Benchmark Almanac

MMDU

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 70.2 tops its leaderboard Claude 3 Opus 62.6 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Vision-language models hold long conversations about many images, up to 20 images and 27 turns per dialog. A GPT-4o judge scores the answers.

Questions come from Wikipedia images and text, written by annotators with GPT-4o help. It ships with the MMDU-45k tuning set. VLMEvalKit supports it.

Released
June 2024
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
Last model added
April 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Generating natural and meaningful responses to communicate with multi-modal human inputs is a fundamental capability of Large Vision-Language Models(LVLMs). While current open-source LVLMs demonstrate promising performance in simplified scenarios such as single-turn single-image input, they fall short in real-world conversation scenarios such as following instructions in a long context history with multi-turn and multi-images. Existing LVLM benchmarks primarily focus on single-choice questions or short-form responses, which do not adequately assess the capabilities of LVLMs in real-world human-AI interaction applications. Therefore, we introduce MMDU, a comprehensive benchmark, and MMDU-45k, a large-scale instruction tuning dataset, designed to evaluate and improve LVLMs' abilities in multi-turn and multi-image conversations. We employ the clustering algorithm to ffnd the relevant images and textual descriptions from the open-source Wikipedia and construct the question-answer pairs by human annotators with the assistance of the GPT-4o model. MMDU has a maximum of 18k image+text tokens, 20 images, and 27 turns, which is at least 5x longer than previous benchmarks and poses challenges to current LVLMs. Our in-depth analysis of 15 representative LVLMs using MMDU reveals that open-source LVLMs lag behind closed-source counterparts due to limited conversational instruction tuning data. We demonstrate that ffne-tuning open-source LVLMs on MMDU-45k signiffcantly address this gap, generating longer and more accurate conversations, and improving scores on MMDU and existing benchmarks (MMStar: +1.1%, MathVista: +1.5%, ChartQA:+1.2%). Our contributions pave the way for bridging the gap between current LVLM models and real-world application demands. This project is available at https://github.com/Liuziyu77/MMDU.

Abstract of MMDU: A Multi-Turn Multi-Image Dialog Understanding Benchmark and Instruction-Tuning Dataset for LVLMs (arXiv:2406.11833, CC0)
17
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 70.2

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3 Opus, at 62.6.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 70.2
  2. 2 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 66.3
  3. 3 Claude 3 Opus 62.6
  4. 4 InternLM-XC2 7B + MMDU-45k 50.1
  5. 5 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 46.9
  6. 6 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 42.8
  7. 7 Qwen-VL-7B 39.3
  8. 8 InternVL-Chat V1.5 26B 37.4
  9. 9 LLaVA 1.5 7B + MMDU-45k 37.2
  10. 10 InternLM-XC2 7B 35.6
  11. 11 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 35.3
  12. 12 Yi-VL-6B 33.2
  13. 13 MiniCPM-V-2.5 8B 33.0
  14. 14 LLaVA 1.5 7B 32.2
  15. 15 DeepSeek-VL 8B 30.8
  16. 16 Idefics2-8B 25.4
  17. 17 Monkey 10B 14.1

Source: Official MMDU leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 70.2 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 66.3 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3 Opus 62.6 Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
4 InternLM-XC2 7B + MMDU-45k 50.1 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 46.9 Official leaderboard
6 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 42.8 Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen-VL-7B 39.3 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL-Chat V1.5 26B 37.4 Official leaderboard
9 LLaVA 1.5 7B + MMDU-45k 37.2 Official leaderboard
10 InternLM-XC2 7B 35.6 Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 35.3 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
12 Yi-VL-6B 33.2 Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
13 MiniCPM-V-2.5 8B 33.0 Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA 1.5 7B 32.2 Official leaderboard
15 DeepSeek-VL 8B 30.8 Official leaderboard
16 Idefics2-8B 25.4 Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Monkey 10B 14.1 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2024

Source: Official MMDU leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 2024 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 2024

Source: Official MMDU leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%