Benchmark Almanac

MDPBench

OvisOCR3 88.8 tops its leaderboard Gemini 3 Pro 86.4 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Document parsers read 3,400 digital and photographed document images in 17 languages. Public and private splits limit leakage.

On Hugging Face's official benchmark list.

Released
March 2026
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
Kimi K3 #24 on the capability index
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce Multilingual Document Parsing Benchmark, the first benchmark for multilingual digital and photographed document parsing. Document parsing has made remarkable strides, yet almost exclusively on clean, digital, well-formatted pages in a handful of dominant languages. No systematic benchmark exists to evaluate how models perform on digital and photographed documents across diverse scripts and low-resource languages. MDPBench comprises 3,400 document images spanning 17 languages, diverse scripts, and varied photographic conditions, with high-quality annotations produced through a rigorous pipeline of expert model labeling, manual correction, and human verification. To ensure fair comparison and prevent data leakage, we maintain separate public and private evaluation splits. Our comprehensive evaluation of both open-source and closed-source models uncovers a striking finding: while closed-source models (notably Gemini3-Pro) prove relatively robust, open-source alternatives suffer dramatic performance collapse, particularly on non-Latin scripts and real-world photographed documents, with an average drop of 17.8% on photographed documents and 14.0% on non-Latin scripts. These results reveal significant performance imbalances across languages and conditions, and point to concrete directions for building more inclusive, deployment-ready parsing systems. Source available at https://github.com/Yuliang-Liu/MultimodalOCR.

Abstract of MDPBench: A Benchmark for Multilingual Document Parsing in Real-World Scenarios (arXiv:2603.28130, CC0)
42
Entries on its own leaderboard, 12 models we track

OvisOCR3 tops the leaderboard with 88.8

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 3 Pro, at 86.4.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 OvisOCR3 88.8
  2. 2 Gemini 3 Pro 86.4
  3. 3 U2-OCR 86.0
  4. 4 Darwin-180B-RSI 83.7
  5. 5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 83.6
  6. 6 Kimi K3 83.6
  7. 7 MonkeyOCRv2-B-Parsing 83.3
  8. 8 MonkeyOCRv2-S-Parsing 82.5
  9. 9 PepperOCR-VL 82.3
  10. 10 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 80.5
  11. 11 dots.mocr 80.5
  12. 12 chandra-ocr-2 79.7
  13. 13 realocr 79.4
  14. 14 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 78.9
  15. 15 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 78.3
  16. 16 Mistral-OCR-4.0 78.2
  17. 17 Kimi K2.5 77.5
  18. 18 HunyuanOCR-1.5 76.8
  19. 19 dots.ocr 76.5
  20. 20 Seed2.0 Pro 74.2
  21. 21 Claude Sonnet 4.6 73.1
  22. 22 MinerU-2.5-Pro-1.2B 71.0
  23. 23 olmOCR2 70.4
  24. 24 PaddleOCR-VL 69.6
  25. 25 GPT-5.2 68.6
  26. 26 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 68.3
  27. 27 HunyuanOCR 68.3
  28. 28 FalconOCR-1.5 67.9
  29. 29 GLM-OCR 67.3
  30. 30 Qwen3.5-9B 65.7
  31. 31 MonkeyOCRv1.5 65.0
  32. 32 Nanonets-OCR2-3B 64.2
  33. 33 LightOnOCR-2-1B 63.9
  34. 34 Nanonets-OCR-s 63.7
  35. 35 FalconOCR 56.3
  36. 36 Unlimited-OCR 54.1
  37. 37 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 52.2
  38. 38 DeepSeek-OCR 51.8
  39. 39 MinerU-2.5-VLM 46.3
  40. 40 PP-StructureV3 45.4
  41. 41 InternVL3.5-8B 42.7
  42. 42 MinerU-2.5-pipeline 33.5

Source: Official MDPBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 OvisOCR3 88.8 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Pro 86.4 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 U2-OCR 86.0 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Darwin-180B-RSI 83.7 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 83.6 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Kimi K3 83.6 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
7 MonkeyOCRv2-B-Parsing 83.3 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
8 MonkeyOCRv2-S-Parsing 82.5 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
9 PepperOCR-VL 82.3 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 80.5 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
11 dots.mocr 80.5 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
12 chandra-ocr-2 79.7 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
13 realocr 79.4 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
14 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 78.9 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
15 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 78.3 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Mistral-OCR-4.0 78.2 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Kimi K2.5 77.5 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
18 HunyuanOCR-1.5 76.8 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
19 dots.ocr 76.5 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Seed2.0 Pro 74.2 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Claude Sonnet 4.6 73.1 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
22 MinerU-2.5-Pro-1.2B 71.0 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
23 olmOCR2 70.4 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
24 PaddleOCR-VL 69.6 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
25 GPT-5.2 68.6 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 68.3 Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
27 HunyuanOCR 68.3 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
28 FalconOCR-1.5 67.9 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
29 GLM-OCR 67.3 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
30 Qwen3.5-9B 65.7 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
31 MonkeyOCRv1.5 65.0 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Nanonets-OCR2-3B 64.2 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
33 LightOnOCR-2-1B 63.9 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
34 Nanonets-OCR-s 63.7 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
35 FalconOCR 56.3 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
36 Unlimited-OCR 54.1 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
37 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 52.2 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
38 DeepSeek-OCR 51.8 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
39 MinerU-2.5-VLM 46.3 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
40 PP-StructureV3 45.4 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
41 InternVL3.5-8B 42.7 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
42 MinerU-2.5-pipeline 33.5 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2026

Source: Official MDPBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 2026 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 2026

Source: Official MDPBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%