Benchmark Almanac

QwenVisualOffice

Qwen 3.8 Max 44.6% leads since August 2026
In use

Models handle visual office tasks in an internal Qwen test set. Qwen has not published the tasks or how they are scored.

In-house Qwen benchmark, so scores cannot be checked independently.

Made by
Qwen (Alibaba)
Released
August 2026
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
6
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 44.6% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 44.6%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.1 Pro 39.6%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.8 34.5%
  4. 4 Qwen3.7-Plus 32.4%
  5. 5 Claude Fable 5 32.4%
  6. 6 GPT-5.6 Sol 29.5%

Source: Official QwenVisualOffice leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 44.6% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.1 Pro 39.6% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.8 34.5% May 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3.7-Plus 32.4% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Fable 5 32.4% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5.6 Sol 29.5% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 44.6%

Source: Official QwenVisualOffice leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Gemini 3.1 Pro

Sources: Official QwenVisualOffice leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 44.6 QwenVisualOffice

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen 3.8 Max 44.6% QwenVisualOffice 44.6% Leaderboard Same

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%