without recomputing them.
- Made by
- THUDM (Tsinghua University)
- Released
- August 2023
- Kind
- Reasoning over long documents
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
In the authors’ words
Although large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance for many language tasks, most of them can only handle texts a few thousand tokens long, limiting their applications on longer sequence inputs, such as books, reports, and codebases. Recent works have proposed methods to improve LLMs' long context capabilities by extending context windows and more sophisticated memory mechanisms. However, comprehensive benchmarks tailored for evaluating long context understanding are lacking. In this paper, we introduce LongBench, the first bilingual, multi-task benchmark for long context understanding, enabling a more rigorous evaluation of long context understanding. LongBench comprises 21 datasets across 6 task categories in both English and Chinese, with an average length of 6,711 words (English) and 13,386 characters (Chinese). These tasks cover key long-text application areas including single-doc QA, multi-doc QA, summarization, few-shot learning, synthetic tasks, and code completion. All datasets in LongBench are standardized into a unified format, allowing for effortless automatic evaluation of LLMs. Upon comprehensive evaluation of 8 LLMs on LongBench, we find that: (1) Commercial model (GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k) outperforms other open-sourced models, but still struggles on longer contexts. (2) Scaled position embedding and fine-tuning on longer sequences lead to substantial improvement on long context understanding. (3) Context compression technique such as retrieval brings improvement for model with weak ability on long contexts, but the performance still lags behind models that have strong long context understanding capability. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/THUDM/LongBench.
ChatGLM3-6B-32k tops the leaderboard with 52.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 1 ChatGLM3-6B-32k zero-shot 52.8%
- 2 GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k (snapshot unspecified) zero-shot 44.5%
- 3 ChatGLM2-6B-32k zero-shot 41.7%
- 4 Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k zero-shot 26.4%
- 5 LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k zero-shot 23.9%
- 6 InternLM-7B-8k zero-shot 18.3%
- 7 XGen-7B-8k zero-shot 15.1%
- 8 Llama2-7B-chat-4k zero-shot 14.3%
Source: Official LongBench Chinese leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ChatGLM3-6B-32k | 52.8% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k (snapshot unspecified) | 44.5% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | ChatGLM2-6B-32k | 41.7% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Vicuna-v1.5-7B-16k | 26.4% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | LongChat-v1.5-7B-32k | 23.9% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | InternLM-7B-8k | 18.3% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | XGen-7B-8k | 15.1% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Llama2-7B-chat-4k | 14.3% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Long context
- MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
- LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy.
Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
- GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
- OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin.
Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
- CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
- AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key.
Step 5 Preview 88.3%