Benchmark Almanac

PhyX

DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 51.2% tops its leaderboard o4-mini 45.8% leads the models we track
Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5% leads since August 2026
Fading

Models solve 3,000 image-based physics problems across six domains such as mechanics and optics. Versions include multiple choice and open-ended answers.

A 1,000 question testmini subset also exists, so check which split a model card reports.

Made by
Hui Shen et al.
Released
May 2025
Kind
Science questions
Level
University
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Existing benchmarks fail to capture a crucial aspect of intelligence: physical reasoning, the integrated ability to combine domain knowledge, symbolic reasoning, and understanding of real-world constraints. To address this gap, we introduce PhyX: the first large-scale benchmark designed to assess models capacity for physics-grounded reasoning in visual scenarios. PhyX includes 3K meticulously curated multimodal questions spanning 6 reasoning types across 25 sub-domains and 6 core physics domains: thermodynamics, electromagnetism, mechanics, modern physics, optics, and wave&acoustics. In our comprehensive evaluation, even state-of-the-art models struggle significantly with physical reasoning. GPT-4o, Claude3.7-Sonnet, and GPT-o4-mini achieve only 32.5%, 42.2%, and 45.8% accuracy respectively-performance gaps exceeding 29% compared to human experts. Our analysis exposes critical limitations in current models: over-reliance on memorized disciplinary knowledge, excessive dependence on mathematical formulations, and surface-level visual pattern matching rather than genuine physical understanding. We provide in-depth analysis through fine-grained statistics, detailed case studies, and multiple evaluation paradigms to thoroughly examine physical reasoning capabilities. To ensure reproducibility, we implement a compatible evaluation protocol based on widely-used toolkits such as VLMEvalKit, enabling one-click evaluation. More details are available on our project page: https://phyx-bench.github.io/.

Abstract of PhyX: Does Your Model Have the "Wits" for Physical Reasoning? (arXiv:2505.15929, CC0)
16
Entries on its own leaderboard, 10 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 51.2%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is o4-mini, at 45.8%.

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 83.5%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 51.2%
  2. 2 o4-mini testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 45.8%
  3. 3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 42.2%
  4. 4 Claude3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 39%
  5. 5 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 36.3%
  6. 6 InternVL3-78B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 33.1%
  7. 7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 32.5%
  8. 8 o3-mini testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 31.5%
  9. 9 Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 15.4%
  10. 10 Claude 3.5 Haiku testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 13.6%
  11. 11 DeepSeek-VL2-4.5B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 10.2%
  12. 12 InternVL3-14B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 7.90%
  13. 13 MiniCPM-o-8B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 7.20%
  14. 14 InternVL3-8B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 6.50%
  15. 15 LLaVA-OneVision 7B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 5.70%
  16. 16 Yi-VL-34B testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy 3.40%

Source: Official PhyX leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 51.2% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Official leaderboard
2 o4-mini 45.8% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 42.2% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 39% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 36.3% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Official leaderboard
6 InternVL3-78B 33.1% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 32.5% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Official leaderboard
8 o3-mini 31.5% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct 15.4% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Claude 3.5 Haiku 13.6% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
11 DeepSeek-VL2-4.5B 10.2% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Official leaderboard
12 InternVL3-14B 7.90% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
13 MiniCPM-o-8B 7.20% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Official leaderboard
14 InternVL3-8B 6.50% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 5.70% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Yi-VL-34B 3.40% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 72.1% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 STEP3-VL-10B 59.5% Jan 2026 Lab model card
4 o4-mini 45.8% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 42.2% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL3-78B 33.1% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 o3-mini 31.5% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Kimi-VL-A3B-Instruct 15.4% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude 3.5 Haiku 13.6% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
10 InternVL3-14B 7.90% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL3-8B 6.50% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 5.70% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Yi-VL-34B 3.40% testmini; OE; Text-DeRedundancy Dec 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI StepFun ByteDance Seed Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2025
o4-mini 45.8%
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5%

Sources: Official PhyX leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro STEP3-VL-10B o4-mini o3-mini Claude 3.5 Haiku LLaVA-OneVision 7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro

Sources: Official PhyX leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

StepFun
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5 PhyX
Jan 13, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B 59.5 PhyX

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 72.1 PhyX (openended), testmini (Table 8) Capabilities
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 59.5 PhyX, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 66.01 Capabilities

More in Science and reasoning

All 92 in Science and reasoning
  • GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics. Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
  • Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
  • FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics. Intern-S2-397B 87%
  • BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
  • HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels. Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
  • LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%