Benchmark Almanac

RealKIE-FCC Verified

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 67% leads since December 2025
Fading

Model extracts structured fields from scanned FCC invoices into a JSON schema. Amazon human-verified labels. Field-level similarity (ALNS).

Lab-created verified variant (Amazon AGI) of Indico's RealKIE FCC Invoices set (RealKIE released 2024-03).

Released
December 2025
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
December 2025

In the authors’ words

We introduce RealKIE, a benchmark of five challenging datasets aimed at advancing key information extraction methods, with an emphasis on enterprise applications. The datasets include a diverse range of documents including SEC S1 Filings, US Non-disclosure Agreements, UK Charity Reports, FCC Invoices, and Resource Contracts. Each presents unique challenges: poor text serialization, sparse annotations in long documents, and complex tabular layouts. These datasets provide a realistic testing ground for key information extraction tasks like investment analysis and contract analysis. In addition to presenting these datasets, we offer an in-depth description of the annotation process, document processing techniques, and baseline modeling approaches. This contribution facilitates the development of NLP models capable of handling practical challenges and supports further research into information extraction technologies applicable to industry-specific problems. The annotated data, OCR outputs, and code to reproduce baselines are available to download at https://indicodatasolutions.github.io/RealKIE/.

Abstract of RealKIE: Five Novel Datasets for Enterprise Key Information Extraction (arXiv:2403.20101, CC0)
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads with 67% among models released by December 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 67%
  2. 2 Nova 2 Lite 62.1%
  3. 3 Nova 2 Omni Preview 59.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 67% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 Nova 2 Lite 62.1% Dec 2025 Lab model card
3 Nova 2 Omni Preview 59.8% Dec 2025 Lab model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Amazon
Lab claims Not tested since Dec 2025

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Amazon
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Omni Preview 59.8 RealKIE-FCC Verified ALNS
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Lite 62.1 RealKIE-FCC Verified ALNS
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 67 RealKIE-FCC Verified ALNS

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Omni Preview technical report 59.8 RealKIE-FCC Verified ALNS (Table 6) Capabilities
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Lite technical report 62.1 RealKIE-FCC Verified ALNS (Table 3) Capabilities
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview technical report 67 RealKIE-FCC Verified ALNS (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%