Benchmark Almanac

LongDocURL

GPT-4o May 2024 64.5% leads since December 2024
Seed2.0 Pro 74.7% leads since February 2026
Only in system cards

Models answer 2,325 questions over long documents with more than 33,000 pages in total. Its 20 subtasks cover understanding, numerical reasoning and locating document elements.

ACL 2025 paper. ByteDance Seed reports it in the Seed2.0 model card.

Released
December 2024
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4o May 2024 #161 on the capability index
Last in a system card
February 2026
Last model added
February 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large vision language models (LVLMs) have improved the document understanding capabilities remarkably, enabling the handling of complex document elements, longer contexts, and a wider range of tasks. However, existing document understanding benchmarks have been limited to handling only a small number of pages and fail to provide a comprehensive analysis of layout elements locating. In this paper, we first define three primary task categories: Long Document Understanding, numerical Reasoning, and cross-element Locating, and then propose a comprehensive benchmark, LongDocURL, integrating above three primary tasks and comprising 20 sub-tasks categorized based on different primary tasks and answer evidences. Furthermore, we develop a semi-automated construction pipeline and collect 2,325 high-quality question-answering pairs, covering more than 33,000 pages of documents, significantly outperforming existing benchmarks. Subsequently, we conduct comprehensive evaluation experiments on both open-source and closed-source models across 26 different configurations, revealing critical performance gaps in this field.

Abstract of LongDocURL: a Comprehensive Multimodal Long Document Benchmark Integrating Understanding, Reasoning, and Locating (arXiv:2412.18424, CC0)
7
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-4o leads with 64.5% among models released by September 2024

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 74.7%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o May 2024 64.5%
  2. 2 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 50.9%
  3. 3 Qwen-VL-Max 49.5%
  4. 4 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 30.6%
  5. 5 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 25%
  6. 6 LLaVA-Next-Interleave-DPO-7B 16.2%
  7. 7 Llama 3.2 11B 9.20%

Source: Official LongDocURL leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o May 2024 64.5% May 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 50.9% Official leaderboard
3 Qwen-VL-Max 49.5% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 30.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
5 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 25% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
6 LLaVA-Next-Interleave-DPO-7B 16.2% Official leaderboard
7 Llama 3.2 11B 9.20% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 74.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 GPT-4o May 2024 64.5% May 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen-VL-Max 49.5% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 30.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
5 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 25% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Llama 3.2 11B 9.20% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2024
GPT-4o 64.5%

Source: Official LongDocURL leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro GPT-4o Qwen-VL-Max 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro GPT-4o

Sources: Official LongDocURL leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 74.7 LongDocURL (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%