Benchmark Almanac

RoboSpatial-Home

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% leads since September 2025
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% leads since September 2025
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% leads since September 2025
Dropped

Models answer 350 spatial questions on home scenes for robots, in three types: object context, compatibility of placements and spatial configuration.

The test set of the RoboSpatial paper (CVPR 2025). Some answers are 2D points, others yes or no.

Released
November 2024
Kind
Spatial reasoning and counting
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
May 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Spatial understanding is a crucial capability that enables robots to perceive their surroundings, reason about their environment, and interact with it meaningfully. In modern robotics, these capabilities are increasingly provided by vision-language models. However, these models face significant challenges in spatial reasoning tasks, as their training data are based on general-purpose image datasets that often lack sophisticated spatial understanding. For example, datasets frequently do not capture reference frame comprehension, yet effective spatial reasoning requires understanding whether to reason from ego-, world-, or object-centric perspectives. To address this issue, we introduce RoboSpatial, a large-scale dataset for spatial understanding in robotics. It consists of real indoor and tabletop scenes, captured as 3D scans and egocentric images, and annotated with rich spatial information relevant to robotics. The dataset includes 1M images, 5k 3D scans, and 3M annotated spatial relationships, and the pairing of 2D egocentric images with 3D scans makes it both 2D- and 3D- ready. Our experiments show that models trained with RoboSpatial outperform baselines on downstream tasks such as spatial affordance prediction, spatial relationship prediction, and robot manipulation.

Abstract of RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Robotics (arXiv:2411.16537, CC0)
3
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
4
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B leads with 73.9% among models released by July 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B leads with 73.9% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B leads with 73.9%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9%
  2. 2 Cosmos3-Nano 66.3%
  3. 3 Cosmos3-Edge 63.4%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% Sep 2025 Lab model card
2 Cosmos3-Nano 66.3% May 2026 Lab model card
3 Cosmos3-Edge 63.4% May 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 52.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5 mini 51.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct 49.1% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Cosmos3-Nano 66.3% May 2026 Lab model card
3 Cosmos3-Edge 63.4% May 2026 Lab model card
4 GPT-5 52.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5 mini 51.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct 49.1% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 13 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in November 2024 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2025
Lab claims Not tested since May 2026

Sources: Official RoboSpatial-Home leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B GPT-5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B GPT-5

Sources: Official RoboSpatial-Home leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since September 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 23, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9 RoboSpatialHome

4 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 66.3 RoboSpatialHome, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Edge technical report 63.4 RoboSpatialHome, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 73.9 RoboSpatialHome (Table 2) Capabilities
Sep 25, 2025 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview technical report RoboSpatial-Pointing 31.1 and RoboSpatial-VQA 79.3 reported separately, no combined score (Table 19, thinking on) Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% RoboSpatialHome 73.9% Leaderboard, thinking Same

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%