Benchmark Almanac

o11y-bench

Claude Opus 5.5 93.8% leads since September 2026
Not in model cards

Agents query metrics, logs and traces in a live Grafana stack, investigate incidents and fix dashboards. Grading checks claims against facts read from the same environment.

64 tasks built on Harbor, scored pass^3. Version 1.1 (October 28th, 2026) made grading more grounded and reproducible, so check comparability with 1.0 scores.

Made by
Grafana Labs
Released
April 2026
Kind
Terminal tasks
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
23
Entries on its own leaderboard, 22 models we track

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 93.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 medium 93.8%
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh 90.6%
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra low 87.5%
  4. 4 GPT-6.1 Sol medium 87.5%
  5. 5 Gemini 4 Argon low 87.5%
  6. 6 Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh 87.5%
  7. 7 Muse Spark Open high 85.9%
  8. 8 GPT-6 Luna xhigh 84.4%
  9. 9 Kimi K3 max 81.3%
  10. 10 GLM-5.3 max 81.3%
  11. 11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max 81.3%
  12. 12 mistral-large-4-0 high 81.3%
  13. 13 Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 78.1%
  14. 14 Grok 4.7 high 76.6%
  15. 15 GPT-5.6 Luna low 65.6%
  16. 16 Qwen 3.8 27B low 64.1%
  17. 17 MiniMax-M3.1-Flash high 64.1%
  18. 18 Gemma 4 31B IT low 56.3%
  19. 19 GPT-5.4 Mini low 54.7%
  20. 20 Qwen3.6 27B high 51.6%
  21. 21 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B high 43.8%
  22. 22 Claude Haiku 4.5 off 26.6%
  23. 23 GPT-5.4 Nano off 10.9%

Source: Official o11y-bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 93.8% medium Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 90.6% xhigh Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Astra 87.5% low Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-6.1 Sol 87.5% medium Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 4 Argon 87.5% low Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Haiku 5.5 87.5% xhigh Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Muse Spark Open 85.9% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-6 Luna 84.4% xhigh Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Kimi K3 81.3% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GLM-5.3 81.3% max Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 81.3% max Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
12 mistral-large-4-0 81.3% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen 3.8 Max 78.1% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Grok 4.7 76.6% high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5.6 Luna 65.6% low Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen 3.8 27B 64.1% low Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
17 MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 64.1% high Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Gemma 4 31B IT 56.3% low Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
19 GPT-5.4 Mini 54.7% low Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen3.6 27B 51.6% high Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 43.8% high Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.6% off Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-5.4 Nano 10.9% off Mar 2026 Official leaderboard

