Benchmark Almanac

Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Olmo 3.1 32B Think ranks first on 2 of the 33 benchmarks with five or more models scored.

Ai2 Released December 12th, 2025 Family Olmo 3 The lab's model card Compare with others
37
Benchmarks with a score
2
Ranked first, out of five or more models
4
In the top three
Ai2 Dec 2025

Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Open weights Flagship

135.5 #225 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • IFBench 68.1% #49 /80
  • PopQA 30.9% #4 /7
  • LEXam-hard 18.4% #14 /15

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AGIEval 89.2% #1 of 40 Lab model card
IFEval 93.8% #12 of 135 Lab model card
BIG-Bench Hard 88.6% #10 of 73 Lab model card
AlpacaEval 2.0 69.1% #4 of 16 Lab model card
MMLU 86.4% #47 of 131 Lab model card
PopQA 30.9% #4 of 7 Lab model card
HUMAINE 26 #30 of 50 Official leaderboard
IFBench 68.1% #49 of 80 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,286 #245 of 335 Official leaderboard
Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) 47.0 #89 of 119 Official leaderboard

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MATH 96.2% #2 of 99 Lab model card
AIME 2024 80.6% #40 of 88 Lab model card
OMEGA 53.4% #1 of 2 Lab model card
AIME 2025 78.1% #92 of 143 Lab model card
ZebraLogic 80.1% #17 of 23 Lab model card
GPQA Diamond 57.5% #227 of 302 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LiveCodeBench 83.3% #8 of 54 Lab model card
HumanEval+ 91.5% #7 of 27 Lab model card
MBPP+ 68.3% #12 of 15 Lab model card
DesignArena 3D Design 985 #121 of 136 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Website 971 #136 of 151 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Game Dev 957 #133 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Code 965 #134 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Data Visualization 901 #116 of 118 Official leaderboard
DesignArena UI Component 850 #137 of 139 Official leaderboard
DesignArena SVG 862 #103 of 103 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SnakeBench 22 #112 of 188 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LEXam-hard 18.4% #14 of 15 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
WildGuardTest 96.9% #1 of 5 Lab model card
HarmBench 89.7% #2 of 5 Lab model card
BBQ (Bias Benchmark for QA) 85.5% #12 of 25 Lab model card
DoAnythingNow (DAN) 54.7% #1 of 2 Lab model card
TrustLLM JailbreakTrigger 86.4% #1 of 2 Lab model card
XSTest 91.8% #10 of 16 Lab model card
StrongREJECT 90.5% #12 of 19 Lab model card
Tulu 3 Safety Eval 83.6% #4 of 6 Lab model card
WMDP 32.7% #3 of 3 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 135.5, number 225 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 14 capability results Ai2 reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 132.5 to 138.5. How we compute it.

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 10 of them aren't in the launch post.

Olmo 3 Dec 15, 2025

Capabilities

Bio and chem risk