MDPBench
Document parsers read 3,400 digital and photographed document images in 17 languages. Public and private splits limit leakage.
On Hugging Face's official benchmark list.
- Released
- March 2026
- Kind
- Documents, charts and text in images
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
- Kimi K3 #24 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce Multilingual Document Parsing Benchmark, the first benchmark for multilingual digital and photographed document parsing. Document parsing has made remarkable strides, yet almost exclusively on clean, digital, well-formatted pages in a handful of dominant languages. No systematic benchmark exists to evaluate how models perform on digital and photographed documents across diverse scripts and low-resource languages. MDPBench comprises 3,400 document images spanning 17 languages, diverse scripts, and varied photographic conditions, with high-quality annotations produced through a rigorous pipeline of expert model labeling, manual correction, and human verification. To ensure fair comparison and prevent data leakage, we maintain separate public and private evaluation splits. Our comprehensive evaluation of both open-source and closed-source models uncovers a striking finding: while closed-source models (notably Gemini3-Pro) prove relatively robust, open-source alternatives suffer dramatic performance collapse, particularly on non-Latin scripts and real-world photographed documents, with an average drop of 17.8% on photographed documents and 14.0% on non-Latin scripts. These results reveal significant performance imbalances across languages and conditions, and point to concrete directions for building more inclusive, deployment-ready parsing systems. Source available at https://github.com/Yuliang-Liu/MultimodalOCR.
OvisOCR3 tops the leaderboard with 88.8
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 3 Pro, at 86.4.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 88.8 OvisOCR3
- 86.4
Gemini 3 Pro
- 86.0 U2-OCR
- 83.7 Darwin-180B-RSI
- 83.6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 83.6 Kimi K3
- 83.3 MonkeyOCRv2-B-Parsing
- 82.5 MonkeyOCRv2-S-Parsing
- 82.3 PepperOCR-VL
- 80.5
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 80.5 dots.mocr
- 79.7 chandra-ocr-2
- 79.4 realocr
- 78.9 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6
- 78.3 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5
- 78.2 Mistral-OCR-4.0
- 77.5 Kimi K2.5
- 76.8 HunyuanOCR-1.5
- 76.5 dots.ocr
- 74.2
Seed2.0 Pro
- 73.1 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 71.0 MinerU-2.5-Pro-1.2B
- 70.4 olmOCR2
- 69.6 PaddleOCR-VL
- 68.6 GPT-5.2
- 68.3
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- 68.3 HunyuanOCR
- 67.9 FalconOCR-1.5
- 67.3 GLM-OCR
- 65.7
Qwen3.5-9B
- 65.0 MonkeyOCRv1.5
- 64.2 Nanonets-OCR2-3B
- 63.9 LightOnOCR-2-1B
- 63.7 Nanonets-OCR-s
- 56.3 FalconOCR
- 54.1 Unlimited-OCR
- 52.2 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B
- 51.8 DeepSeek-OCR
- 46.3 MinerU-2.5-VLM
- 45.4 PP-StructureV3
- 42.7
InternVL3.5-8B
- 33.5 MinerU-2.5-pipeline
- 1 OvisOCR3 88.8
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro 86.4
- 3 U2-OCR 86.0
- 4 Darwin-180B-RSI 83.7
- 5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 83.6
- 6 Kimi K3 83.6
- 7 MonkeyOCRv2-B-Parsing 83.3
- 8 MonkeyOCRv2-S-Parsing 82.5
- 9 PepperOCR-VL 82.3
- 10
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 80.5
- 11 dots.mocr 80.5
- 12 chandra-ocr-2 79.7
- 13 realocr 79.4
- 14 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 78.9
- 15 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 78.3
- 16 Mistral-OCR-4.0 78.2
- 17 Kimi K2.5 77.5
- 18 HunyuanOCR-1.5 76.8
- 19 dots.ocr 76.5
- 20
Seed2.0 Pro 74.2
- 21 Claude Sonnet 4.6 73.1
- 22 MinerU-2.5-Pro-1.2B 71.0
- 23 olmOCR2 70.4
- 24 PaddleOCR-VL 69.6
- 25 GPT-5.2 68.6
- 26
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 68.3
- 27 HunyuanOCR 68.3
- 28 FalconOCR-1.5 67.9
- 29 GLM-OCR 67.3
- 30
Qwen3.5-9B 65.7
- 31 MonkeyOCRv1.5 65.0
- 32 Nanonets-OCR2-3B 64.2
- 33 LightOnOCR-2-1B 63.9
- 34 Nanonets-OCR-s 63.7
- 35 FalconOCR 56.3
- 36 Unlimited-OCR 54.1
- 37 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 52.2
- 38 DeepSeek-OCR 51.8
- 39 MinerU-2.5-VLM 46.3
- 40 PP-StructureV3 45.4
- 41
InternVL3.5-8B 42.7
- 42 MinerU-2.5-pipeline 33.5
Source: Official MDPBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OvisOCR3 | 88.8 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 86.4 | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | U2-OCR | 86.0 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Darwin-180B-RSI | 83.7 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 83.6 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Kimi K3 | 83.6 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | MonkeyOCRv2-B-Parsing | 83.3 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | MonkeyOCRv2-S-Parsing | 82.5 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | PepperOCR-VL | 82.3 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 80.5 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | dots.mocr | 80.5 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | chandra-ocr-2 | 79.7 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | realocr | 79.4 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 | 78.9 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | 78.3 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Mistral-OCR-4.0 | 78.2 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Kimi K2.5 | 77.5 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | HunyuanOCR-1.5 | 76.8 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | dots.ocr | 76.5 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 74.2 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 73.1 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | MinerU-2.5-Pro-1.2B | 71.0 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | olmOCR2 | 70.4 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | PaddleOCR-VL | 69.6 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GPT-5.2 | 68.6 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 68.3 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | HunyuanOCR | 68.3 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | FalconOCR-1.5 | 67.9 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | GLM-OCR | 67.3 | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 65.7 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | MonkeyOCRv1.5 | 65.0 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Nanonets-OCR2-3B | 64.2 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | LightOnOCR-2-1B | 63.9 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | Nanonets-OCR-s | 63.7 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | FalconOCR | 56.3 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Unlimited-OCR | 54.1 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | MonkeyOCR-pro-3B | 52.2 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | DeepSeek-OCR | 51.8 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | MinerU-2.5-VLM | 46.3 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | PP-StructureV3 | 45.4 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 42.7 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | MinerU-2.5-pipeline | 33.5 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MDPBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official MDPBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%