Pass^3 vs. cost

The line joins the runs that no other run beats on both measures. We redrew this chart from the numbers on the official leaderboard.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0$0.5$1$1.5$2 Cost per trial ($), lower is better Pass^3 Claude Haiku 4.5 (off): Pass^3 26.6%, cost per trial $0.08 GPT-5.4 Mini (low): Pass^3 54.7%, cost per trial $0.02 GPT-5.4 Nano (off): Pass^3 10.9%, cost per trial $0.005 Gemma 4 31B IT (low): Pass^3 56.3%, cost per trial $0.01 Gemma 4 31B IT (high): Pass^3 53.1%, cost per trial $0.01 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (high): Pass^3 43.8%, cost per trial $0.02 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (low): Pass^3 29.7%, cost per trial $0.03 Qwen3.6 27B (high): Pass^3 51.6%, cost per trial $0.05 Qwen3.6 27B (low): Pass^3 40.6%, cost per trial $0.04 GPT-5.6 Luna (low): Pass^3 65.6%, cost per trial $0.005 Kimi K3 (max): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.09 Kimi K3 (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.07 Kimi K3 (low): Pass^3 68.8%, cost per trial $0.04 Qwen 3.8 Max (xhigh): Pass^3 78.1%, cost per trial $0.25 Qwen 3.8 Max (low): Pass^3 73.4%, cost per trial $0.14 Qwen 3.8 Max (medium): Pass^3 73.4%, cost per trial $0.14 Qwen 3.8 Max (off): Pass^3 65.6%, cost per trial $0.1 GLM-5.3 (max): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.03 GLM-5.3 (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.02 GLM-5.3 (low): Pass^3 64.1%, cost per trial $0.01 Qwen 3.8 27B (low): Pass^3 64.1%, cost per trial $0.06 Qwen 3.8 27B (high): Pass^3 60.9%, cost per trial $0.07 GPT-6 Astra (low): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.2 GPT-6 Astra (medium): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.24 GPT-6 Astra (xhigh): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.36 GPT-6 Astra (high): Pass^3 82.8%, cost per trial $0.31 Grok 4.7 (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.17 Grok 4.7 (xhigh): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.19 Grok 4.7 (medium): Pass^3 70.3%, cost per trial $0.14 Grok 4.7 (low): Pass^3 68.8%, cost per trial $0.09 Grok 4.7 (max): Pass^3 26.6%, cost per trial $0.14 Claude Opus 5.5 (max): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $1.69 Claude Opus 5.5 (low): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.13 Claude Opus 5.5 (high): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.34 Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.66 GPT-6 Luna (off): Pass^3 48.4%, cost per trial $0.005 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh): Pass^3 90.6%, cost per trial $0.29 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $1.34 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.06 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low): Pass^3 71.9%, cost per trial $0.06 GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.06 GPT-6.1 Sol (high): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.05 GPT-6.1 Sol (low): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.03 Gemini 4 Argon (low): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.27 Gemini 4 Argon (medium): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.22 Gemini 4 Argon (high): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.37 Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.06 Claude Haiku 5.5 (max): Pass^3 82.8%, cost per trial $0.22 Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium): Pass^3 78.1%, cost per trial $0.01 Claude Haiku 5.5 (low): Pass^3 68.8%, cost per trial $0.007 Claude Haiku 5.5 (off): Pass^3 62.5%, cost per trial $0.008 Muse Spark Open (high): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.12 Muse Spark Open (xhigh): Pass^3 79.7%, cost per trial $0.12 Muse Spark Open (medium): Pass^3 70.3%, cost per trial $0.09 Muse Spark Open (low): Pass^3 65.6%, cost per trial $0.06 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.03 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (low): Pass^3 79.7%, cost per trial $0.01 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (high): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.01 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (off): Pass^3 54.7%, cost per trial $0.009 MiniMax-M3.1-Flash (high): Pass^3 64.1%, cost per trial $0.03 MiniMax-M3.1-Flash (low): Pass^3 