PhyX
Models solve 3,000 image-based physics problems across six domains such as mechanics and optics. Versions include multiple choice and open-ended answers.
A 1,000 question testmini subset also exists, so check which split a model card reports.
- Made by
- Hui Shen et al.
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Science questions
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Existing benchmarks fail to capture a crucial aspect of intelligence: physical reasoning, the integrated ability to combine domain knowledge, symbolic reasoning, and understanding of real-world constraints. To address this gap, we introduce PhyX: the first large-scale benchmark designed to assess models capacity for physics-grounded reasoning in visual scenarios. PhyX includes 3K meticulously curated multimodal questions spanning 6 reasoning types across 25 sub-domains and 6 core physics domains: thermodynamics, electromagnetism, mechanics, modern physics, optics, and wave&acoustics. In our comprehensive evaluation, even state-of-the-art models struggle significantly with physical reasoning. GPT-4o, Claude3.7-Sonnet, and GPT-o4-mini achieve only 32.5%, 42.2%, and 45.8% accuracy respectively-performance gaps exceeding 29% compared to human experts. Our analysis exposes critical limitations in current models: over-reliance on memorized disciplinary knowledge, excessive dependence on mathematical formulations, and surface-level visual pattern matching rather than genuine physical understanding. We provide in-depth analysis through fine-grained statistics, detailed case studies, and multiple evaluation paradigms to thoroughly examine physical reasoning capabilities. To ensure reproducibility, we implement a compatible evaluation protocol based on widely-used toolkits such as VLMEvalKit, enabling one-click evaluation. More details are available on our project page: https://phyx-bench.github.io/.
DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 51.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is o4-mini, at 45.8%.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 83.5%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 51.2 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 45.8 o4-mini
- 42.2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 39.0 Claude3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 36.3 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified)
- 33.1
InternVL3-78B
- 32.5 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 31.5 o3-mini
- 15.4 Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct
- 13.6 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 10.2 DeepSeek-VL2-4.5B
- 7.90
InternVL3-14B
- 7.20 MiniCPM-o-8B
- 6.50
InternVL3-8B
- 5.70
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 3.40
Yi-VL-34B
- 1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 51.2%
- 2 o4-mini testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 45.8%
- 3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 42.2%
- 4 Claude3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 39%
- 5 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 36.3%
- 6
InternVL3-78B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 33.1%
- 7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 32.5%
- 8 o3-mini testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 31.5%
- 9 Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 15.4%
- 10 Claude 3.5 Haiku testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 13.6%
- 11 DeepSeek-VL2-4.5B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 10.2%
- 12
InternVL3-14B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 7.90%
- 13 MiniCPM-o-8B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 7.20%
- 14
InternVL3-8B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 6.50%
- 15
LLaVA-OneVision 7B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 5.70%
- 16
Yi-VL-34B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 3.40%
Source: Official PhyX leaderboard
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 72.1%
- 3
STEP3-VL-10B 59.5%
- 4 o4-mini testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 45.8%
- 5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 42.2%
- 6
InternVL3-78B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 33.1%
- 7 o3-mini testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 31.5%
- 8 Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 15.4%
- 9 Claude 3.5 Haiku testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 13.6%
- 10
InternVL3-14B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 7.90%
- 11
InternVL3-8B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 6.50%
- 12
LLaVA-OneVision 7B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 5.70%
- 13
Yi-VL-34B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 3.40%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official PhyX leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 51.2% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | o4-mini | 45.8% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 42.2% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 39% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) | 36.3% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 33.1% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 32.5% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | o3-mini | 31.5% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct | 15.4% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 13.6% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | DeepSeek-VL2-4.5B | 10.2% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 7.90% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | MiniCPM-o-8B | 7.20% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 6.50% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 5.70% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 3.40% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 83.5% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 72.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 59.5% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | o4-mini | 45.8% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 42.2% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 33.1% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | o3-mini | 31.5% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct | 15.4% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 13.6% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 7.90% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 6.50% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 5.70% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 3.40% | testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official PhyX leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official PhyX leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | 83.5 | PhyX | |
| Jan 13, 2026 | 59.5 | PhyX |
2 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 72.1 | PhyX (openended), testmini (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 59.5 | PhyX, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 66.01 | Capabilities |
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
- HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%