MIEB
Image and image-text embedding models are scored on 130 tasks in 38 languages, grouped into 8 task types such as retrieval, clustering and classification.
Part of the MTEB framework. Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 card reports the MIEB lite subset as Mean(TaskType). 50 models in the paper.
- Made by
- MTEB community
- Released
- April 2025
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
In the authors’ words
Image representations are often evaluated through disjointed, task-specific protocols, leading to a fragmented understanding of model capabilities. For instance, it is unclear whether an image embedding model adept at clustering images is equally good at retrieving relevant images given a piece of text. We introduce the Massive Image Embedding Benchmark (MIEB) to evaluate the performance of image and image-text embedding models across the broadest spectrum to date. MIEB spans 38 languages across 130 individual tasks, which we group into 8 high-level categories. We benchmark 50 models across our benchmark, finding that no single method dominates across all task categories. We reveal hidden capabilities in advanced vision models such as their accurate visual representation of texts, and their yet limited capabilities in interleaved encodings and matching images and texts in the presence of confounders. We also show that the performance of vision encoders on MIEB correlates highly with their performance when used in multimodal large language models. Our code, dataset, and leaderboard are publicly available at https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb.
DNA-VL-STEER-2B tops the leaderboard with 67.5
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 67.5 DNA-VL-STEER-2B
- 65.1 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small
- 63.8 voyage-multimodal-3
- 58.2 e5-v
- 57.1 siglip-so400m-patch14-384
- 57.0 siglip-large-patch16-384
- 55.1 siglip-large-patch16-256
- 55.0 siglip-base-patch16-512
- 54.5 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-nano
- 54.2 CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k
- 54.2 siglip-base-patch16-384
- 53.5 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus
- 53.4 CLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K
- 53.1 siglip-base-patch16-256-multilingual
- 52.7 CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K
- 52.4 CLIP-ViT-g-14-laion2B-s34B-b88K
- 52.3 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14
- 52.0 siglip-base-patch16-256
- 50.9 siglip-base-patch16-224
- 50.6 CLIP-ViT-L-14-laion2B-s32B-b82K
- 50.5 VLM2Vec-LoRA
- 50.4 VLM2Vec-Full
- 49.9 clip-vit-large-patch14
- 49.6 CLIP-ViT-B-16-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K
- 47.3 EVA02-CLIP-L-14
- 46.2 clip-vit-base-patch16
- 45.9 blip-itm-large-coco
- 45.2 CLIP-ViT-B-32-laion2B-s34B-b79K
- 44.9 jina-clip-v1
- 44.6 blip-itm-base-coco
- 44.4 blip-itm-large-flickr
- 44.3 CLIP-ViT-B-32-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K
- 44.2 align-base
- 43.8 bge-visualized-m3
- 43.0 blip-itm-base-flickr
- 41.6 bge-visualized-base
- 41.5 EVA02-CLIP-B-16
- 41.4 clip-vit-base-patch32
- 39.7 blip2-opt-2.7b
- 39.6 blip2-opt-6.7b-coco
- 39.3 nomic-embed-vision-v1.5
- 1 DNA-VL-STEER-2B 67.5
- 2 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small 65.1
- 3 voyage-multimodal-3 63.8
- 4 e5-v 58.2
- 5 siglip-so400m-patch14-384 57.1
- 6 siglip-large-patch16-384 57.0
- 7 siglip-large-patch16-256 55.1
- 8 siglip-base-patch16-512 55.0
- 9 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-nano 54.5
- 10 CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k 54.2
- 11 siglip-base-patch16-384 54.2
- 12 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus 53.5
- 13 CLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 53.4
- 14 siglip-base-patch16-256-multilingual 53.1
- 15 CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K 52.7
- 16 CLIP-ViT-g-14-laion2B-s34B-b88K 52.4
- 17 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14 52.3
- 18 siglip-base-patch16-256 52.0
- 19 siglip-base-patch16-224 50.9
- 20 CLIP-ViT-L-14-laion2B-s32B-b82K 50.6
- 21 VLM2Vec-LoRA 50.5
- 22 VLM2Vec-Full 50.4
- 23 clip-vit-large-patch14 49.9
- 24 CLIP-ViT-B-16-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 49.6
- 25 EVA02-CLIP-L-14 47.3
- 26 clip-vit-base-patch16 46.2
- 27 blip-itm-large-coco 45.9
- 28 CLIP-ViT-B-32-laion2B-s34B-b79K 45.2
- 29 jina-clip-v1 44.9
- 30 blip-itm-base-coco 44.6
- 31 blip-itm-large-flickr 44.4
- 32 CLIP-ViT-B-32-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 44.3
- 33 align-base 44.2
- 34 bge-visualized-m3 43.8
- 35 blip-itm-base-flickr 43.0
- 36 bge-visualized-base 41.6
- 37 EVA02-CLIP-B-16 41.5
- 38 clip-vit-base-patch32 41.4
- 39 blip2-opt-2.7b 39.7
- 40 blip2-opt-6.7b-coco 39.6
- 41 nomic-embed-vision-v1.5 39.3
Source: Official MIEB leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DNA-VL-STEER-2B | 67.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small | 65.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | voyage-multimodal-3 | 63.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | e5-v | 58.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | siglip-so400m-patch14-384 | 57.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | siglip-large-patch16-384 | 57.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | siglip-large-patch16-256 | 55.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | siglip-base-patch16-512 | 55.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | jina-embeddings-v5-omni-nano | 54.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k | 54.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | siglip-base-patch16-384 | 54.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus | 53.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | CLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K | 53.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | siglip-base-patch16-256-multilingual | 53.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K | 52.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | CLIP-ViT-g-14-laion2B-s34B-b88K | 52.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14 | 52.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | siglip-base-patch16-256 | 52.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | siglip-base-patch16-224 | 50.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | CLIP-ViT-L-14-laion2B-s32B-b82K | 50.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | VLM2Vec-LoRA | 50.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | VLM2Vec-Full | 50.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | clip-vit-large-patch14 | 49.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | CLIP-ViT-B-16-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K | 49.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | EVA02-CLIP-L-14 | 47.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | clip-vit-base-patch16 | 46.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | blip-itm-large-coco | 45.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 28 | CLIP-ViT-B-32-laion2B-s34B-b79K | 45.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 29 | jina-clip-v1 | 44.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 30 | blip-itm-base-coco | 44.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 31 | blip-itm-large-flickr | 44.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 32 | CLIP-ViT-B-32-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K | 44.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 33 | align-base | 44.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 34 | bge-visualized-m3 | 43.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 35 | blip-itm-base-flickr | 43.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 36 | bge-visualized-base | 41.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 37 | EVA02-CLIP-B-16 | 41.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 38 | clip-vit-base-patch32 | 41.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 39 | blip2-opt-2.7b | 39.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 40 | blip2-opt-6.7b-coco | 39.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 41 | nomic-embed-vision-v1.5 | 39.3 | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%