51.6%, cost per trial $0.01 mistral-large-4-0 (high): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.05. Not in our model list mistral-large-4-0 (low): Pass^3 78.1%, cost per trial $0.05. Not in our model list Claude Opus 5.5 (medium): Pass^3 93.8%, cost per trial $0.26 GPT-6 Luna (xhigh): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.007 GPT-6 Luna (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.005 GPT-6 Luna (medium): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.004 GPT-6 Luna (low): Pass^3 56.3%, cost per trial $0.002 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): Pass^3 89.1%, cost per trial $0.11 GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.04 Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.02 Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)GPT-6 Luna (xhigh)GPT-6 Luna (high)GPT-6 Luna (medium)GPT-6 Luna (low) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0$0.5$1$1.5$2 Cost per trial ($), lower is better Pass^3 Claude Haiku 4.5 (off): Pass^3 26.6%, cost per trial $0.08 GPT-5.4 Mini (low): Pass^3 54.7%, cost per trial $0.02 GPT-5.4 Nano (off): Pass^3 10.9%, cost per trial $0.005 Gemma 4 31B IT (low): Pass^3 56.3%, cost per trial $0.01 Gemma 4 31B IT (high): Pass^3 53.1%, cost per trial $0.01 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (high): Pass^3 43.8%, cost per trial $0.02 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (low): Pass^3 29.7%, cost per trial $0.03 Qwen3.6 27B (high): Pass^3 51.6%, cost per trial $0.05 Qwen3.6 27B (low): Pass^3 40.6%, cost per trial $0.04 GPT-5.6 Luna (low): Pass^3 65.6%, cost per trial $0.005 Kimi K3 (max): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.09 Kimi K3 (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.07 Kimi K3 (low): Pass^3 68.8%, cost per trial $0.04 Qwen 3.8 Max (xhigh): Pass^3 78.1%, cost per trial $0.25 Qwen 3.8 Max (low): Pass^3 73.4%, cost per trial $0.14 Qwen 3.8 Max (medium): Pass^3 73.4%, cost per trial $0.14 Qwen 3.8 Max (off): Pass^3 65.6%, cost per trial $0.1 GLM-5.3 (max): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.03 GLM-5.3 (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.02 GLM-5.3 (low): Pass^3 64.1%, cost per trial $0.01 Qwen 3.8 27B (low): Pass^3 64.1%, cost per trial $0.06 Qwen 3.8 27B (high): Pass^3 60.9%, cost per trial $0.07 GPT-6 Astra (low): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.2 GPT-6 Astra (medium): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.24 GPT-6 Astra (xhigh): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.36 GPT-6 Astra (high): Pass^3 82.8%, cost per trial $0.31 Grok 4.7 (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.17 Grok 4.7 (xhigh): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.19 Grok 4.7 (medium): Pass^3 70.3%, cost per trial $0.14 Grok 4.7 (low): Pass^3 68.8%, cost per trial $0.09 Grok 4.7 (max): Pass^3 26.6%, cost per trial $0.14 Claude Opus 5.5 (max): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $1.69 Claude Opus 5.5 (low): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.13 Claude Opus 5.5 (high): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.34 Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.66 GPT-6 Luna (off): Pass^3 48.4%, cost per trial $0.005 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh): Pass^3 90.6%, cost per trial $0.29 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $1.34 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.06 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low): Pass^3 71.9%, cost per trial $0.06 GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.06 GPT-6.1 Sol (high): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.05 GPT-6.1 Sol (low): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.03 Gemini 4 Argon (low): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.27 Gemini 4 Argon (medium): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.22 Gemini 4 Argon (high): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.37 Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.06 Claude Haiku 5.5 (max): Pass^3 82.8%, cost per trial $0.22 Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium): Pass^3 78.1%, cost per trial $0.01 Claude Haiku 5.5 (low): Pass^3 68.8%, cost per trial $0.007 Claude Haiku 5.5 (off): Pass^3 62.5%, cost per