Benchmark Almanac

Multi-SWE-bench mini

Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 25.8% leads since July 2025
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 25.8% leads since July 2025
Dropped

Agents fix real GitHub issues in 8 programming languages, a 400-instance subset of Multi-SWE-bench made for cheaper runs. Scored by tests passing.

Released April 15th, 2025. Scores differ from the full Multi-SWE-bench.

Made by
ByteDance Seed
Released
April 2025
Kind
Fixing real repositories
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
July 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
July 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The task of issue resolving is to modify a codebase to generate a patch that addresses a given issue. However, existing benchmarks, such as SWE-bench, focus almost exclusively on Python, making them insufficient for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse software ecosystems. To address this, we introduce a multilingual issue-resolving benchmark, called Multi-SWE-bench, covering Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++. It includes a total of 1,632 high-quality instances, which were carefully annotated from 2,456 candidates by 68 expert annotators, ensuring that the benchmark can provide an accurate and reliable evaluation. Based on Multi-SWE-bench, we evaluate a series of state-of-the-art models using three representative methods (Agentless, SWE-agent, and OpenHands) and present a comprehensive analysis with key empirical insights. In addition, we launch a Multi-SWE-RL open-source community, aimed at building large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) training datasets for issue-resolving tasks. As an initial contribution, we release a set of 4,723 well-structured instances spanning seven programming languages, laying a solid foundation for RL research in this domain. More importantly, we open-source our entire data production pipeline, along with detailed tutorials, encouraging the open-source community to continuously contribute and expand the dataset. We envision our Multi-SWE-bench and the ever-growing Multi-SWE-RL community as catalysts for advancing RL toward its full potential, bringing us one step closer to the dawn of AGI.

Abstract of Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving (arXiv:2504.02605, CC0)
13
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B leads with 25.8% among models released by July 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B leads with 25.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B self-reported 25.8%
  2. 2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet verified 18.3%
  3. 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) verified 18%
  4. 4 Claude-3.5-Sonnet(Oct) verified 12.3%
  5. 5 OpenAI-o1 verified 10.8%
  6. 6 Llama 4 Maverick verified 10.3%
  7. 7 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) verified 10%
  8. 8 Doubao-1.5-thinking verified 9.50%
  9. 9 OpenAI-o3-mini-high verified 9.00%
  10. 10 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) verified 8.00%
  11. 11 GPT-4o-1120 verified 7.50%
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-72B verified 6.00%
  13. 13 Doubao-1.5-pro verified 4.50%

Source: Official Multi-SWE-bench mini leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 25.8% self-reported, MopenHands Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 18.3% verified, MopenHands Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 18% verified, MopenHands Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude-3.5-Sonnet(Oct) 12.3% verified, MopenHands Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
5 OpenAI-o1 10.8% verified, MagentLess Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Llama 4 Maverick 10.3% verified, MagentLess Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 10% verified, MagentLess Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Doubao-1.5-thinking 9.50% verified, MagentLess Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 OpenAI-o3-mini-high 9.00% verified, MagentLess Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 8.00% verified, MagentLess Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4o-1120 7.50% verified, MagentLess Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-72B 6.00% verified, MagentLess Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Doubao-1.5-pro 4.50% verified, MagentLess Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 25.8% Jul 2025 Lab model card
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 18.3% verified, MopenHands Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Llama 4 Maverick 10.3% verified, MagentLess Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-72B 6.00% verified, MagentLess Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Doubao-1.5-pro 4.50% verified, MagentLess Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct 4.00% Jun 2025 Lab model card

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in April 2025 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2025

Source: Official Multi-SWE-bench mini leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B Claude 3.7 Sonnet Qwen2.5-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Sources: Official Multi-SWE-bench mini leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since July 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jul 22, 2025 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 25.8 Multi-SWE-bench mini

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 4, 2025 Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct technical report 4 Multi-SWE-bench mini, Agentless (Table 15) Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 25.8% Multi-SWE-bench mini 25.8% Leaderboard, self-reported, MopenHands Same

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471