Benchmark Almanac

MME-CoT

Kimi k1.5 64.2% leads since February 2025
Not in model cards

Models reason step by step on image questions in math, science, OCR, logic, space-time and general scenes. A judge scores reasoning quality, robustness and efficiency.

Part of the MME family with MME, MME-RealWorld and Video-MME. Reports often give the CoT quality F1.

Released
February 2025
Kind
General visual questions
Level
University
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
January 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Answering questions with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its impact on Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) still lacks a systematic assessment and in-depth investigation. In this paper, we introduce MME-CoT, a specialized benchmark evaluating the CoT reasoning performance of LMMs, spanning six domains: math, science, OCR, logic, space-time, and general scenes. As the first comprehensive study in this area, we propose a thorough evaluation suite incorporating three novel metrics that assess the reasoning quality, robustness, and efficiency at a fine-grained level. Leveraging curated high-quality data and a unique evaluation strategy, we conduct an in-depth analysis of state-of-the-art LMMs, uncovering several key insights: 1) Models with reflection mechanism demonstrate a superior CoT quality, with Kimi k1.5 outperforming GPT-4o and demonstrating the highest quality results; 2) CoT prompting often degrades LMM performance on perception-heavy tasks, suggesting a potentially harmful overthinking behavior; and 3) Although the CoT quality is high, LMMs with reflection exhibit significant inefficiency in both normal response and self-correction phases. We hope MME-CoT serves as a foundation for advancing multimodal reasoning in LMMs. Project Page: https://mmecot.github.io/

Abstract of MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiency (arXiv:2502.09621, CC0)
15
Entries on its own leaderboard, 10 models we track

Kimi k1.5 leads with 64.2% among models released by January 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Kimi k1.5 64.2%
  2. 2 JT-VL-Chat 64.1%
  3. 3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 64%
  4. 4 QVQ-72B-Preview 62%
  5. 5 Virgo-72B 60.8%
  6. 6 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 56.2%
  7. 7 InternVL2.5-78B-MPO 52.7%
  8. 8 InternVL2.5-8B-MPO 43%
  9. 9 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 42.1%
  10. 10 InternVL2.5-8B 41.1%
  11. 11 MiniCPM-V-2_6 39.8%
  12. 12 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 36.3%
  13. 13 LLaVA-CoT 34.9%
  14. 14 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 30.9%
  15. 15 Mulberry 27.4%

Source: Official MME-CoT leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi k1.5 64.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
2 JT-VL-Chat 64.1% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 64% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 QVQ-72B-Preview 62% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Virgo-72B 60.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 56.2% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
7 InternVL2.5-78B-MPO 52.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL2.5-8B-MPO 43% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 42.1% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
10 InternVL2.5-8B 41.1% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
11 MiniCPM-V-2_6 39.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
12 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 36.3% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
13 LLaVA-CoT 34.9% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 30.9% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Mulberry 27.4% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Feb 2025
Kimi k1.5 64.2%

Source: Official MME-CoT leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi k1.5 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct MiniCPM-V-2_6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi k1.5 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Source: Official MME-CoT leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%