trial $0.008 Muse Spark Open (high): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.12 Muse Spark Open (xhigh): Pass^3 79.7%, cost per trial $0.12 Muse Spark Open (medium): Pass^3 70.3%, cost per trial $0.09 Muse Spark Open (low): Pass^3 65.6%, cost per trial $0.06 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.03 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (low): Pass^3 79.7%, cost per trial $0.01 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (high): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.01 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (off): Pass^3 54.7%, cost per trial $0.009 MiniMax-M3.1-Flash (high): Pass^3 64.1%, cost per trial $0.03 MiniMax-M3.1-Flash (low): Pass^3 51.6%, cost per trial $0.01 mistral-large-4-0 (high): Pass^3 81.3%, cost per trial $0.05. Not in our model list mistral-large-4-0 (low): Pass^3 78.1%, cost per trial $0.05. Not in our model list Claude Opus 5.5 (medium): Pass^3 93.8%, cost per trial $0.26 GPT-6 Luna (xhigh): Pass^3 84.4%, cost per trial $0.007 GPT-6 Luna (high): Pass^3 76.6%, cost per trial $0.005 GPT-6 Luna (medium): Pass^3 75%, cost per trial $0.004 GPT-6 Luna (low): Pass^3 56.3%, cost per trial $0.002 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high): Pass^3 89.1%, cost per trial $0.11 GPT-6.1 Sol (medium): Pass^3 87.5%, cost per trial $0.04 Claude Haiku 5.5 (high): Pass^3 85.9%, cost per trial $0.02 Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (high)GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)GPT-6 Luna (xhigh)GPT-6 Luna (high)GPT-6 Luna (medium)GPT-6 Luna (low)
ModelSettingPass^3Cost per trial
Claude Opus 5.5 medium 93.8% $0.26
Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh 90.6% $0.29
Claude Sonnet 5.5 high 89.1% $0.11
GPT-6.1 Sol medium 87.5% $0.04
Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh 87.5% $0.06
GPT-6 Astra low 87.5% $0.2
Gemini 4 Argon low 87.5% $0.27
Claude Opus 5.5 max 87.5% $1.69
Claude Haiku 5.5 high 85.9% $0.02
GPT-6.1 Sol high 85.9% $0.05
GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh 85.9% $0.06
Muse Spark Open high 85.9% $0.12
Claude Opus 5.5 low 85.9% $0.13
GPT-6 Astra medium 85.9% $0.24
GPT-6 Luna xhigh 84.4% $0.01
GPT-6.1 Sol low 84.4% $0.03
Gemini 4 Argon medium 84.4% $0.22
Claude Opus 5.5 high 84.4% $0.34
GPT-6 Astra xhigh 84.4% $0.36
Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh 84.4% $0.66
Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 84.4% $1.34
Claude Haiku 5.5 max 82.8% $0.22
GPT-6 Astra high 82.8% $0.31
GLM-5.3 max 81.3% $0.03
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max 81.3% $0.03
mistral-large-4-0 high 81.3% $0.05
Kimi K3 max 81.3% $0.09
Gemini 4 Argon high 81.3% $0.37
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 low 79.7% $0.01
Muse Spark Open xhigh 79.7% $0.12
Claude Haiku 5.5 medium 78.1% $0.01
mistral-large-4-0 low 78.1% $0.05
Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 78.1% $0.25
GPT-6 Luna high 76.6% $0.01
GLM-5.3 high 76.6% $0.02
Kimi K3 high 76.6% $0.07
Grok 4.7 high 76.6% $0.17
GPT-6 Luna medium 75% $0
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 high 75% $0.02
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium 75% $0.06
Grok 4.7 xhigh 75% $0.19
Qwen 3.8 Max low 73.4% $0.14
Qwen 3.8 Max medium 73.4% $0.14
Claude Sonnet 5.5 low 71.9% $0.06
Muse Spark Open medium 70.3% $0.09
Grok 4.7 medium 70.3% $0.14
Claude Haiku 5.5 low 68.8% $0.01
Kimi K3 low 68.8% $0.04
Grok 4.7 low 68.8% $0.09
GPT-5.6 Luna low 65.6% $0.01
Muse Spark Open low 65.6% $0.06
Qwen 3.8 Max off 65.6% $0.1
GLM-5.3 low 64.1% $0.01
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash high 64.1% $0.03
Qwen 3.8 27B low 64.1% $0.06
Claude Haiku 5.5 off 62.5% $0.01
Qwen 3.8 27B high 60.9% $0.07
GPT-6 Luna low 56.3% $0
Gemma 4 31B IT low 56.3% $0.02
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 off 54.7% $0.01
GPT-5.4 Mini low 54.7% $0.02
Gemma 4 31B IT high 53.1% $0.01
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash low 51.6% $0.02
Qwen3.6 27B high 51.6% $0.05
GPT-6 Luna off 48.4% $0.01
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B high 43.8% $0.02
Qwen3.6 27B low 40.6% $0.04
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B low 29.7% $0.03
Claude Haiku 4.5 off 26.6% $0.08
Grok 4.7 max 26.6% $0.14
GPT-5.4 Nano off 10.9% $0.01

