Benchmark Almanac

OMEGA

Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4% leads since December 2025
Fading

Models solve generated competition-style math problems that test exploratory, compositional and transformative generalization beyond training patterns. Answers are checked automatically.

Ai2 hosts the explorative, compositional and transformative splits and a 500-problem set on Hugging Face. Olmo 3 cards report it.

Released
June 2025
Kind
Competition problems with answers
Level
Competition
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
December 2025

In the authors’ words

Recent large-scale language models (LLMs) with long Chain-of-Thought reasoning-such as DeepSeek-R1-have achieved impressive results on Olympiad-level mathematics benchmarks. However, they often rely on a narrow set of strategies and struggle with problems that require a novel way of thinking. To systematically investigate these limitations, we introduce OMEGA-Out-of-distribution Math Problems Evaluation with 3 Generalization Axes-a controlled yet diverse benchmark designed to evaluate three axes of out-of-distribution generalization, inspired by Boden's typology of creativity: (1) Exploratory-applying known problem solving skills to more complex instances within the same problem domain; (2) Compositional-combining distinct reasoning skills, previously learned in isolation, to solve novel problems that require integrating these skills in new and coherent ways; and (3) Transformative-adopting novel, often unconventional strategies by moving beyond familiar approaches to solve problems more effectively. OMEGA consists of programmatically generated training-test pairs derived from templated problem generators across geometry, number theory, algebra, combinatorics, logic, and puzzles, with solutions verified using symbolic, numerical, or graphical methods. We evaluate frontier (or top-tier) LLMs and observe sharp performance degradation as problem complexity increases. Moreover, we fine-tune the Qwen-series models across all generalization settings and observe notable improvements in exploratory generalization, while compositional generalization remains limited and transformative reasoning shows little to no improvement. By isolating and quantifying these fine-grained failures, OMEGA lays the groundwork for advancing LLMs toward genuine mathematical creativity beyond mechanical proficiency.

Abstract of OMEGA: Can LLMs Reason Outside the Box in Math? Evaluating Exploratory, Compositional, and Transformative Generalization (arXiv:2506.18880, CC0)
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Olmo 3.1 32B Think leads with 53.4%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4%
  2. 2 Olmo 3 32B Think 50.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 Olmo 3 32B Think 50.8% Nov 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Ai2
Lab claims Not tested since Dec 2025

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Olmo 3.1 32B Think 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Ai2
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 12, 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4 OMEGA
Nov 20, 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think 50.8 OMEGA

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Dec 15, 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think technical report 50.6 OMEGA, Final Think 3.0 column (Table 14) Capabilities
Dec 15, 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think technical report 53.4 OMEGA (Tables 1 and 14) Capabilities

More in Math

All 113 in Math
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • MathArena Apex Shortlist In use Models solve 47 hard final-answer problems that MathArena selected from 2025 competitions, where the best models scored about 50% at selection. Scored by accuracy over repeated attempts. GPT-5.5 98.4%