Benchmark Almanac

PatchEval

GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9% leads since July 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9% leads since July 2026
In use

Models write patches for 1,000 real CVE vulnerabilities from 2015 to 2025 in Go, JavaScript and Python. Containers run exploit and unit tests to validate each patch.

inspect_evals uses the verified dockerized subset.

Made by
ByteDance
Released
November 2025
Kind
Finding and exploiting real bugs
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.6 Sol #13 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
November 2026
Last model added
November 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Software vulnerabilities are increasing at an alarming rate. However, manual patching is both time-consuming and resource-intensive, while existing automated vulnerability repair (AVR) techniques remain limited in effectiveness. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened a new paradigm for AVR, demonstrating remarkable progress. To examine the capability of LLMs in AVR, several vulnerability benchmarks have been proposed recently. However, they still suffer from key limitations of outdated vulnerabilities, limited language coverage, unreliable patch validation, and insufficient reproducibility. To overcome these challenges, we introduce PATCHEVAL, a multilingual benchmark for Go, JavaScript, and Python, languages for which existing benchmarks remain unexplored. PATCHEVAL curates a dataset of 1,000 vulnerabilities drawn from CVEs reported between 2015 and 2025, covering 65 distinct CWEs. A subset of 230 CVEs is further equipped with runtime sandbox environments, enabling patch verification through both security tests and functionality tests. To provide a systematic comparison of LLM-based vulnerability repair, we evaluate a series of state-of-the-art LLMs and agents, presenting an in-depth analysis that empirically yields key insights to guide future research in AVR.

Abstract of PATCHEVAL: A New Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Patching Real-World Vulnerabilities (arXiv:2511.11019, CC0)
9
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 83.9% among models released by July 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 83.9%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.6 Sol PatchEval-Verified 83.9%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 PatchEval-Verified 81.3%
  3. 3 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 PatchEval-Verified 80.4%
  4. 4 GPT-5.4 PatchEval-Verified 78.7%
  5. 5 seed-2.1-turbo PatchEval-Verified 72.2%
  6. 6 kimi-2.7-code PatchEval-Verified 68.3%
  7. 7 GLM-5.2 PatchEval-Verified 67%
  8. 8 MiniMax-M3 PatchEval-Verified 66.1%
  9. 9 Qwen3.7-Plus PatchEval-Verified 62.6%

Source: Official PatchEval leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9% PatchEval-Verified, codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.5 81.3% PatchEval-Verified, codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 80.4% PatchEval-Verified, codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.4 78.7% PatchEval-Verified, codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
5 seed-2.1-turbo 72.2% PatchEval-Verified, trae Official leaderboard
6 kimi-2.7-code 68.3% PatchEval-Verified, Opencode Official leaderboard
7 GLM-5.2 67% PatchEval-Verified, Opencode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
8 MiniMax-M3 66.1% PatchEval-Verified, codex Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3.7-Plus 62.6% PatchEval-Verified, Opencode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9% PatchEval-Verified, codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.5 81.3% PatchEval-Verified, codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 80.4% PatchEval-Verified, codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Inkling 2 Small 79.6% Nov 2026 Lab model card
5 GPT-5.4 78.7% PatchEval-Verified, codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GLM-5.2 67% PatchEval-Verified, Opencode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
7 MiniMax-M3 66.1% PatchEval-Verified, codex Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3.7-Plus 62.6% PatchEval-Verified, Opencode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in November 2025 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Replaced by PatchEval-Verified, Jul 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9%

Source: Official PatchEval leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol

Sources: Official PatchEval leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Thinking Machines
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Nov 5, 2026 Inkling 2 Small 79.6 PatchEval

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

OpenAI
PatchEval-Verified Not tested since Jul 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9%
PatchEval Replaced by PatchEval-Verified, Jul 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9%
PatchEval-Verified Not tested since Jul 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol 83.9%

Source: Official leaderboards

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%