The best score, 93.8%, costs $0.26 a task

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. Claude Sonnet 5.5 at high comes within 4.7 points of the best for $0.11 a task, about half the cost. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Anthropic OpenAI Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0.001 $0.01 $0.10 $1.00 $10 Cost per task, log scale Claude Opus 5.5, medium Claude Sonnet 5.5, high Claude Haiku 5.5, high GPT-6 Luna, high GPT-6 Luna, low 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0.001 $0.01 $0.10 $1.00 $10 Cost per task, log scale Claude Opus 5.5, medium GPT-6.1 Sol, medium

Source: Official o11y-bench leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Claude Opus 5.5 medium 93.8% $0.26
Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh 90.6% $0.29
Claude Sonnet 5.5 high 89.1% $0.11
GPT-6 Astra low 87.5% $0.20
Claude Opus 5.5 max 87.5% $1.69
GPT-6.1 Sol medium 87.5% $0.04
Gemini 4 Argon low 87.5% $0.27
Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh 87.5% $0.06
GPT-6 Astra medium 85.9% $0.24
Claude Opus 5.5 low 85.9% $0.13
GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh 85.9% $0.06
GPT-6.1 Sol high 85.9% $0.05
Claude Haiku 5.5 high 85.9% $0.02
Muse Spark Open high 85.9% $0.12
GPT-6 Astra xhigh 84.4% $0.36
Claude Opus 5.5 high 84.4% $0.34
Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh 84.4% $0.66
GPT-6 Luna xhigh 84.4% $0.007
Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 84.4% $1.34
GPT-6.1 Sol low 84.4% $0.03
Gemini 4 Argon medium 84.4% $0.22
GPT-6 Astra high 82.8% $0.31
Claude Haiku 5.5 max 82.8% $0.22
Kimi K3 max 81.3% $0.09
GLM-5.3 max 81.3% $0.03
Gemini 4 Argon high 81.3% $0.37
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max 81.3% $0.03
Muse Spark Open xhigh 79.7% $0.12
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 low 79.7% $0.01
Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 78.1% $0.25
Claude Haiku 5.5 medium 78.1% $0.01
Kimi K3 high 76.6% $0.07
GLM-5.3 high 76.6% $0.02
Grok 4.7 high 76.6% $0.17
GPT-6 Luna high 76.6% $0.005
Grok 4.7 xhigh 75% $0.19
GPT-6 Luna medium 75% $0.004
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium 75% $0.06
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 high 75% $0.01
Qwen 3.8 Max low 73.4% $0.14
Qwen 3.8 Max medium 73.4% $0.14
Claude Sonnet 5.5 low 71.9% $0.06
Grok 4.7 medium 70.3% $0.14
Muse Spark Open medium 70.3% $0.09
Kimi K3 low 68.8% $0.04
Grok 4.7 low 68.8% $0.09
Claude Haiku 5.5 low 68.8% $0.007
GPT-5.6 Luna low 65.6% $0.005
Qwen 3.8 Max off 65.6% $0.10
Muse Spark Open low 65.6% $0.06
GLM-5.3 low 64.1% $0.01
Qwen 3.8 27B low 64.1% $0.06
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash high 64.1% $0.03
Claude Haiku 5.5 off 62.5% $0.008
Qwen 3.8 27B high 60.9% $0.07
Gemma 4 31B IT low 56.3% $0.01
GPT-6 Luna low 56.3% $0.002
GPT-5.4 Mini low 54.7% $0.02
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 off 54.7% $0.009
Gemma 4 31B IT high 53.1% $0.01
Qwen3.6 27B high 51.6% $0.05
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash low 51.6% $0.01
GPT-6 Luna off 48.4% $0.005
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B high 43.8% $0.02
Qwen3.6 27B low 40.6% $0.04
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B low 29.7% $0.03
Claude Haiku 4.5 off 26.6% $0.08
Grok 4.7 max 26.6% $0.14
GPT-5.4 Nano off 10.9% $0.005

6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in April 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind Moonshot AI Anthropic
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra

Source: Official o11y-bench leaderboard

GPT-6 Astra on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 GPT-6 Astra Kimi K3 GPT-5.6 Luna Gemma 4 31B IT Claude Haiku 4.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 GPT-6 Astra

Source: Official o11y-bench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Terminal agents

All 19 in Terminal agents
  • SkillsBench In use 86-87 containerized expert tasks in 11 domains, run with and without Agent Skills. Verifier tests give pass rate and skill lift. GPT-5.5 67.3%
  • Terminal-Bench Hard In use Agents complete 44 hard tasks from Terminal-Bench Core in the Terminus 2 harness. Artificial Analysis scores pass@1 averaged over 3 repeats. Gemma 4 31B IT 36%
  • Harbor-Index In use Agents solve about 80 hard tasks drawn from 29 benchmarks run through Harbor adapters, such as HLE, GSO and SWE-bench Pro. Each task keeps its source verifier. GPT-5.5 28.1%
  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 Extended Not in model cards Agents complete long command-line tasks in containers, scored by verification tests. Mercor adds 99 new expert-written tasks to the 89 public ones and reports both scores. Muse Wonder 54%
  • Terminal-Bench 4.1 Not in model cards The Terminal-Bench 4.0 tasks with hardened verifiers: agents complete 66 hard tasks in containerized terminals across software, ML, science, security, and operations. Test scripts verify each result, scored as resolution rate. Claude Opus 5.5 65.8%
  • CompileBench Not in model cards Agents build real open-source projects through dependency problems, legacy toolchains and complex build systems, for example compiling 22-year-old code. Claude Opus 4.1 100%