Benchmark Almanac

MIEB

DNA-VL-STEER-2B 67.5 tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Image and image-text embedding models are scored on 130 tasks in 38 languages, grouped into 8 task types such as retrieval, clustering and classification.

Part of the MTEB framework. Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 card reports the MIEB lite subset as Mean(TaskType). 50 models in the paper.

Made by
MTEB community
Released
April 2025
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public

In the authors’ words

Image representations are often evaluated through disjointed, task-specific protocols, leading to a fragmented understanding of model capabilities. For instance, it is unclear whether an image embedding model adept at clustering images is equally good at retrieving relevant images given a piece of text. We introduce the Massive Image Embedding Benchmark (MIEB) to evaluate the performance of image and image-text embedding models across the broadest spectrum to date. MIEB spans 38 languages across 130 individual tasks, which we group into 8 high-level categories. We benchmark 50 models across our benchmark, finding that no single method dominates across all task categories. We reveal hidden capabilities in advanced vision models such as their accurate visual representation of texts, and their yet limited capabilities in interleaved encodings and matching images and texts in the presence of confounders. We also show that the performance of vision encoders on MIEB correlates highly with their performance when used in multimodal large language models. Our code, dataset, and leaderboard are publicly available at https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb.

Abstract of MIEB: Massive Image Embedding Benchmark (arXiv:2504.10471, CC0)
41
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

DNA-VL-STEER-2B tops the leaderboard with 67.5

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 DNA-VL-STEER-2B 67.5
  2. 2 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small 65.1
  3. 3 voyage-multimodal-3 63.8
  4. 4 e5-v 58.2
  5. 5 siglip-so400m-patch14-384 57.1
  6. 6 siglip-large-patch16-384 57.0
  7. 7 siglip-large-patch16-256 55.1
  8. 8 siglip-base-patch16-512 55.0
  9. 9 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-nano 54.5
  10. 10 CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k 54.2
  11. 11 siglip-base-patch16-384 54.2
  12. 12 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus 53.5
  13. 13 CLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 53.4
  14. 14 siglip-base-patch16-256-multilingual 53.1
  15. 15 CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K 52.7
  16. 16 CLIP-ViT-g-14-laion2B-s34B-b88K 52.4
  17. 17 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14 52.3
  18. 18 siglip-base-patch16-256 52.0
  19. 19 siglip-base-patch16-224 50.9
  20. 20 CLIP-ViT-L-14-laion2B-s32B-b82K 50.6
  21. 21 VLM2Vec-LoRA 50.5
  22. 22 VLM2Vec-Full 50.4
  23. 23 clip-vit-large-patch14 49.9
  24. 24 CLIP-ViT-B-16-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 49.6
  25. 25 EVA02-CLIP-L-14 47.3
  26. 26 clip-vit-base-patch16 46.2
  27. 27 blip-itm-large-coco 45.9
  28. 28 CLIP-ViT-B-32-laion2B-s34B-b79K 45.2
  29. 29 jina-clip-v1 44.9
  30. 30 blip-itm-base-coco 44.6
  31. 31 blip-itm-large-flickr 44.4
  32. 32 CLIP-ViT-B-32-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 44.3
  33. 33 align-base 44.2
  34. 34 bge-visualized-m3 43.8
  35. 35 blip-itm-base-flickr 43.0
  36. 36 bge-visualized-base 41.6
  37. 37 EVA02-CLIP-B-16 41.5
  38. 38 clip-vit-base-patch32 41.4
  39. 39 blip2-opt-2.7b 39.7
  40. 40 blip2-opt-6.7b-coco 39.6
  41. 41 nomic-embed-vision-v1.5 39.3

Source: Official MIEB leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 DNA-VL-STEER-2B 67.5 Official leaderboard
2 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small 65.1 Official leaderboard
3 voyage-multimodal-3 63.8 Official leaderboard
4 e5-v 58.2 Official leaderboard
5 siglip-so400m-patch14-384 57.1 Official leaderboard
6 siglip-large-patch16-384 57.0 Official leaderboard
7 siglip-large-patch16-256 55.1 Official leaderboard
8 siglip-base-patch16-512 55.0 Official leaderboard
9 jina-embeddings-v5-omni-nano 54.5 Official leaderboard
10 CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k 54.2 Official leaderboard
11 siglip-base-patch16-384 54.2 Official leaderboard
12 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus 53.5 Official leaderboard
13 CLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 53.4 Official leaderboard
14 siglip-base-patch16-256-multilingual 53.1 Official leaderboard
15 CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K 52.7 Official leaderboard
16 CLIP-ViT-g-14-laion2B-s34B-b88K 52.4 Official leaderboard
17 EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14 52.3 Official leaderboard
18 siglip-base-patch16-256 52.0 Official leaderboard
19 siglip-base-patch16-224 50.9 Official leaderboard
20 CLIP-ViT-L-14-laion2B-s32B-b82K 50.6 Official leaderboard
21 VLM2Vec-LoRA 50.5 Official leaderboard
22 VLM2Vec-Full 50.4 Official leaderboard
23 clip-vit-large-patch14 49.9 Official leaderboard
24 CLIP-ViT-B-16-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 49.6 Official leaderboard
25 EVA02-CLIP-L-14 47.3 Official leaderboard
26 clip-vit-base-patch16 46.2 Official leaderboard
27 blip-itm-large-coco 45.9 Official leaderboard
28 CLIP-ViT-B-32-laion2B-s34B-b79K 45.2 Official leaderboard
29 jina-clip-v1 44.9 Official leaderboard
30 blip-itm-base-coco 44.6 Official leaderboard
31 blip-itm-large-flickr 44.4 Official leaderboard
32 CLIP-ViT-B-32-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K 44.3 Official leaderboard
33 align-base 44.2 Official leaderboard
34 bge-visualized-m3 43.8 Official leaderboard
35 blip-itm-base-flickr 43.0 Official leaderboard
36 bge-visualized-base 41.6 Official leaderboard
37 EVA02-CLIP-B-16 41.5 Official leaderboard
38 clip-vit-base-patch32 41.4 Official leaderboard
39 blip2-opt-2.7b 39.7 Official leaderboard
40 blip2-opt-6.7b-coco 39.6 Official leaderboard
41 nomic-embed-vision-v1.5 39.3 Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%