Benchmark Almanac

PaintBench

Nano Banana 2 17.1% tops its leaderboard GPT-Image-2 16.3% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Image editing models do precise single-answer edits in 20 operations such as geometric transforms, color changes and symbolic edits. Procedural generation gives deterministic checks.

Best model reached 17.1% at launch, per AINews.

Released
May 2026
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
June 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

While current multimodal models are proficient at open-ended visual editing, executing precise single-answer edits remains an important obstacle. To probe this challenge, we introduce PaintBench, a dynamically scalable benchmark targeting 20 fundamental precise visual editing operations across four categories: geometric transformation, structural manipulation, color change, and symbolic reasoning. Procedural generation with configurable complexity enables an effectively infinite, contamination-resistant evaluation suite, and deterministic pixel-level evaluation eliminates reliance on bias-prone judge models. Across 11 image editing models, we find overall low performance, with the current highest-performing industry leader scoring only 17.1% (mIoU). Task decomposition reveals especially challenging operation types (geometric transformation, most structural manipulation, formula-based color change) and model-specific specializations. Fine-grained benchmark diagnostics further show performance degradations induced by scene variations in object count, background complexity, color scheme, and edit-region size. To test generalization of PaintBench scores to applied task performance, we create a procedural, deterministic evaluation for data visualization editing (TinyGrafixBench) and find strong linear correlation with PaintBench scores (R² = 0.91, p < 0.001). Altogether, PaintBench provides a rigorous foundation for measuring and driving progress in precise multimodal visual editing.

Abstract of PaintBench: Deterministic Evaluation of Precise Visual Editing (arXiv:2606.00188, CC0)
11
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track

Nano Banana 2 tops the leaderboard with 17.1%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-Image-2, at 16.3%.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Nano Banana 2 17.1%
  2. 2 GPT-Image-2 16.3%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (nano-banana) 11.1%
  4. 4 Qwen-Image-Edit 6.70%
  5. 5 BAGEL-7B-MoT 5.00%
  6. 6 FLUX.2 [dev] 4.60%
  7. 7 FLUX.1-Kontext 3.90%
  8. 8 LongCat-Edit 3.60%
  9. 9 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B 3.50%
  10. 10 HunyuanImage 3.0 0.40%
  11. 11 InstructPix2Pix 0.30%

Source: Official PaintBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Nano Banana 2 17.1% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-Image-2 16.3% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (nano-banana) 11.1% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen-Image-Edit 6.70% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
5 BAGEL-7B-MoT 5.00% May 2025 Official leaderboard
6 FLUX.2 [dev] 4.60% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
7 FLUX.1-Kontext 3.90% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
8 LongCat-Edit 3.60% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
9 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B 3.50% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
10 HunyuanImage 3.0 0.40% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
11 InstructPix2Pix 0.30% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026
GPT-Image-2 16.3%

Source: Official PaintBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-Image-2 BAGEL-7B-MoT 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-Image-2 BAGEL-7B-MoT

Source: Official PaintBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%